van Lange Paul A M, Rinderu Maria I, Bushman Brad J
VU Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ohio State University, USA.
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2018 Apr;21(3):457-471. doi: 10.1177/1368430217735579. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
Aggression and violence levels generally increase as one moves closer to the equator, but why? We developed a new theoretical model, CLimate, Aggression, and Self-control in Humans (CLASH; van Lange, Rinderu, & Bushman, 2017b, 2017c), to understand differences within and between countries in aggression and violence in terms of differences in climate. Colder temperatures, and especially larger degrees of seasonal variation in climate, call for individuals and groups to adopt a slower life history strategy, revealed in a greater focus on the future (vs. present) and a stronger focus on self-control-variables that are known to inhibit aggression and violence. Other variables (e.g., wealth, income inequality, parasite stress) are also linked to both climate differences and to aggression and violence differences. When people think of the consequences of climate change, they rarely think of the impact on aggression and violence levels, but they should. CLASH has broad implications for the effects of climate change on intergroup conflict.
一般来说,随着人们向赤道靠近,攻击和暴力水平会上升,但这是为什么呢?我们开发了一个新的理论模型——人类的气候、攻击与自我控制(CLASH;范兰格、林德鲁和布什曼,2017b,2017c),以根据气候差异来理解国家内部和国家之间在攻击和暴力方面的差异。更低的温度,尤其是更大程度的气候季节变化,要求个人和群体采取更慢的生活史策略,这体现在更关注未来(而非当下)以及更加强调自我控制——这些变量已知会抑制攻击和暴力。其他变量(如财富、收入不平等、寄生虫压力)也与气候差异以及攻击和暴力差异相关联。当人们思考气候变化的后果时,他们很少会想到其对攻击和暴力水平的影响,但他们应该想到。CLASH对气候变化对群体间冲突的影响具有广泛的意义。