Agostini Francesca, Minelli Marianna, Mandolesi Roberta
Department of Psychology, Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 12;9:1911. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01911. eCollection 2018.
Outdoor Education (OE) refers to organized experiential education that takes place in the outdoor, characterized by action-centered and thematic learning processes. Literature shows how OE may have beneficial effects on different areas of child development, including cognitive abilities, social skills, and motor development. This relationship is not necessarily linear, but moderated by different variables. Until now, few studies have examined, using rigorous methods, the role of OE in children's development and studies of preschool aged children remain lacking. The current study aimed to explore teachers' perceptions of children's developmental trajectories over 2 school years, investigating whether teachers' perceptions differed between two kindergartens, one characterized by a consolidated OE approach and the other one characterized by a more traditional method of education. The sample was composed of 20 teachers, evaluating 93 children aged 3-5 ( = 46.95 months, = 6.73; 42 males): 13 teachers were from a traditional kindergarten (Traditional Group- TG) and evaluated 52 children; 7 teachers were from an OE kindergarten (Outdoor Group-OE) and observed 41 children. All the teachers completed the Kuno Beller Developmental Tables (Mantovani, 1995), in order to describe specific child developmental areas in 4 consecutive moments during 2 school years (T1-T2: January-May 2014; T3-T4: October 2014-May 2015). The 20 teachers also completed the "Outdoor Activities/Trips Diary," an instrument created for this study to collect qualitative data on the characteristics of outdoor activities. Results showed that, in all the developmental areas, OE teachers perceived higher scores over time were found for the Outdoor Group compared to the Traditional one. Specifically, GLM ANOVAs Repeated Measures revealed a significant interaction of the 2 variables Time and Groups ( < 0.001): contrast analyses showed that OE children, compared to the TG children, were perceived by their teachers with higher levels in all developmental areas at T1 and T2, but not at T3 and T4. The findings suggest that the OE activites, compared to indoor ones and according to teachers' perceptions, offer greater opportunities to promote the child's development at different levels, especially when children are younger. Future studies are recommended analyzing possible moderating variables and long term effects of OE.
户外教育(OE)是指在户外开展的有组织的体验式教育,其特点是以行动为中心和主题式学习过程。文献表明,户外教育可能对儿童发展的不同领域产生有益影响,包括认知能力、社交技能和运动发展。这种关系不一定是线性的,而是受到不同变量的调节。到目前为止,很少有研究使用严谨的方法来考察户外教育在儿童发展中的作用,针对学龄前儿童的研究仍然匮乏。本研究旨在探讨教师对儿童在两个学年发展轨迹的看法,调查两所幼儿园教师的看法是否存在差异,一所幼儿园采用成熟的户外教育方法,另一所采用更传统的教育方法。样本由20名教师组成,他们对93名3至5岁的儿童进行评估(平均年龄 = 46.95个月,标准差 = 6.73;男42名):13名教师来自传统幼儿园(传统组-TG),评估52名儿童;7名教师来自户外教育幼儿园(户外组-OE),观察41名儿童。所有教师都完成了库诺·贝勒发展量表(曼托瓦尼,1995年),以便描述儿童在两个学年中连续4个时间点的特定发展领域(T1-T2:2014年1月至5月;T3-T4:2014年10月至2015年5月)。这20名教师还完成了“户外活动/旅行日记”,这是为本研究创建的一种工具,用于收集有关户外活动特征的定性数据。结果表明,在所有发展领域,与传统组相比,户外组教师随着时间推移感知到的分数更高。具体而言,广义线性模型方差分析重复测量显示,时间和组这两个变量存在显著交互作用(P < 0.001):对比分析表明,与TG组儿童相比,OE组儿童在T1和T2时,教师认为他们在所有发展领域的水平更高,但在T3和T4时并非如此。研究结果表明,与室内活动相比,根据教师的看法,户外教育活动在不同水平上为促进儿童发展提供了更多机会,尤其是在儿童较小时。建议未来的研究分析户外教育可能的调节变量和长期影响。