• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在翻修膝关节置换术中,无论锥角如何,骨水泥固定的锥形柄比圆柱形柄更容易取出。

Cemented conical stems can be removed more easily than cylindrical stems, regardless of cone angle in revision knee arthroplasty.

作者信息

Maslaris Alexander, Layher Frank, Brinkmann Olaf, Bungartz Matthias, Zippelius Timo, Matziolis Georg

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Campus Eisenberg, Klosterlausnitzer Straße 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Germany.

Department of Orthopedics, Laboratory of Biomechanics, Friedrich-Schiller-University of Jena, Campus Eisenberg, Klosterlausnitzer Straße 81, 07607, Eisenberg, Germany.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Dec;138(12):1747-1754. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3053-3. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-018-3053-3
PMID:30367254
Abstract

BACKGROUND

According to literature, more than 30% of revised knee arthroplasties will require at least one re-revision. Practical experience has shown that there are considerable product-specific differences in the explantability of cemented long-stem prostheses. In the registers of successful implants, stem geometry varies considerably between the manufacturers. However, comparative data on explantability of the respective stems are missing. Objective of the present study was to identify a correlation between the geometry of a smooth cemented long stem and the necessary explantation energy required until failure of the implant-cement interface occurs.

METHODS

Eight cemented stems with different conical profile angles (0°-3°) were explanted in a reproducible biomechanical setup each six times to evaluate the correlation between the stem design and the required explantation energy.

RESULTS

The average explantation energy was highest in the case of the cylindrical stem, at 18.1 ± 3.6 J. At a cone angle of 0.25°, it was just 12.1 ± 2.1 J (p < 0.001) and dropped beyond 0.5° to an average of 5.7 ± 1.8 J (p < 0.001). Between 0.5° and 3°, no significant difference in the required extraction energy was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Whereas smooth conical stems can mostly be removed easily, an early decision in favour of osteotomy or fenestration can be taken in the case of cylindrical cemented stems.

摘要

背景

根据文献,超过30%的翻修膝关节置换术将需要至少一次再次翻修。实践经验表明,骨水泥固定长柄假体的取出难易程度存在显著的产品特异性差异。在成功植入物的登记记录中,不同制造商的柄部几何形状差异很大。然而,关于各个柄部取出难易程度的比较数据却缺失。本研究的目的是确定光滑骨水泥固定长柄的几何形状与植入物 - 骨水泥界面失效前所需的取出能量之间的相关性。

方法

八个具有不同圆锥轮廓角(0° - 3°)的骨水泥柄在可重复的生物力学装置中每次取出六次,以评估柄部设计与所需取出能量之间的相关性。

结果

圆柱形柄的平均取出能量最高,为18.1 ± 3.6焦耳。在圆锥角为0.25°时,仅为12.1 ± 2.1焦耳(p < 0.001),超过0.5°后降至平均5.7 ± 1.8焦耳(p < 0.001)。在0.5°至3°之间,未观察到所需取出能量的显著差异。

结论

虽然光滑的圆锥形柄大多可以轻松取出,但对于圆柱形骨水泥柄,可尽早决定采用截骨术或开窗术。

相似文献

1
Cemented conical stems can be removed more easily than cylindrical stems, regardless of cone angle in revision knee arthroplasty.在翻修膝关节置换术中,无论锥角如何,骨水泥固定的锥形柄比圆柱形柄更容易取出。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Dec;138(12):1747-1754. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3053-3. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
2
Sagittal profile has a significant impact on the explantability of well-fixed cemented stems in revision knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical comparison study of five established knee implant models.矢状位形态对翻修膝关节置换术中固定良好的水泥固定柄的可取出性有显著影响:五种已确立的膝关节植入物模型的生物力学比较研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Jul;139(7):991-998. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03160-4. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
3
Impact of stem profile on the revisability and the need for osteotomy in well-fixed cemented revision total knee arthroplasty implants.股骨柄形态对固定良好的水泥型翻修全膝关节置换假体可翻修性及截骨需要的影响。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jan;143(1):469-479. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04559-2. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
4
Do Metaphyseal Cones and Stems Provide Any Biomechanical Advantage for Moderate Contained Tibial Defects in Revision TKA? A Finite-Element Analysis Based on a Cadaver Model.干骺端圆锥和干骺端柱对于翻修 TKA 中度包容胫骨缺损的生物力学有优势吗?基于尸体模型的有限元分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Nov 1;479(11):2534-2546. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001912.
5
Does stem profile have an impact on the failure patterns in revision total knee arthroplasty?胫骨假体轮廓对翻修全膝关节置换术后假体失败模式是否有影响?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Mar;143(3):1549-1569. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04683-z. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
6
Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.在使用骨水泥固定柄的 416 例翻修全膝关节置换术中,采用内翻-外翻限制技术可提供可靠的重建,在早期至中期随访中具有较低的后续翻修率。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Apr;102-B(4):458-462. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2019-0719.R2.
7
Aseptic midterm survival rates between different cemented tibial stem designs in hinged total knee arthroplasty: a 6-year evaluation from the German Arthroplasty Registry.不同铰链式全膝关节置换术固定胫骨柄设计的无菌中期生存率:德国关节置换登记处的 6 年评估。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 May;144(5):2283-2295. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05273-x. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
8
Cemented tibial stems are not requisite in revision.翻修时骨水泥型胫骨柄并非必需。
Orthopedics. 2004 Sep;27(9):991-2. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-20040901-42.
9
Comparative Biomechanical In Vitro Study of Different Modular Total Knee Arthroplasty Revision Stems With Bone Defects.不同带骨缺损的模块化全膝关节翻修柄的体外比较生物力学研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3318-3325. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.035. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
10
Failure at the Tibial Cement-Implant Interface With the Use of High-Viscosity Cement in Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中使用高粘度骨水泥时胫骨骨水泥-植入物界面出现的失败情况。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Nov;31(11):2579-2582. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.063. Epub 2016 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Aseptic midterm survival rates between different cemented tibial stem designs in hinged total knee arthroplasty: a 6-year evaluation from the German Arthroplasty Registry.不同铰链式全膝关节置换术固定胫骨柄设计的无菌中期生存率:德国关节置换登记处的 6 年评估。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 May;144(5):2283-2295. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05273-x. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
2
Does stem profile have an impact on the failure patterns in revision total knee arthroplasty?胫骨假体轮廓对翻修全膝关节置换术后假体失败模式是否有影响?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Mar;143(3):1549-1569. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04683-z. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Tibial revision knee arthroplasty with metaphyseal sleeves: The effect of stems on implant fixation and bone flexibility.带干骺端套筒的胫骨翻修膝关节置换术:柄对植入物固定和骨柔韧性的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 May 8;12(5):e0177285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177285. eCollection 2017.
2
Does the tibia component design affect the need for offset stems in revision total knee arthroplasty?胫骨部件设计是否会影响翻修全膝关节置换术中对偏置柄的需求?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jun;137(6):853-860. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2677-z. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
3
[Cemented stems in revision total knee arthroplasty on patients older than 75 y/o. Clinical and radiological analysis].
Impact of stem profile on the revisability and the need for osteotomy in well-fixed cemented revision total knee arthroplasty implants.
股骨柄形态对固定良好的水泥型翻修全膝关节置换假体可翻修性及截骨需要的影响。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jan;143(1):469-479. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04559-2. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
[75岁以上患者翻修全膝关节置换术中的骨水泥型股骨柄。临床与影像学分析]
Acta Ortop Mex. 2016 Mar-Apr;30(2):85-90.
4
Fixation techniques and stem dimensions in hinged total knee arthroplasty: a finite element study.铰链式全膝关节置换术中的固定技术和柄部尺寸:一项有限元研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Dec;136(12):1741-1752. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2571-0. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
5
Perioperative Complications and Length of Stay After Revision Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: An Analysis of the NSQIP Database.翻修全髋关节和膝关节置换术后的围手术期并发症及住院时间:NSQIP数据库分析
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Nov;30(11):1868-71. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.029. Epub 2015 May 22.
6
Risk factors for venous thromboembolism after total hip and total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.全髋关节置换术和全膝关节置换术后静脉血栓栓塞的危险因素:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):759-72. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2208-8. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
7
Increasing obesity and comorbidity in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty in the U.S.: a 13-year study of time trends.美国初次全髋关节置换术患者肥胖及合并症增加情况:一项为期13年的时间趋势研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Dec 17;15:441. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-441.
8
Risk factors for revision within 10 years of total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后 10 年内翻修的风险因素。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Apr;472(4):1198-207. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3416-6. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
9
Systematic review comparing static and articulating spacers used for revision of infected total knee arthroplasty.比较用于感染性全膝关节置换翻修术的静态和可活动间隔器的系统评价。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Mar;29(3):553-7.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.041. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
10
Risk factors for total knee arthroplasty aseptic revision.全膝关节置换术无菌翻修的危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8 Suppl):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.04.050. Epub 2013 Aug 15.