Schölch S, Reißfelder C
Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin & Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.
Chirurg. 2019 Mar;90(3):178-182. doi: 10.1007/s00104-018-0756-5.
For decades, the mandatory treatment for acute uncomplicated appendicitis was urgent appendicectomy. This dogma has now been questioned by several randomized controlled trials, which demonstrated the safety of antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis without increased morbidity and mortality. The efficacy of this conservative treatment, however, is inferior to surgery: Within the first year after antibiotic treatment of acute appendicitis, approximately 30% of patients require appendicectomy. Within 5 years the rate of appendicectomy increases to 40% and the life-long risk of appendicectomy after conservative treatment can be expected to be even higher. The advantages of conservative treatment of appendicitis are faster recovery and the lack of postoperative wound pain; however, all currently available trials compared conservative treatment almost exclusively with conventional appendicectomy, trials comparing laparoscopic appendicectomy to antibiotics are currently not available. As laparoscopic appendicectomy is a well-established and safe treatment ubiquitously available in Germany, conservative treatment in patients with uncomplicated appendicitis cannot generally be recommended. As antibiotic treatment is a less effective but equally safe procedure, it can be offered to selected patients only.
几十年来,急性单纯性阑尾炎的强制治疗方法是紧急阑尾切除术。现在,这一教条受到了多项随机对照试验的质疑,这些试验表明,抗生素治疗单纯性阑尾炎是安全的,不会增加发病率和死亡率。然而,这种保守治疗的疗效不如手术:在急性阑尾炎接受抗生素治疗后的第一年内,约30%的患者需要进行阑尾切除术。5年内,阑尾切除术的比例增至40%,保守治疗后阑尾切除术的终生风险预计会更高。阑尾炎保守治疗的优点是恢复更快,且术后无伤口疼痛;然而,目前所有可用的试验几乎都是将保守治疗与传统阑尾切除术进行比较,目前尚无比较腹腔镜阑尾切除术与抗生素治疗的试验。由于腹腔镜阑尾切除术在德国是一种成熟且安全的普遍可用的治疗方法,因此一般不建议对单纯性阑尾炎患者进行保守治疗。由于抗生素治疗效果较差但同样安全,因此只能提供给选定的患者。