• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防结直肠癌或早期诊断:哪种更好?美国预防服务工作组证据报告的再分析。

Preventing colorectal cancer or early diagnosis: Which is best? A re-analysis of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Report.

机构信息

Departments of Emergency Medicine, Family Medicine, and Surgery, Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta Regional Hospital, 700 Chief Eddie Hoffman Highway, Bethel, AK 99559, USA.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2019 Jan;118:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.014. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.014
PMID:30367971
Abstract

Flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is the only cancer screening test to lower the risk of death compared to usual care in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We hypothesize that this unique death reduction is more attributable to prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) than to early diagnosis. The systematic review of the 2016 US Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Report for CRC Screening was used for selection of RCT studies. A random-effects meta-analysis of five FS trials (N = 458,002) and four fecal occult blood test (FOBT) trials (N = 328,767) was performed using intention-to-screen outcomes for death, CRC incidence, and death attributed to CRC; correlation and linear regression analyses explored the relationships between these outcomes. At 10.5-11.9 years of follow-up FS reduces death (relative risk [RR], 0.975; 95% CI, 0.958-0.992 and reduces CRC incidence (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.84). Within the FS trials death reduction shows a strong linear correlation with CRC incidence reduction (r, 0.95; 95% CI 0.42-0.99). At 15.6-30.0 years of follow-up FOBT does not reduce death (RR, 1.001; 95% CI, 0.992-1.010) or CRC incidence (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.89-1.02) but does reduce deaths attributed to CRC (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.78-0.91). Clinical trials of screening FS display a dose-response relationship between the magnitude of CRC prevention and the magnitude of death reduction. Prevention of CRC appears to be the major (or sole) mechanism of action for death reduction by FS in clinical trials. Conversely, early diagnosis of CRC does not appear to reduce death.

摘要

柔性乙状结肠镜检查(FS)是唯一一种在随机对照试验(RCT)中与常规护理相比降低死亡风险的癌症筛查试验。我们假设这种独特的死亡率降低更多归因于结直肠癌(CRC)的预防,而不是早期诊断。对 2016 年美国预防服务工作组 CRC 筛查证据报告的系统评价用于选择 RCT 研究。使用意向筛查结局对死亡、CRC 发病率和归因于 CRC 的死亡进行了五项 FS 试验(N=458002)和四项粪便潜血试验(FOBT)试验(N=328767)的随机效应荟萃分析;相关性和线性回归分析探讨了这些结局之间的关系。在 10.5-11.9 年的随访中,FS 降低了死亡(相对风险 [RR],0.975;95%CI,0.958-0.992)和 CRC 发病率(RR,0.79;95%CI,0.74-0.84)。在 FS 试验中,死亡率降低与 CRC 发病率降低呈强线性相关(r,0.95;95%CI 0.42-0.99)。在 15.6-30.0 年的随访中,FOBT 并未降低死亡(RR,1.001;95%CI,0.992-1.010)或 CRC 发病率(RR,0.96;95%CI,0.89-1.02),但降低了归因于 CRC 的死亡(RR,0.84;95%CI,0.78-0.91)。FS 筛查的临床试验显示 CRC 预防的程度与死亡率降低的程度之间存在剂量反应关系。预防 CRC 似乎是 FS 在临床试验中降低死亡率的主要(或唯一)作用机制。相反,CRC 的早期诊断似乎不会降低死亡率。

相似文献

1
Preventing colorectal cancer or early diagnosis: Which is best? A re-analysis of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Report.预防结直肠癌或早期诊断:哪种更好?美国预防服务工作组证据报告的再分析。
Prev Med. 2019 Jan;118:104-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.014. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
2
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2576-94. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3332.
3
Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy-based screening on incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.基于软性乙状结肠镜检查的筛查对结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的影响:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001352. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
4
Reduced incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer with flexible-sigmoidoscopy screening: a meta-analysis.乙状结肠镜筛查降低结直肠癌发病率和死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 28;20(48):18466-76. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i48.18466.
5
6
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.结直肠癌筛查:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2016 Dec;15(4):298-313. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2016.03.003. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
7
Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.结直肠癌筛查方法的有效性:网络荟萃分析。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Dec;16(4):252-263. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.03.018. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
8
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组的更新证据报告和系统评价。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1978-1998. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417.
9
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.筛查结肠镜检查与乙状结肠镜检查和其他策略的比较效果和成本效益。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;108(1):120-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.380. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
10
Evidence for colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查的证据。
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;24(4):417-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.06.005.

引用本文的文献

1
A preliminary study of further attempt at the development, testing and application of an auxiliary equipment for electronic colonoscopy.电子结肠镜辅助设备开发、测试及应用的进一步尝试的初步研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31128. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82415-6.
2
Strategic use of resources to enhance colorectal cancer screening for patients with diabetes (SURE: CRC4D) in federally qualified health centers: a protocol for hybrid type ii effectiveness-implementation trial.资源的战略性利用以增强联邦合格健康中心中糖尿病患者的结直肠癌筛查(SURE:CRC4D):一项混合 II 型有效性实施试验的方案。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jul 5;25(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02496-0.
3
Effects of sigmoidoscopy screening (including colonoscopy) on colorectal cancer: A -analysis based on randomized controlled trials.
乙状结肠镜检查筛查(包括结肠镜检查)对结直肠癌的影响:基于随机对照试验的分析
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Feb 1;39:102636. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102636. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Re: Interpreting epidemiologic studies of colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer prevention.主题:解读结肠镜检查用于预防结直肠癌的流行病学研究。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2024 Apr;39(4):429. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-01072-7. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
5
Simulation modeling validity and utility in colorectal cancer screening delivery: A systematic review.模拟建模在结直肠癌筛查中的有效性和实用性:系统评价。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jun 1;27(6):908-916. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa022.
6
Use of Simulation Modeling to Inform Decision Making for Health Care Systems and Policy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Protocol for a Systematic Review.利用模拟建模为结直肠癌筛查中的医疗保健系统和政策决策提供信息:一项系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 May 13;9(5):e16103. doi: 10.2196/16103.