Logge Warren B, Haber Paul S, Hurzeler Tristan, Gallagher Hugh, Kranzler Henry, Morley Kirsten C
Edith Collins Centre for Translational Research in Alcohol, Drugs and Toxicology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Specialty of Addiction Medicine, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2025 Jan 24. doi: 10.1007/s00213-025-06745-7.
RATIONALE: Both topiramate and naltrexone have been shown to affect neural alcohol cue reactivity in alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, their comparative effects on alcohol cue reactivity are unknown. Moreover, while naltrexone has been found to normalize hyperactive localized network connectivity implicated in AUD, no studies have examined the effect of topiramate on intrinsic functional connectivity or compared functional connectivity between these two widely used medications. OBJECTIVE: This study compared topiramate versus naltrexone on alcohol cue-elicited brain activation and intrinsic functional connectivity in patients with alcohol use disorder. METHODS: Forty-seven participants with alcohol use disorder received daily topiramate (titrating the dose up to 200 mg/day n = 21) or naltrexone (50 mg/day, n = 26) for at least 6 weeks. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we examined intrinsic functional connectivity during rest and alcohol cue-elicited neural activation during a visual alcohol cue reactivity task 120 min following treatment administration. Functional connectivity and alcohol cue reactivity and percentage of heavy drinking days (% HDD) associations were assessed. RESULTS: No differences in either intrinsic functional connectivity or alcohol cue-elicited neural activity were seen between topiramate and naltrexone-treated groups. Overall, participants showed increased alcohol cue-elicited activation in three clusters spanning occipital regions involved in visual recognition of stimuli, and hypoactivation to both alcohol and control cues in three clusters involved in salience attribution and processing of emotional valence of external stimuli. No differences between topiramate versus naltrexone were observed for either functional measure or associations with post-scan % HDD. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate and naltrexone enacted comparable alcohol cue reactivity and intrinsic functional connectivity patterns. Some overall responses of increased brain activation to alcohol cues in visual processing regions coupled with reduced activation to alcohol and control cues were evidenced for both treatments. These activation patterns were in regions expected to show attenuation of brain activity resulting from treatment. Topiramate and naltrexone may thus enact functional effects through similar modulation of functional neural activity in individuals with AUD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03479086 https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/study/NCT03479086 .
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-1-13
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024-7-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-4-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-5-9
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-3-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9
Am J Psychiatry. 2022-12-1
Transl Psychiatry. 2022-1-28
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021-9
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021-7
Nat Protoc. 2020-6-8
Neuroimage. 2019-6-21