University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada.
Rockwood Psychological Services, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Sex Abuse. 2020 Mar;32(2):127-153. doi: 10.1177/1079063218807486. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
This article describes an evaluation of the effects of an early version (1991-2001) of Rockwood's prison-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/Risk-Needs-Responsivity (CBT/RNR) sex offender program that had emerging elements of a strength-based approach. This program was implemented under contract to Correctional Service of Canada (CSC) and continued to evolve in response to emerging evidence until it closed in 2013. Thus, the program as evaluated here did not involve a fixed approach as did the comparison CSC program (hereafter referred to as SOTP). Long-term reoffense data, from Rockwood's program ( = 579), were compared with SOTP ( = 625) and with a group of untreated men ( = 107) sentenced for sex offenses. A modified brief actuarial risk scale (BARS-M) was used to control for baseline risk among the three groups, along with additional controls for age at release, victim type, and individual differences in the length of long-term follow-up period. Both treatment groups displayed lower rates of both sexual and violent reoffending when compared with the no-treatment offenders. Overall, the Rockwood program generated the lowest recidivism rates. The results demonstrate that prison-based sex offense-specific treatment can be effective. We discuss the strengths and limitations of the current design through the Collaborative Outcome Data Committee's guidelines.
本文描述了对罗克伍德(Rockwood)基于监狱的认知行为疗法/风险-需求-反应性(CBT/RNR)性犯罪者方案早期版本(1991-2001 年)的效果评估,该方案具有新兴的基于优势的方法要素。该方案是根据加拿大惩教署(CSC)的合同实施的,并根据新出现的证据不断发展,直到 2013 年关闭。因此,这里评估的方案并没有像比较的 CSC 方案(以下简称 SOTP)那样采用固定的方法。从罗克伍德的方案(=579)获得的长期再犯罪数据与 SOTP(=625)以及一组未经治疗的性犯罪者(=107)进行了比较。使用改良的简短评估风险量表(BARS-M)来控制三组的基线风险,同时还控制了释放时的年龄、受害者类型以及长期随访期个体差异的影响。与未接受治疗的罪犯相比,治疗组的性犯罪和暴力犯罪再犯率都较低。总体而言,罗克伍德方案的复发率最低。结果表明,针对特定性犯罪的监狱治疗可以有效。我们通过协作结果数据委员会的指导方针讨论了当前设计的优缺点。