Suppr超能文献

经支气管针吸活检在支气管源性癌诊断中的应用

Transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of bronchogenic carcinoma.

作者信息

Schenk D A, Bryan C L, Bower J H, Myers D L

出版信息

Chest. 1987 Jul;92(1):83-5. doi: 10.1378/chest.92.1.83.

Abstract

Transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) was performed as a diagnostic procedure in 91 consecutive patients ultimately proven to have bronchogenic carcinoma. Results of TBNA were compared, in the same patients, to the diagnostic yield of cytologic examination of sputum, endobronchial brushings and washings, and endobronchial/transbronchial biopsy. The diagnostic yield for sputum was 13 percent (10 of 75); brushings, 40 percent (34 of 84); washings, 29 percent (26 of 89); biopsy, 56 percent (42 of 75); and TBNA, 45 percent (41 of 91). Aspirates were positive in 35 percent of patients with adenocarcinoma, 41 percent with squamous cell carcinoma, 52 percent with large cell undifferentiated carcinoma, and 55 percent of patients with small cell carcinoma. Carinal aspirates were positive in 54 percent (6 of 11); paratracheal aspirates, 57 percent (13 of 23); parabronchial aspirates, 39 percent (11 of 28); endobronchial, 78 percent (7 of 9), and peripheral mass or solitary pulmonary nodule, 40 percent (17 of 42). The overall diagnostic yield for brushings, washings, and biopsy was 64 percent. The addition of TBNA increased the yield to 71 percent. Bronchogenic carcinoma was diagnosed solely by TBNA in six patients, all with extrabronchial or extratracheal lesions. We conclude that TBNA increases the diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy, particularly in patients with extratracheal and extrabronchial lesions. An equally important observation is that TBNA fails to contribute significantly to the diagnosis of cancer in patients with lesions readily accessible by conventional bronchoscopic techniques. Exceptions to this observation include occasional patients with necrotic endobronchial tumors, submucosal lesions, and rarely patients with peripheral lung nodules or masses.

摘要

对91例最终确诊为支气管源性癌的连续患者进行了经支气管针吸活检(TBNA)作为诊断手段。在同一批患者中,将TBNA的结果与痰细胞学检查、支气管内刷检和灌洗以及支气管内/经支气管活检的诊断阳性率进行了比较。痰检的诊断阳性率为13%(75例中的10例);刷检为40%(84例中的34例);灌洗为29%(89例中的26例);活检为56%(75例中的42例);TBNA为45%(91例中的41例)。腺癌患者中吸出物阳性率为35%,鳞状细胞癌患者为41%,大细胞未分化癌患者为52%,小细胞癌患者为55%。隆突吸出物阳性率为54%(11例中的6例);气管旁吸出物为57%(23例中的13例);支气管旁吸出物为39%(28例中的11例);支气管内为78%(9例中的7例),外周肿块或孤立性肺结节为40%(42例中的17例)。刷检、灌洗和活检的总体诊断阳性率为64%。加上TBNA后,阳性率提高到71%。有6例患者仅通过TBNA确诊为支气管源性癌,均为支气管外或气管外病变。我们得出结论,TBNA提高了支气管镜检查的诊断阳性率,特别是对于有气管外和支气管外病变的患者。同样重要的一点是,对于通过传统支气管镜技术易于取材的病变患者,TBNA对癌症诊断的贡献不大。这一观察结果的例外情况包括偶尔出现的支气管内坏死肿瘤患者、黏膜下病变患者,以及极少的外周肺结节或肿块患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验