Suppr超能文献

反思性反应风格与健康女性对情绪面部表情的感知呈负性偏差有关,这些女性没有临床抑郁病史。

Ruminative response style is associated with a negative bias in the perception of emotional facial expressions in healthy women without a history of clinical depression.

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Semmelweisstr. 10, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Semmelweisstr. 10, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;62:125-132. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Rumination has been shown to be an important cognitive vulnerability factor affecting development and maintenance of depression. Ruminative thinking can be divided into a self-focused component referring to persistent reflection about causes and consequences of depressed mood and a symptom-focused component characterized by repetitive thinking about depressive symptoms. Previous research on clinical depression has shown that rumination is associated with the perception of negative emotions in others' facial expressions. The present study was conducted to investigate the relation between habitual rumination and negative bias in face perception in healthy individuals.

METHODS

100 healthy young women without a history of clinical depression completed the Response Styles Questionnaire along with measures of depressive symptoms, dysfunctional attitudes, and anxiety. A computer-based version of the perception of facial expressions questionnaire using line drawings (schematic faces) was administered to assess perceived emotions in faces with ambiguous and unambiguous emotional expressions.

RESULTS

According to hierarchical regression analyses, symptom-based (but not self-focused) rumination predicted perceived negative emotions in ambiguous as well as in unambiguous negative faces after controlling for current depressive symptoms, state and trait anxiety, intelligence, and dysfunctional attitudes.

LIMITATIONS

Generalization of the present findings is limited by the fact that only women were included as study participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Habitual ruminating about depressive symptoms in healthy, never clinically depressed individuals goes along with a negative bias in the perception of others' facial expressions. Negatively biasing social perception might be one mechanism by which symptom-focused rumination might increase vulnerability for depression.

摘要

背景与目的

反刍思维被认为是影响抑郁发生和发展的重要认知易感性因素。反刍思维可以分为自我聚焦成分,指的是对抑郁情绪的原因和后果的持续反思,以及症状聚焦成分,其特征是对抑郁症状的反复思考。先前对临床抑郁症的研究表明,反刍与对他人面部表情中负面情绪的感知有关。本研究旨在调查健康个体中习惯性反刍与对面部感知的负面偏差之间的关系。

方法

100 名无临床抑郁症病史的健康年轻女性完成了反应风格问卷,以及抑郁症状、功能失调态度和焦虑的测量。使用线图(示意图)进行基于计算机的面部表情感知问卷,以评估具有模糊和明确情感表达的面孔中感知到的情绪。

结果

根据层次回归分析,在控制当前抑郁症状、状态和特质焦虑、智力和功能失调态度后,基于症状的(而非自我聚焦的)反刍预测了对模糊和明确负面面孔中感知到的负面情绪。

局限性

本研究结果的推广受到仅纳入女性作为研究参与者的限制。

结论

在从未患有临床抑郁症的健康个体中,习惯性地对抑郁症状进行反刍,会导致对面部表情感知的负面偏差。对社会感知的负面偏差可能是症状聚焦反刍增加抑郁易感性的机制之一。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验