Ernst Markus J, Meichtry André, Luedtke Kerstin, Falla Deborah
Centre of Precision Rehabilitation for Spinal Pain, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Institute of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Katharina-Sulzer Platz 9, Winterthur, 8401, Switzerland.
J Headache Pain. 2025 Feb 12;26(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s10194-025-01963-y.
Headache conditions have a high prevalence worldwide. Office workers with high and demanding workload, but low physical activity levels are considered vulnerable for suffering from headache. This analysis examines whether exercise combined with health promotion at the workplace is effective for headache relief in office workers.
This study reports the results of secondary outcomes of a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Office workers (n = 120) were randomly assigned to a twelve-week supervised intervention period, consisting of neck and shoulder girdle exercises with health promotion interventions performed at the workplace. Secondary outcomes were analysed and modelled for headache occurrence, frequency, and the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), accounting for possible effects for the intervention, the period it had been introduced, and interactional and nested effects.
At baseline, 88 of the 120 participants reported ≥ one headache episode in the past four weeks, with a mean headache frequency of 3.58 days for that period. The mean HIT-6 score for the entire cohort amounted to 53.6 points. For headache occurrence and HIT-6, the simplest model with the intervention only, showed the best statistical fit with an odds ratio for headache occurrence of 0.46 (95% confidence interval: 0.25 to 0.84), and - 2.23 (95% confidence interval: -3.35 to -1.12) points on the HIT-6 questionnaire. For headache frequency, the model accounting for interaction effects (intervention x period) had the best statistical fit and showed an incidence rate ratio of 0.57 (95% confidence interval: 0.44 to 0.74) for the first period, but not for later ones.
Neck exercises and health promotion had a positive impact on headache occurrence, headache frequency and HIT-6, with the latter not reaching clinical importance. Although only statistically significant for headache frequency, larger effects were found during earlier periods or shorter interventional exposure for all outcomes, necessitating refresher sessions at later periods.
NCT04169646.
头痛病症在全球范围内的患病率很高。工作量大且要求苛刻,但身体活动水平低的上班族被认为易患头痛。本分析旨在研究 workplace 结合健康促进措施的锻炼对缓解上班族头痛是否有效。
本研究报告了一项阶梯式楔形整群随机对照试验的次要结果。上班族(n = 120)被随机分配到一个为期 12 周的有监督的干预期,该干预期包括在 workplace 进行的颈部和肩带锻炼以及健康促进干预措施。对头痛的发生、频率以及头痛影响测试-6(HIT-6)的次要结果进行了分析和建模,同时考虑了干预措施、引入干预措施的时间段以及交互作用和嵌套效应的可能影响。
在基线时,120 名参与者中有 88 人报告在过去四周内有≥1 次头痛发作,该期间的平均头痛频率为 3.58 天。整个队列的平均 HIT-6 评分为 53.6 分。对于头痛的发生和 HIT-6,仅包含干预措施的最简单模型显示出最佳的统计拟合,头痛发生的优势比为 0.46(95%置信区间:0.25 至 0.84),在 HIT-6 问卷上为-2.23(95%置信区间:-3.35 至-1.12)分。对于头痛频率,考虑交互作用(干预×时间段)的模型具有最佳的统计拟合,并且在第一个时间段显示出发病率比为 0.57(95%置信区间:0.44 至 0.74),但在后续时间段则不然。
颈部锻炼和健康促进对头痛的发生、头痛频率和 HIT-6 有积极影响,后者未达到临床重要性。虽然仅对头痛频率具有统计学意义,但在所有结果的早期或较短干预暴露期间发现了更大的影响,因此在后期需要进行复习课程。
NCT04169646。