• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The learning curve associated with intracranial angioplasty and stenting: analysis from a single center.颅内血管成形术和支架置入术的学习曲线:来自单一中心的分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Aug;6(16):319. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.08.08.
2
Learning curve for intracranial angioplasty and stenting in single center.单中心颅内血管成形术和支架置入术的学习曲线。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan 1;83(1):E94-100. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25038. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
3
Learning curve of Wingspan stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis: single-center experience of 95 consecutive patients.Wingspan 支架治疗颅内动脉粥样硬化的学习曲线:单中心 95 例连续患者的经验。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 Apr 1;6(3):212-8. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010593. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
4
Revisiting angioplasty without stenting for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis after the stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis (SAMMPRIS) study.SAMMPRIS 研究后,对于症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄患者,血管成形术不伴支架置入治疗能否替代支架置入和强化药物治疗预防颅内狭窄患者卒中复发。
Neurosurgery. 2012 Dec;71(6):1103-10. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318271bcb8.
5
China Angioplasty and Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Severe Stenosis (CASSISS): A new, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial in China.中国症状性颅内重度狭窄血管成形术和支架置入术(CASSISS):一项在中国开展的新的前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Apr;21(2):196-204. doi: 10.1177/1591019915581778. Epub 2015 May 1.
6
Primary balloon angioplasty for symptomatic, high-grade intracranial stenosis.症状性重度颅内狭窄的初次球囊血管成形术
Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:18. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.107542. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
7
Statins reduce peri-procedural complications in carotid stenting.他汀类药物可降低颈动脉支架置入术围手术期并发症。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;48(6):626-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.08.010. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
8
Undersized angioplasty and stenting of symptomatic intracranial tight stenosis with Enterprise: Evaluation of clinical and vascular outcome.使用Enterprise进行症状性颅内重度狭窄的小型血管成形术和支架置入术:临床和血管结局评估
Interv Neuroradiol. 2016 Apr;22(2):187-95. doi: 10.1177/1591019915609165. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
9
Factors associated with perforator stroke after selective basilar artery angioplasty or stenting.选择性基底动脉血管成形术或支架置入术后穿支血管卒中的相关因素。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Aug;9(8):738-742. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012329. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
10
Peri-procedural stroke or death in stenting of symptomatic severe intracranial stenosis.症状性严重颅内狭窄支架置入术的围手术期卒中或死亡。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):374-379. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015225. Epub 2019 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications and long-term in-stent restenosis of endovascular treatment of severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis and relevant risk factors.严重症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄血管内治疗的并发症和长期支架内再狭窄及相关危险因素。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 22;102(38):e34697. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034697.
2
A non-linear relationship between lesion length and risk of recurrent cerebral ischemia after stenting for symptomatic intracranial stenosis with hemodynamic impairment.对于有血流动力学损害的症状性颅内狭窄患者,支架置入术后病变长度与复发性脑缺血风险之间存在非线性关系。
Front Neurol. 2023 Apr 18;14:1122708. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1122708. eCollection 2023.
3
Endovascular Therapy for Intracranial Artery Stenosis: Results from the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET)3.颅内动脉狭窄血管内治疗:日本神经血管内治疗登记研究(JR-NET)3 期结果。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2020 May 15;60(5):256-263. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2019-0271. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Stroke Caused by Atherosclerosis of the Major Intracranial Arteries.主要颅内动脉粥样硬化所致的中风
Circ Res. 2017 Feb 3;120(3):502-513. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308441.
2
Wingspan stenting can effectively prevent long-term strokes for patients with severe symptomatic atherosclerotic basilar stenosis.对于有严重症状性动脉粥样硬化性基底动脉狭窄的患者,翼展式支架置入术可有效预防长期中风。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2016 Jun;22(3):318-24. doi: 10.1177/1591019915623797. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
3
China Angioplasty and Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Severe Stenosis (CASSISS): A new, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial in China.中国症状性颅内重度狭窄血管成形术和支架置入术(CASSISS):一项在中国开展的新的前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。
Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Apr;21(2):196-204. doi: 10.1177/1591019915581778. Epub 2015 May 1.
4
Hyperperfusion Syndrome After Stenting for Intracranial Artery Stenosis.颅内动脉狭窄支架置入术后的高灌注综合征
Cell Biochem Biophys. 2015 Apr;71(3):1537-42. doi: 10.1007/s12013-014-0377-7.
5
Prevalence and outcomes of symptomatic intracranial large artery stenoses and occlusions in China: the Chinese Intracranial Atherosclerosis (CICAS) Study.中国症状性颅内大动脉狭窄和闭塞的患病率和结局:中国颅内动脉硬化(CICAS)研究。
Stroke. 2014 Mar;45(3):663-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003508. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
6
Learning curve for intracranial angioplasty and stenting in single center.单中心颅内血管成形术和支架置入术的学习曲线。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Jan 1;83(1):E94-100. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25038. Epub 2013 Jul 1.
7
Learning curve of Wingspan stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis: single-center experience of 95 consecutive patients.Wingspan 支架治疗颅内动脉粥样硬化的学习曲线:单中心 95 例连续患者的经验。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2014 Apr 1;6(3):212-8. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010593. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
8
Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis.颅内动脉狭窄的血管内支架置入与积极药物治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):993-1003. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105335. Epub 2011 Sep 7.
9
Angioplasty and stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with nitinol stent: factors affecting technical success and patient safety.颅内动脉粥样硬化狭窄的血管成形术和支架置入术:影响技术成功和患者安全的因素。
Neurosurgery. 2012 Mar;70(1 Suppl Operative):104-13. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182320bb0.
10
Predictive factors for in-stent restenosis after balloon-mounted stent placement for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis.症状性颅内动脉粥样硬化行球囊扩张支架置入术后支架内再狭窄的预测因素。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Oct;40(4):499-506. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.05.007. Epub 2010 Jun 15.

颅内血管成形术和支架置入术的学习曲线:来自单一中心的分析。

The learning curve associated with intracranial angioplasty and stenting: analysis from a single center.

作者信息

Zhou Peiquan, Zhang Guang, Ji Zhiyong, Xu Shancai, Shi Huaizhang

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2018 Aug;6(16):319. doi: 10.21037/atm.2018.08.08.

DOI:10.21037/atm.2018.08.08
PMID:30364053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6186977/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intracranial angioplasty and stenting is an optional treatment for patients with symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis (IAS) who have failed to respond to standard medical therapy. We aimed to analyze the effect of the operator's learning curve in our center in terms of the safety of intracranial angioplasty and stenting.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we analyzed patients treated with intracranial angioplasty and stenting in our center between January 2007 and December 2015. The endpoint was peri-procedure complications within 30 days. A risk-adjusted cumulative sum chart was used for the learning curve analysis. Multivariable logistic analysis was also used to evaluate the effect of the learning curve on intracranial angioplasty and stenting.

RESULTS

A total of 329 patients were included. The overall peri-procedure complication rate was 8.21% (27/329). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that operators with experience of >20 cases [odds ratio (OR) =0.229; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.059-0.893] and >40 cases (OR =0.024; 95% CI: 0.006-0.093) were associated with a low risk of complications compared with operators with experience of ≤20 cases. Furthermore, patients with hypertension (OR =3.595; 95% CI: 1.104-11.702) and stenosis of Mori classification C (OR =28.562; 95% CI: 4.788-170.395) were associated with a high risk of complications. The observed outcome was better than expected (more negative deflections) after the 30 consecutive case.

CONCLUSIONS

The level of operator experience can influence the risk of peri-procedure complications associated with intracranial angioplasty and stenting. A total of 30 consecutive cases is required for an operator to overcome the learning curve.

摘要

背景

对于标准药物治疗无效的症状性颅内动脉狭窄(IAS)患者,颅内血管成形术和支架置入术是一种可选的治疗方法。我们旨在分析在我们中心,术者学习曲线对颅内血管成形术和支架置入术安全性的影响。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,我们分析了2007年1月至2015年12月期间在我们中心接受颅内血管成形术和支架置入术治疗的患者。终点为30天内的围手术期并发症。采用风险调整累积和图进行学习曲线分析。多变量逻辑分析也用于评估学习曲线对颅内血管成形术和支架置入术的影响。

结果

共纳入329例患者。总体围手术期并发症发生率为8.21%(27/329)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,与经验≤20例的术者相比,经验>20例(比值比[OR]=0.229;95%置信区间[CI]:0.059 - 0.893)和>40例(OR =0.024;95% CI:0.006 - 0.093)的术者并发症风险较低。此外,高血压患者(OR =3.595;95% CI:1.104 - 11.702)和森分类C级狭窄患者(OR =28.562;95% CI:4.788 - 170.395)并发症风险较高。连续30例病例后观察到的结果优于预期(更多负偏差)。

结论

术者经验水平可影响颅内血管成形术和支架置入术相关围手术期并发症的风险。术者需要连续完成30例病例才能克服学习曲线。