Adams Danielle R
Danielle R. Adams, AM, BA, is a PhD student, School of Social Service Administration, University of Chicago, 969 East 60th Street, Chicago, IL; e-mail:
Soc Work. 2019 Jan 1;64(1):19-28. doi: 10.1093/sw/swy046.
In recent years, community-academic partnerships (CAPs) have gained traction in academia as a method for bridging the research-to-practice gap and reducing health disparities for marginalized populations. The field of social work may be well poised to enhance its ability to engage in partnerships and research around partnerships given its emphasis on conducting practice research and its historical roots in boundary spanning. In this article, the author begins by defining collaborative partnerships between academics and community stakeholders and then states specific advantages and challenges to collaborative partnerships in the field of social work. Throughout, the author explains how the historical foundations of the field (for example, acting as boundary spanners, advocating for marginalized individuals) place social workers in an ideal position to become leaders in the development, sustainment, and strengthening of CAPs. The author details the ways in which social work researchers can use the field's unique history to enhance the development and sustainment of CAPs. The article concludes by encouraging the field to use standardized terminology, methodology, and evaluation procedures when conducting CAPs and providing strategies for social work researchers who wish to increase their ability to develop and sustain CAPs within their own institutions.
近年来,社区 - 学术伙伴关系(CAPs)作为一种弥合研究与实践差距、减少边缘化人群健康差距的方法,在学术界越来越受到关注。鉴于社会工作领域强调开展实践研究以及其在跨越边界方面的历史根源,它可能非常有条件提升其参与伙伴关系及围绕伙伴关系进行研究的能力。在本文中,作者首先定义了学者与社区利益相关者之间的合作伙伴关系,然后阐述了社会工作领域合作伙伴关系的具体优势和挑战。在整个论述过程中,作者解释了该领域的历史基础(例如,作为边界跨越者、为边缘化个体发声)如何使社会工作者处于理想位置,从而成为社区 - 学术伙伴关系发展、维持和强化的领导者。作者详细说明了社会工作研究者可以如何利用该领域独特的历史来促进社区 - 学术伙伴关系的发展和维持。文章最后鼓励该领域在开展社区 - 学术伙伴关系时使用标准化的术语、方法和评估程序,并为希望在自己所在机构提高发展和维持社区 - 学术伙伴关系能力的社会工作研究者提供策略。