• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)与逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗马蹄肾结石的安全性和有效性:一项关键的对比评估

Safety and efficacy of PNL vs RIRS in the management of stones located in horseshoe kidneys: A critical comparative evaluation.

作者信息

Eryildirim Bilal, Kucuk Eyup Veli, Atis Gokhan, Ozturk Metin, Senkul Temucin, Tuncer Murat, Tahra Ahmet, Turan Turgay, Koca Orhan, Ates Ferhat, Yilmaz Omer, Gurbuz Cenk, Sarica Kemal

机构信息

Health Sciences University, Dr. Lütfi Kirdar Training and Research Hospital, Urology Clinic, Istanbul.

出版信息

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2018 Sep 30;90(3):149-154. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2018.3.149.

DOI:10.4081/aiua.2018.3.149
PMID:30362675
Abstract

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of two different techniques (Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) vs Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)) in the management of stones in patients with horseshoe kidneys (HSK).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Departmental files of 88 cases with radiopaque kidney stones in horseshoe kidneys undergoing two different approaches (PNL vs RIRS) were evaluated with respect to the success and complication rates of in a retrospective manner. In addition to the factors related with the procedures (success and complication rates, additional procedures), patient and stone characteristics were all well evaluated. Findings obtained in both groups were evaluated in a comparative manner with respect to the statistical significance.

RESULTS

Stone free rates were comparable in both groups after 1-week period (81.6% PNL vs 80% RIRS). As well as 3 months evaluation (84.2% PNL and 82.0% RIRS). The percentage of the cases with residual fragments (> 4 mm) were similar in both groups and while all PNL procedures were completed in one session, mean number of RIRS sessions was higher (1.22 ± 0.05). Mean duration of the procedure was slightly higher in RIRS group and based on Clavien scoring system, despite a higher risk of Hb drop noted in patients treated with PNL, all complication rates were found to be similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that of the available minimally invasive treatment alternatives, both PNL and RIRS could be safe and effective alternatives for renal stone removal in patients with HSK.

摘要

目的

评估两种不同技术(经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)与逆行肾内手术(RIRS))治疗马蹄肾(HSK)患者结石的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

回顾性评估88例接受两种不同方法(PNL与RIRS)治疗的马蹄肾不透X线肾结石患者的科室档案,评估成功率和并发症发生率。除了与手术相关的因素(成功率和并发症发生率、额外手术)外,还对患者和结石特征进行了全面评估。对两组获得的结果进行比较,评估其统计学意义。

结果

1周后两组结石清除率相当(PNL为81.6%,RIRS为80%)。3个月评估时也是如此(PNL为84.2%,RIRS为82.0%)。两组残留碎片(>4mm)病例的百分比相似,虽然所有PNL手术均在一次手术中完成,但RIRS手术的平均次数更高(1.22±0.05)。RIRS组手术平均持续时间略长,根据Clavien评分系统,尽管PNL治疗患者血红蛋白下降风险较高,但两组所有并发症发生率相似。

结论

我们的结果表明,在现有的微创治疗选择中,PNL和RIRS都是HSK患者肾结石清除的安全有效选择。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of PNL vs RIRS in the management of stones located in horseshoe kidneys: A critical comparative evaluation.经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)与逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗马蹄肾结石的安全性和有效性:一项关键的对比评估
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2018 Sep 30;90(3):149-154. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2018.3.149.
2
Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones.比较逆行性肾内手术、体外冲击波碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗中等大小透光性肾结石。
World J Urol. 2013 Dec;31(6):1581-6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0991-1. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
3
A Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Management of Renal Stones ?2 CM.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径≥2厘米肾结石的比较
Urol J. 2017 Jan 18;14(1):2949-2954.
4
A prospective randomized comparison of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (Microperc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower pole kidney stones.微创经皮肾镜取石术(Microperc)与逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)治疗下极肾结石的前瞻性随机对照比较。
World J Urol. 2017 Nov;35(11):1771-1776. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2058-9. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
5
Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Methods For Management of Big- Sized Kidney Stones(? 4 cm): Single Center Retrospective Study.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大尺寸肾结石(≥4 cm)的比较:单中心回顾性研究
Urol J. 2019 Jun 17;16(3):232-235. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4072.
6
Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus a single-session percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole stones with a diameter of 15 to 30 mm: A propensity score-matching study.逆行性肾内手术与一期经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径15至30毫米下极结石的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Korean J Urol. 2015 Jul;56(7):525-32. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.7.525. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for stones in anomalous-kidneys: a prospective study.经皮肾镜碎石术治疗异常肾肾结石: 一项前瞻性研究。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Aug;45(4):407-414. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0926-1. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
8
Comparative analysis of retrograde intrarenal surgery and modified ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower pole renal stones (1.5-3.5 cm).逆行性肾内手术与改良超微经皮肾镜取石术治疗下极肾结石(1.5-3.5cm)的对比分析。
BMC Urol. 2020 Mar 16;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00586-6.
9
Surgical management of urinary stones with abnormal kidney anatomy.肾脏解剖异常的尿路结石的外科治疗
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2017 Apr;33(4):207-211. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
10
Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in multiple calyceal stones: A match pair analysis of 190 cases.对比逆行性肾内手术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗多发肾盏结石:190 例配对分析。
Arch Esp Urol. 2021 Mar;74(2):247-253.

引用本文的文献

1
Reviewing the complexities of horseshoe kidney: insights into embryogenesis and surgical considerations.马蹄肾的复杂性综述:对胚胎发生及手术考量的见解
J Med Life. 2025 Jan;18(1):10-19. doi: 10.25122/jml-2024-0325.
2
"Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus other treatments for stone management in horseshoe kidneys: A systematic review".经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)与马蹄肾结石治疗的其他方法:一项系统评价
Arab J Urol. 2024 Feb 6;22(4):243-252. doi: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2312699. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparative evaluation of urolithiasis management options in patients with horseshoe kidney: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
马蹄肾患者尿路结石治疗方案的比较评估:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Curr Urol. 2023 Sep;17(3):193-205. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000199. Epub 2023 May 5.
4
Is supine position safe and effective for the percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Clinical experiences, tip and tricks in learning curve and PSAA technique.仰卧位对于经皮肾镜取石术是否安全有效?学习曲线中的临床经验、技巧及 PSAA 技术。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Mar 30;51(1):62. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01431-9.
5
Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?在当今时代,经皮肾镜取石术还有一席之地吗?
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 31;11(17):5157. doi: 10.3390/jcm11175157.
6
Alternating Biplanar Fluoroscopy in Percutaneous Nephrostomy to Approach Stones in Patients With Horseshoe Kidney: An Institutional Experience.经皮肾造瘘术中交替双平面荧光透视法处理马蹄肾患者结石:机构经验
Cureus. 2021 Jul 21;13(7):e16542. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16542. eCollection 2021 Jul.