• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一项新颖的信号传递任务中进行观点采择:世界知识和语境约束的影响。

Perspective taking in a novel signaling task: Effects of world knowledge and contextual constraint.

机构信息

ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Department of Psychology.

Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Nov;147(11):1619-1640. doi: 10.1037/xge0000475.

DOI:10.1037/xge0000475
PMID:30372113
Abstract

Perspective taking-the ability to see things from someone else's point of view-can boost success in communication. A signaler might take perspective when designing an utterance that is informative from the receiver's point of view, or the receiver might take perspective when inferring the signaler's communicative intentions. Perspective taking is supposed to play a particularly vital role when people try to communicate in the absence of a conventional signaling system. However, the task demands in such cases are extremely different from those in typical experimental approaches to perspective taking. Thus, current evidence for perspective taking does not establish whether humans can take perspective in those cases where perspective taking is arguably most helpful. We describe experimental tests of perspective taking that are suitable for settling the matter. Our task focuses on the use of shared world knowledge rather than shared visual scenes, and it is suitable for both open-ended and contextually constrained responses. We show that people generally fail at perspective taking in a novel signaling task, but that perspective taking can be boosted by contextual constraint. In that case, however, it is context, rather than perspective taking or shared world knowledge, that explains communicative success. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

换位思考——从他人的角度看问题的能力——可以提高沟通的成功率。发信人在设计从收信人角度来看信息丰富的话语时可能会换位思考,或者收信人在推断发信人的交际意图时也可能会换位思考。当人们试图在没有传统信号系统的情况下进行交流时,换位思考应该发挥特别重要的作用。然而,这种情况下的任务要求与典型的换位思考实验方法有很大的不同。因此,目前关于换位思考的证据并不能确定人类是否可以在那些被认为最有帮助的情况下进行换位思考。我们描述了适合解决这一问题的换位思考实验测试。我们的任务侧重于使用共享的世界知识,而不是共享的视觉场景,并且它适用于开放式和上下文受限的响应。我们表明,人们在一个新的信号传递任务中普遍无法进行换位思考,但通过上下文限制可以提高换位思考的能力。然而,在这种情况下,解释交际成功的是上下文,而不是换位思考或共享的世界知识。

相似文献

1
Perspective taking in a novel signaling task: Effects of world knowledge and contextual constraint.在一项新颖的信号传递任务中进行观点采择:世界知识和语境约束的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Nov;147(11):1619-1640. doi: 10.1037/xge0000475.
2
Seeing it my way: a case of a selective deficit in inhibiting self-perspective.以我的方式看待它:一个抑制自我视角方面存在选择性缺陷的案例。
Brain. 2005 May;128(Pt 5):1102-11. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh464. Epub 2005 Mar 17.
3
My belief or yours? Differential theory of mind deficits in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease.我的信念还是你的信念?额颞叶痴呆和阿尔茨海默病的心智差异理论缺陷。
Brain. 2012 Oct;135(Pt 10):3026-38. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws237.
4
Stick or Switch: A Selection Heuristic Predicts when People Take the Perspective of Others or Communicate Egocentrically.坚持还是改变:一种选择启发式方法预测人们何时会站在他人角度思考或进行自我中心式交流。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 20;11(7):e0159570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159570. eCollection 2016.
5
Shared social groups or shared experiences? The effect of shared knowledge on children's perspective-taking.共同的社交群体还是共同的经历?共享知识对儿童观点采择的影响。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Oct;234:105707. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2023.105707. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
6
Depressive symptoms and use of perspective taking within a communicative context.抑郁症状与在交际情境中使用观点采择。
Cogn Emot. 2013;27(2):335-44. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.708648. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
7
Hierarchical Integration of Communicative and Spatial Perspective-Taking Demands in Sensorimotor Control of Referential Pointing.参照点指示的感知运动控制中交际和空间视角-taking 需求的分层整合。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Jan;46(1):e13084. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13084.
8
Perspective taking: motivation and impediment to shared reality.观点采择:共享现实的动机和障碍。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Oct;23:104-108. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
9
Perspective-taking in comprehension, production, and memory: An individual differences approach.理解、表达和记忆中的换位思考:一种个体差异研究方法。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Oct;144(5):898-915. doi: 10.1037/xge0000093. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
10
Words are not enough: how preschoolers' integration of perspective and emotion informs their referential understanding.言语不足以说明问题:学前儿童如何通过整合观点与情感来形成他们的指称理解。
J Child Lang. 2017 May;44(3):500-526. doi: 10.1017/S0305000916000519. Epub 2016 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Are you thinking what I'm thinking? Perspective-taking in a language game.你想的和我想的一样吗?语言游戏中的换位思考。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 5;19(1):e0288330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288330. eCollection 2024.
2
Amount of Learning and Signal Stability Modulate Emergence of Structure and Iconicity in Novel Signaling Systems.学习量和信号稳定性调节新信号系统中结构和象似性的出现。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Nov;45(11):e13057. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13057.
3
Limits to the Rational Production of Discourse Connectives.话语连接词合理生成的局限性。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 28;12:660730. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660730. eCollection 2021.
4
Cognitive mechanisms for inferring the meaning of novel signals during symbolisation.符号化过程中推断新信号含义的认知机制。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 16;13(1):e0189540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189540. eCollection 2018.