• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区合作伙伴对底特律基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的益处、挑战、促进因素及经验教训的看法

Community Partner Perspectives on Benefits, Challenges, Facilitating Factors, and Lessons Learned from Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships in Detroit.

作者信息

Caldwell Wilma Brakefield, Reyes Angela G, Rowe Zachary, Weinert Julia, Israel Barbara A

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):299-311. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0031.

DOI:10.1353/cpr.2015.0031
PMID:26412771
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is an extensive body of literature on community-based participatory research (CBPR) and the role of community-academic partnerships, much of which has involved community partners in the conceptualization and preparation of publications. However, there has been a relative dearth of solely community voices addressing these topics, given the other roles and responsibilities which community members and leaders of community-based organizations (CBOs) have.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to share the perspectives of three long-time (>20 years) community partners involved in the Detroit Community-Academic Urban Research Center and its affiliated partnerships.

CONCLUSION

In this article, we community partners provide our assessment of the benefits and challenges in using a CBPR approach at the personal, organizational, and community levels; the factors that facilitate effective partnerships; and our lessons learned through engagement in CBPR. We also present specific recommendations from a community perspective to researchers and institutions interested in conducting CBPR.

摘要

背景

关于基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)以及社区 - 学术伙伴关系的作用,已有大量文献,其中很多都让社区伙伴参与到出版物的概念化和准备工作中。然而,鉴于社区成员和社区组织(CBOs)领导者的其他角色和职责,专门论述这些主题的社区声音相对较少。

目的

本文旨在分享三位长期(超过20年)参与底特律社区 - 学术城市研究中心及其附属伙伴关系的社区伙伴的观点。

结论

在本文中,我们这些社区伙伴对在个人、组织和社区层面采用CBPR方法的益处和挑战、促进有效伙伴关系的因素以及我们通过参与CBPR所学到的经验教训进行了评估。我们还从社区角度向有兴趣开展CBPR的研究人员和机构提出了具体建议。

相似文献

1
Community Partner Perspectives on Benefits, Challenges, Facilitating Factors, and Lessons Learned from Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships in Detroit.社区合作伙伴对底特律基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系的益处、挑战、促进因素及经验教训的看法
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):299-311. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0031.
2
Practical Tips for Establishing Partnerships With Academic Researchers: A Resource Guide for Community-Based Organizations.与学术研究人员建立合作关系的实用技巧:社区组织资源指南。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):203-12. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0042.
3
Measuring Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships: The Initial Development of an Assessment Instrument.衡量基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系:一种评估工具的初步开发。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Winter;9(4):549-60. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0077.
4
Challenges and facilitating factors in sustaining community-based participatory research partnerships: lessons learned from the Detroit, New York City and Seattle Urban Research Centers.维持基于社区的参与性研究伙伴关系中的挑战与促进因素:来自底特律、纽约市和西雅图城市研究中心的经验教训
J Urban Health. 2006 Nov;83(6):1022-40. doi: 10.1007/s11524-006-9110-1.
5
Qualitative Research and Community-Based Participatory Research: Considerations for Effective Dissemination in the Peer-Reviewed Literature.定性研究与基于社区的参与性研究:医学专业学术文献中有效传播的考量因素
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2015 Summer;9(2):275-82. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2015.0041.
6
Walk together children with no wasted steps: community-academic partnering for equal power in NIH proposal development.孩子们携手同行,不浪费一步:社区与学术机构合作,在国立卫生研究院提案制定中实现平等权力。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010 Winter;4(4):263-77. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2010.0013.
7
Perceptions of Empowerment Within and Across Partnerships in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Dyadic Interview Analysis.社区参与式研究中伙伴关系内部及跨伙伴关系的赋权认知:二元访谈分析
Qual Health Res. 2016 Jan;26(1):105-16. doi: 10.1177/1049732315577606. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
8
Building capacity for community-based participatory research for health disparities in Canada: the case of "Partnerships in Community Health Research".建设加拿大基于社区的参与性健康差异研究能力:以“社区健康研究伙伴关系”为例。
Health Promot Pract. 2011 Mar;12(2):280-92. doi: 10.1177/1524839909355520. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
9
Voices of Community Partners: Perspectives Gained from Conversations of Community-Based Participatory Research Experiences.社区合作伙伴的声音:从基于社区的参与式研究经验的对话中获得的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 21;17(14):5245. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145245.
10
Growing partners: building a community-academic partnership to address health disparities in rural North Carolina.不断发展的合作伙伴:建立社区与学术机构的伙伴关系以解决北卡罗来纳州农村地区的健康差异问题。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014 Summer;8(2):181-6. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2014.0021.

引用本文的文献

1
The "Best of Both Worlds": Building a community-academic partnership for research with legal system-impacted individuals.“两全其美”:建立社区与学术机构的伙伴关系,以便与受法律系统影响的个人开展研究。
Am J Community Psychol. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.70004.
2
Design and implementation of a Community Expert Group comprised of people with lived expertise of homelessness at an academic health research center: a program description and analysis of challenges.学术健康研究中心内由有过无家可归生活经历的人组成的社区专家小组的设计与实施:项目描述及挑战分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 15;11(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00733-z.
3
Black community member perceptions and ethics recommendations on epigenomic research.
黑人社区成员对表观基因组研究的看法及伦理建议。
Clin Epigenetics. 2025 Feb 22;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13148-025-01840-0.
4
Investigating the Best Practices for Engagement in Remote Participatory Design: Mixed Methods Analysis of 4 Remote Studies With Family Caregivers.探究远程参与式设计中的最佳实践:对四项与家庭照顾者开展的远程研究的混合方法分析
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 3;26:e60353. doi: 10.2196/60353.
5
Exploring community-based participatory research for household and ambient air pollution projects: insights from key informants.探索基于社区的参与式研究在家庭和环境空气污染项目中的应用:主要知情人的见解。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 16;24(1):2233. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19614-3.
6
Community-Based Participatory Research for Epidemiology, Health Equity, and Community Goals: Insights From Brazil, France, and USA.基于社区的流行病学、健康公平与社区目标参与式研究:来自巴西、法国和美国的见解
Community Health Equity Res Policy. 2025 Jul;45(4):385-393. doi: 10.1177/2752535X241262857. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
7
Future Directions for Community-Engaged Research in Clinical Psychological Science with Youth.未来方向:临床心理科学中的社区参与式研究与青年。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2024 May-Jun;53(3):503-522. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2024.2359650. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
8
Cultivating an Ecosystem: A Qualitative Exploration of Sustainability in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships.培育生态系统:对长期社区为基础的参与式研究伙伴关系可持续性的定性探索。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2023;17(3):e5.
9
Understanding uptake of COVID-19 testing, vaccination, and boosters among Spanish-speaking Latines in the United States: Qualitative insights from Spanish speakers and key informants.了解在美国讲西班牙语的拉丁裔人群对 COVID-19 检测、疫苗接种和加强针的接受情况:来自西班牙语使用者和主要信息提供者的定性见解。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0296812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296812. eCollection 2024.
10
"They should've talked to us more": lay health advisors' experiences with community-engaged hypertension research.“他们本应多和我们交流”:非专业健康顾问参与社区高血压研究的经历
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jan 25;10(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00544-8.