Suppr超能文献

随机临床试验比较抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎:荟萃分析。

Randomized clinical trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendicectomy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis: meta-analysis.

机构信息

Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2022 Jul 7;6(4). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac100.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This aim of this study was to provide an updated meta-analysis comparing antibiotic therapy with appendicectomy in adults (16 years or older) with uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

METHODS

A search for randomized clinical trials comparing antibiotic therapy with appendicectomy in adults with uncomplicated acute appendicitis from inception to 3 October 2021 in MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL with no language constraints was performed. Studies were excluded if they included paediatric participants or those with complicated appendicitis. Data on complications of treatment, treatment efficacy (defined in the antibiotic group as not undergoing appendicectomy within 1 year of enrolment, versus surgery without complications or no negative histology in the appendicectomy group), readmissions, and length of stay (LOS) were presented.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs involving 3203 participants (1613 antibiotics/1590 appendicectomy; 2041 males/1162 females) were included. There was no significant benefit of antibiotic treatment on complication rates (risk ratio (RR) 0.66, 95 per cent c.i. 0.41 to 1.04). Antibiotics had a reduced treatment efficacy compared with appendicectomy (RR 0.75, 95 per cent c.i. 0.63 to 0.89). Antibiotic treatment at 1 year was successful in 1016 of 1613 (62.9 per cent) participants. There was a six-fold increase in hospital readmissions within 1 year of enrolment in participants receiving antibiotic treatment (RR 6.28, 95 per cent c.i. 2.87 to 13.74). There was no difference in index admission LOS (mean difference 0.15 days (95 per cent c.i. -0.05 to 0.35)).

CONCLUSIONS

Earlier optimism regarding the benefits of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis does not persist at the same level now that further, large trials have been included. If antibiotic treatment is to be offered routinely as first-line therapy, patients should be counselled appropriately.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在提供一项更新的荟萃分析,比较单纯性急性阑尾炎成人(16 岁及以上)中抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术的疗效。

方法

从建库至 2021 年 10 月 3 日,我们在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CENTRAL 中检索了比较单纯性急性阑尾炎成人中抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术的随机临床试验,无语言限制。如果研究纳入儿科患者或复杂性阑尾炎患者,则将其排除。研究报告了治疗并发症、治疗效果(在抗生素组定义为入组后 1 年内未行阑尾切除术,而在阑尾切除术组定义为无并发症或组织学阴性)、再入院率和住院时间(LOS)。

结果

纳入 8 项 RCT 共计 3203 名患者(抗生素组 1613 例,阑尾切除术组 1590 例;男性 2041 例,女性 1162 例)。抗生素治疗在降低并发症发生率方面无显著获益(风险比[RR]0.66,95%置信区间[CI]0.41 至 1.04)。与阑尾切除术相比,抗生素治疗的治疗效果降低(RR 0.75,95%CI 0.63 至 0.89)。抗生素治疗 1 年后,1613 名患者中有 1016 名(62.9%)治疗成功。接受抗生素治疗的患者在入组后 1 年内的住院再入院率增加了 6 倍(RR 6.28,95%CI 2.87 至 13.74)。首次入院 LOS 无差异(平均差值 0.15 天(95%CI -0.05 至 0.35))。

结论

随着进一步的大型试验纳入,现在对于单纯性急性阑尾炎抗生素治疗的益处,早期的乐观态度已不复存在。如果抗生素治疗要作为一线治疗常规应用,应适当告知患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a4b/9379374/353a80a928d1/zrac100f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验