Taylor Kulp M
The Ohio State University, College of Optometry, Columbus 43210, USA.
Optom Vis Sci. 1999 Mar;76(3):159-63. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199903000-00015.
The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between visual motor integration skill and academic performance in kindergarten through third grade.
One hundred ninety-one (N = 191) children in kindergarten through third grade (mean age = 7.78 years; 52% male) from an upper-middle class, suburban, primarily Caucasian, elementary school near Cleveland, Ohio were included in this investigation. Visual analysis and visual motor integration skill were assessed with the Beery Developmental Test of Visual Motor Integration (VMI) long form because it is a commonly used test in both optometric and educational practice and has a detailed scoring system. The relationship between performance on the VMI and teachers' ratings of academic achievement was analyzed because teachers' grades are a primary means of assessing school performance. The children's regular classroom teachers rated the children with respect to reading, math, and writing ability. Second and third grade children (N = 98) were also rated on spelling ability. Only experienced teachers were included in the investigation and the validity of the teachers' ratings was substantiated by significant correlations with standardized test scores. Teachers were masked to performance on the VMI until the rating was completed. The Stanford Diagnostic Reading test, 4th edition, was also used as a measure of reading ability in the first graders and the Otis-Lennon School Ability test (OLSAT), 6th edition, was also used as a measure of school-related cognitive ability in the second graders.
Performance on the VMI was found to be significantly related to teachers' ratings of the children's reading (p = 0.0001), math (p = 0.0001), writing (p = 0.0001) and spelling (p = 0.0118) ability. An analysis by age group revealed that performance on the VMI was significantly correlated with reading achievement ratings in the 7- and 8- year-olds (p<0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively), with math and writing achievement ratings in the 7-, 8-, and 9-year-olds (math: p<0.001, p = 0.004, and p = 0.003, respectively; writing: p<0.001, p = 0.008, and p = 0.016, respectively), and with spelling achievement ratings in the 8- and 9-year-olds (p = 0.040 and p = 0.007, respectively). VMI scores were also significantly related to performance on the Stanford Reading test in the first graders (p = 0.003) and to performance on the OLSAT in the second graders (verbal score: p = 0.005, nonverbal score: p = 0.002, and total score: p<0.001). In order to partially control for mathematical ability, an additional analysis was performed with children who were identified by the OLSAT as having either below average, average, or above average verbal reasoning scores ability (the verbal reasoning score consists of aural and arithmetic reasoning). This analysis again revealed a significant correlation between the VMI and teachers' achievement ratings in math (p = 0.007 among second grade students with average ability). Finally, in order to partially control for cognitive ability related to writing, an additional analysis was performed with children who were identified by the OLSAT as having either below average, average, or above average nonverbal cluster OLSAT scores. (The nonverbal cluster consists of pictorial and figural reasoning.) This analysis again revealed a significant correlation between the VMI and teachers' achievement ratings in writing (p = 0.001 among average second grade students).
Performance on a visual analysis and visual motor integration task is significantly related to academic performance in 7-, 8- and 9-year-olds.
本研究的目的是考察幼儿园至三年级儿童的视觉运动整合技能与学业成绩之间的关系。
本调查纳入了191名来自俄亥俄州克利夫兰附近一所中上层阶级、郊区、主要为白人的小学的幼儿园至三年级儿童(平均年龄 = 7.78岁;52%为男性)。使用贝利视觉运动整合发育测试(VMI)长版评估视觉分析和视觉运动整合技能,因为它是验光和教育实践中常用的测试,且有详细的评分系统。分析了VMI成绩与教师对学业成绩的评分之间的关系,因为教师评分是评估学校表现的主要方式。儿童的常规课堂教师对儿童的阅读、数学和写作能力进行评分。二、三年级儿童(N = 98)还接受了拼写能力评分。调查仅纳入经验丰富的教师,且教师评分的有效性通过与标准化测试成绩的显著相关性得到证实。在完成评分之前,教师对VMI成绩不知情。一年级学生还使用斯坦福诊断阅读测试第4版作为阅读能力的衡量标准,二年级学生还使用奥蒂斯-列侬学校能力测试(OLSAT)第6版作为与学校相关的认知能力的衡量标准。
发现VMI成绩与教师对儿童阅读(p = 0.0001)、数学(p = 0.0001)、写作(p = 0.0001)和拼写(p = 0.0118)能力的评分显著相关。按年龄组分析显示,VMI成绩与7岁和8岁儿童的阅读成绩评分显著相关(分别为p<0.001和p = 0.002),与7岁、8岁和9岁儿童的数学和写作成绩评分显著相关(数学:分别为p<0.001、p = 0.004和p = 0.003;写作:分别为p<0.001、p = 0.008和p = 0.016),与8岁和9岁儿童的拼写成绩评分显著相关(分别为p = 0.040和p = 0.007)。VMI分数还与一年级学生的斯坦福阅读测试成绩显著相关(p = 0.003),与二年级学生的OLSAT成绩显著相关(言语分数:p = 0.005,非言语分数:p = 0.002,总分:p<0.001)。为了部分控制数学能力,对OLSAT鉴定为言语推理能力低于平均水平、平均水平或高于平均水平的儿童进行了额外分析(言语推理分数由听觉和算术推理组成)。该分析再次显示VMI与教师对数学成绩的评分之间存在显著相关性(平均能力的二年级学生中p = 0.007)。最后,为了部分控制与写作相关的认知能力,对OLSAT鉴定为非言语聚类OLSAT分数低于平均水平、平均水平或高于平均水平的儿童进行了额外分析。(非言语聚类由图形和图像推理组成。)该分析再次显示VMI与教师对写作成绩的评分之间存在显著相关性(平均水平的二年级学生中p = 0.001)。
视觉分析和视觉运动整合任务的表现与7岁、8岁和9岁儿童的学业成绩显著相关。