Raja Nicholas, Russell Christopher M, George Arvin K
Department of Urology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Department of Urology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Sep;7(Suppl 4):S436-S442. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.07.01.
The purpose of this review is to highlight the role of existing and promising urinary biomarkers for the detection and prognostication of prostate cancer (PCa). A number of novel urinary biomarkers have been introduced into the clinical space, which in combination with clinical variables, have demonstrated an increased ability to select patients for biopsy and identify men at risk of harboring clinically significant PCa. Though a number of assays require further validation, initial data is promising and forthcoming results will ultimately determine their clinical utility and commercial availability. For the past 30 years, first-line screening for PCa has relied on measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and the results from a digital rectal exam (DRE). A large body of evidence from the last 3 decades indicates that these screening methods are problematic, and often inadequate for detecting clinically significant PCa. Extensive efforts have recently been made to identify and commercialize novel PCa biomarkers for more effective detection of PCa, either alone or in combination with current screening methods. This review article highlights problems with current screening standards, and discusses 6 urinary biomarker assays in terms of their ability to detect and risk-stratify PCa: prostate cancer antigen 3 (PCA3), TMPRSS2-ERG, second chromosome locus associated with prostate-1 (SChLAP1), ExoDx, SelectMDx, and Michigan Prostate Score (MiPS).
本综述的目的是强调现有及有潜力的尿液生物标志物在前列腺癌(PCa)检测和预后评估中的作用。一些新型尿液生物标志物已进入临床应用领域,它们与临床变量相结合,已显示出在选择活检患者以及识别有临床意义的PCa风险男性方面能力有所增强。尽管一些检测方法需要进一步验证,但初步数据很有前景,后续结果将最终决定它们的临床实用性和商业可用性。在过去30年里,PCa的一线筛查依赖于血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平测定和直肠指检(DRE)结果。过去30年的大量证据表明,这些筛查方法存在问题,往往不足以检测出有临床意义的PCa。最近人们进行了广泛努力,以识别新型PCa生物标志物并将其商业化,用于更有效地检测PCa,无论是单独使用还是与当前筛查方法联合使用。这篇综述文章强调了当前筛查标准存在的问题,并从检测和对PCa进行风险分层的能力方面讨论了6种尿液生物标志物检测方法:前列腺癌抗原3(PCA3)、跨膜丝氨酸蛋白酶2-ETS易位因子(TMPRSS2-ERG)、与前列腺相关的二号染色体位点(SChLAP1)、ExoDx、SelectMDx和密歇根前列腺评分(MiPS)。