• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残疾是否会妨碍信息通信技术的使用?一项重复横断面研究(2003 - 2015年)的结果

Do disabilities impede the use of information and communication technologies? Findings of a repeated cross-sectional study - 2003-2015.

作者信息

Lissitsa Sabina, Madar Galit

机构信息

School of Communication, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.

Faculty of Health Sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.

出版信息

Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Oct 26;7(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0260-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13584-018-0260-x
PMID:30367657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6204019/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current research focuses on trends of Internet adoption and digital uses among people with disabilities over a thirteen-year period.

METHODS

The study is based on data elicited from a repeated cross-sectional study collected by means of Annual Social Surveys conducted by Israel's Central Bureau of Statistics between 2003 and 2015. The sample included 95,145 respondents, among them 22,290 respondents with disabilities.

RESULTS

The rate of Internet access and digital uses increased continuously among disabled people; however the gap between them and the population without disabilities was preserved. We found that Internet use depends on a number of socio-economic characteristic. Socio-demographic variables were much more powerful in predicting Internet use vs non-use among the total population, compared to predicting digital uses among Internet users.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings make it possible to identify disadvantaged groups in which disability intersects with low rates of Internet adoption and belonging to unprivileged groups: Arabs, the religious, the elderly, lower SES individuals. The effects of most of these variables did not change in the period under study. Generally, we recommend finding a way to promote courses that focus on promoting digital literacy in general and eHealth literacy in particular in small groups of people of similar age, digital skill level and motor / health problems. Considering the high representation of Arabs among people with disabilities and lower rates of Internet adoption and use among Arabs, it is recommended that efforts continue to increase the scope and quality of Arabic language content published on Israeli eHealth sites. In order to diminish income-based digital divide we recommend providing publicly accessible free information technologies, for example, in community clubs, senior citizen clubs, and independent- and assisted- living projects for the disabled.

摘要

背景

当前研究聚焦于13年间残疾人互联网使用及数字应用的趋势。

方法

该研究基于以色列中央统计局在2003年至2015年期间通过年度社会调查收集的重复横断面研究得出的数据。样本包括95145名受访者,其中22290名残疾受访者。

结果

残疾人的互联网接入率和数字应用率持续上升;然而他们与非残疾人群体之间的差距依然存在。我们发现互联网使用取决于一些社会经济特征。与预测互联网用户的数字应用相比,社会人口统计学变量在预测总人口中互联网使用与否方面的作用要强大得多。

结论

我们的研究结果使得识别弱势群体成为可能,在这些群体中,残疾与低互联网使用率以及属于弱势群体(阿拉伯人、宗教人士、老年人、社会经济地位较低者)相互交织。在研究期间,这些变量中的大多数影响并未改变。总体而言,我们建议找到一种方法来推广课程,这些课程尤其注重在年龄、数字技能水平和运动/健康问题相似的小群体中提升数字素养,特别是电子健康素养。鉴于阿拉伯人在残疾人中占比高且阿拉伯人的互联网采用率和使用率较低,建议继续努力扩大以色列电子健康网站上发布的阿拉伯语内容的范围并提高其质量。为了缩小基于收入的数字鸿沟,我们建议提供可公开访问的免费信息技术,例如,在社区俱乐部、老年人俱乐部以及针对残疾人的独立生活和辅助生活项目中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9253/6204019/d8aef734b9e7/13584_2018_260_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9253/6204019/bd23b85afee7/13584_2018_260_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9253/6204019/15bd53592daa/13584_2018_260_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9253/6204019/63efd6d99ebb/13584_2018_260_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9253/6204019/d8aef734b9e7/13584_2018_260_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9253/6204019/bd23b85afee7/13584_2018_260_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9253/6204019/15bd53592daa/13584_2018_260_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9253/6204019/63efd6d99ebb/13584_2018_260_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9253/6204019/d8aef734b9e7/13584_2018_260_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Do disabilities impede the use of information and communication technologies? Findings of a repeated cross-sectional study - 2003-2015.残疾是否会妨碍信息通信技术的使用?一项重复横断面研究(2003 - 2015年)的结果
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018 Oct 26;7(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0260-x.
2
Exploring the disparity in tangible outcomes of internet use between persons with disabilities and persons without disabilities in South Korea.探讨韩国残疾人和非残疾人在互联网使用方面实际成果差距。
Disabil Health J. 2021 Jul;14(3):101101. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101101. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
3
Digital divide among people with disabilities: Analysis of data from a nationwide study for determinants of Internet use and activities performed online.残疾人中的数字鸿沟:对一项全国性研究数据的分析,该研究旨在探讨互联网使用及在线活动的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179825. eCollection 2017.
4
Assessing Electronic Health Literacy in the State of Kuwait: Survey of Internet Users From an Arab State.科威特国电子健康素养评估:对一个阿拉伯国家互联网用户的调查
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 24;21(5):e11174. doi: 10.2196/11174.
5
The Moderating Effects of Disability on Mobile Internet Use Among Older Adults: Population-Based Cross-sectional Study.残疾对老年人移动互联网使用的调节作用:基于人口的横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 4;24(4):e37127. doi: 10.2196/37127.
6
The Association of Internet Use with Wellbeing, Mental Health and Health Behaviours of Persons with Disabilities.互联网使用与残疾人士的幸福感、心理健康和健康行为的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 4;16(18):3252. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183252.
7
The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use.低收入居家老年人中的数字鸿沟:互联网使用模式、电子健康素养以及对计算机/互联网使用的态度。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 May 2;15(5):e93. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2645.
8
Health information seeking in the digital age: a national survey of women with disabilities.数字时代的健康信息寻求:一项全国残疾女性调查。
Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Aug;45(17):2751-2760. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2105960. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
9
Listening to Communities: Mixed-Method Study of the Engagement of Disadvantaged Mothers and Pregnant Women With Digital Health Technologies.倾听社区声音:对弱势母亲和孕妇参与数字健康技术情况的混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 5;19(7):e240. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7736.
10
eHealth literacy: extending the digital divide to the realm of health information.电子健康素养:将数字鸿沟扩展至健康信息领域。
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jan 27;14(1):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1619.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the perspectives of health care professionals on digital health technologies in pediatric care and rehabilitation.探讨医疗保健专业人员对儿科护理和康复中数字健康技术的看法。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Sep 12;21(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01431-9.
2
A Lesson from the Pandemic: Utilizing Digital Tools To Support Student Engagement during Instructional Assistant-Led Sessions.疫情带来的一课:在教学助理主导的课程中利用数字工具支持学生参与度。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2022 Oct 13;23(3). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00143-22. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Digital exclusion and functional dependence in older people: Findings from five longitudinal cohort studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital divide among people with disabilities: Analysis of data from a nationwide study for determinants of Internet use and activities performed online.残疾人中的数字鸿沟:对一项全国性研究数据的分析,该研究旨在探讨互联网使用及在线活动的决定因素。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0179825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179825. eCollection 2017.
2
The Doctor Versus the Internet: Effects of Low-, Medium-, and High-Quality Websites on Intentions to Follow the Doctor's Advice.医生与互联网的较量:低、中、高质量网站对遵循医生建议的意愿的影响。
Health Commun. 2017 Dec;32(12):1454-1462. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1228030. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
3
老年人的数字排斥与功能依赖:五项纵向队列研究的结果
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Oct 31;54:101708. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101708. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Telemedicine Use Among Physiatrists During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Potential for Future Use.远程医疗在 COVID-19 大流行早期的物理治疗师中的使用情况以及未来的使用潜力。
Telemed J E Health. 2023 Feb;29(2):242-252. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0030. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
5
Attitudes towards influenza, and COVID-19 vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic among a representative sample of the Jewish Israeli population.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,对代表性的以色列犹太人群体中的流感和 COVID-19 疫苗的态度。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 11;17(2):e0255495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255495. eCollection 2022.
6
Information and communication technologies: where are persons with intellectual disabilities?信息与通信技术:智力残疾者身处何方?
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019 Jan 9;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13584-018-0282-4.
Associations of eHealth Literacy With Health Behavior Among Adult Internet Users.
成年互联网用户的电子健康素养与健康行为的关联。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jul 18;18(7):e192. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5413.
4
Israel: Health System Review.以色列:卫生系统评估
Health Syst Transit. 2015;17(6):1-212.
5
Computer and Internet Interventions to Optimize Listening and Learning for People With Hearing Loss: Accessibility, Use, and Adherence.用于优化听力损失患者听力和学习的计算机与互联网干预措施:可及性、使用情况及依从性
Am J Audiol. 2015 Sep;24(3):338-43. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJA-14-0090.
6
eHealth literacy and Web 2.0 health information seeking behaviors among baby boomers and older adults.婴儿潮一代和老年人的电子健康素养与Web 2.0健康信息搜索行为
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 17;17(3):e70. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3992.
7
ICT and the future of health care: aspects of doctor-patient communication.信息通信技术与医疗保健的未来:医患沟通的若干方面
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Jul;30(3):298-305. doi: 10.1017/S0266462314000294.
8
Web accessibility standards and disability: developing critical perspectives on accessibility.网络无障碍标准与残疾:形成关于无障碍的批判性观点
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(16):1375-83. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.938178. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
9
A systematic review of eHealth interventions to improve health literacy.一项关于改善健康素养的电子健康干预措施的系统评价。
Health Informatics J. 2016 Jun;22(2):81-98. doi: 10.1177/1460458214534092. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
10
Stigma of a label: educational expectations for high school students labeled with learning disabilities.标签的污名:对被贴上学习障碍标签的高中生的教育期望
J Health Soc Behav. 2013;54(4):462-80. doi: 10.1177/0022146513503346.