• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解美国的绝育后悔情绪:关系背景的作用。

Understanding Sterilization Regret in the United States: The Role of Relationship Context.

作者信息

Eeckhaut Mieke C W, Sweeney Megan M

机构信息

Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, University of Delaware, 309 Smith Hall, 18 Amstel Ave., Newark, DE 19716.

Department of Sociology & California Center for Population Research, University of California, Los Angeles, 202 Haines Hall, 375 Portola Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095.

出版信息

J Marriage Fam. 2018 Oct;80(5):1259-1270. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12500. Epub 2018 May 17.

DOI:10.1111/jomf.12500
PMID:30374205
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6203343/
Abstract

Although one fourth of sterilized reproductive-aged women in the U.S. express a desire to have their sterilization procedures reversed, the pathways leading to sterilization regret remain insufficiently understood. Particularly little is known about how cohabitation affects the likelihood of sterilization regret. This study used data from the 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth to investigate how relationship context shapes women's risk of sterilization regret. Our findings point to higher levels of regret among women who were cohabiting, rather than married or single at the time of sterilization. Experiencing post-sterilization union dissolution or post-sterilization union formation was also associated with an elevated risk of regret. Together, post-sterilization union instability and selected background characteristics largely explained elevated levels of regret observed among women who were cohabiting at the time of sterilization. An association between regret and post-sterilization union instability persisted, however, even when socioeconomic and reproductive background factors were controlled.

摘要

在美国,尽管四分之一接受绝育手术的育龄妇女表示希望恢复生育能力,但导致绝育后悔的原因仍未得到充分了解。尤其是对于同居如何影响绝育后悔的可能性知之甚少。本研究使用了2006 - 2010年全国家庭成长调查的数据,以探讨关系背景如何塑造女性绝育后悔的风险。我们的研究结果表明,绝育时处于同居状态而非已婚或单身的女性后悔程度更高。绝育后关系解体或绝育后建立新关系也与后悔风险增加有关。绝育后关系不稳定和特定的背景特征共同在很大程度上解释了绝育时处于同居状态的女性中观察到的较高后悔水平。然而,即使在控制了社会经济和生育背景因素之后,后悔与绝育后关系不稳定之间的关联仍然存在。

相似文献

1
Understanding Sterilization Regret in the United States: The Role of Relationship Context.了解美国的绝育后悔情绪:关系背景的作用。
J Marriage Fam. 2018 Oct;80(5):1259-1270. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12500. Epub 2018 May 17.
2
Sterilization regret among married women in India: implications for the Indian national family planning program.印度已婚女性的绝育后悔:对印度国家计划生育项目的影响。
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Dec;38(4):187-95. doi: 10.1363/3818712.
3
[Premature recourse to tubal ligation in Quebec: some undesirable consequences?].[魁北克过早进行输卵管结扎:是否存在一些不良后果?]
Sociol Soc. 1987 Apr;19(1):83-95.
4
Sterilization regret among U.S. couples.美国夫妇中的绝育后悔情况。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1986 Sep-Oct;18(5):238-40.
5
Sterilization regret in the Dominican Republic: looking for quality-of-care issues.多米尼加共和国的绝育后悔问题:探寻医疗服务质量问题
Stud Fam Plann. 1995 Jan-Feb;26(1):39-48.
6
Revisiting Post-Sterilization Regret in India.重新审视印度绝育后的遗憾。
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2020 Aug;70(4):295-303. doi: 10.1007/s13224-020-01309-5. Epub 2020 May 16.
7
Regret among 547 Danish sterilized women.547名丹麦绝育女性的遗憾。
Scand J Soc Med. 1988;16(1):41-8. doi: 10.1177/140349488801600107.
8
Sterilization incentives and associated regret among ever married women in India, NFHS, 2015-16.印度已婚女性的绝育激励措施及其相关遗憾,NFHS,2015-16 年。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 19;22(1):1063. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08401-8.
9
Regret, shame, and denials of women's voluntary sterilization.对女性自愿绝育的悔恨、羞耻与否认。
Bioethics. 2018 Jun;32(5):281-288. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12431. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
10
Sterilization acceptance and regret in Thailand.泰国的绝育接受情况与遗憾之情。
Contraception. 1991 Dec;44(6):623-37. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(91)90082-q.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation of opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention: Analyzing clinical practice and key characteristics.实施机会性输卵管切除术以预防卵巢癌:分析临床实践及关键特征。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Aug;104(8):1539-1549. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15128. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
2
Sterilization, Infecundity, and Reproductive Autonomy in Rural, Suburban, and Urban America: Results From a National Survey.美国农村、郊区和城市的绝育、生育力丧失与生殖自主权:一项全国性调查的结果
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Mar;57(1):72-84. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70006. Epub 2025 Mar 16.
3
Integrating Sexual and Reproductive Health Equity Into Public Health Goals and Metrics: Comparative Analysis of Healthy People 2030's Approach and a Person-Centered Approach to Contraceptive Access Using Population-Based Data.将性健康和生殖健康公平纳入公共卫生目标和指标:使用基于人群数据的《健康人 2030》方法与以人为主导的避孕获取方法的比较分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Aug 20;10:e58009. doi: 10.2196/58009.
4
Uncertainty in Postpartum Permanent Contraception Decision-Making: Physician and Patient Perspectives.产后永久性避孕决策中的不确定性:医生和患者的观点。
Womens Health Issues. 2024 Nov-Dec;34(6):572-579. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2024.06.005. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
5
Sterilization incentives and associated regret among ever married women in India, NFHS, 2015-16.印度已婚女性的绝育激励措施及其相关遗憾,NFHS,2015-16 年。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 19;22(1):1063. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08401-8.
6
Migration and Contraception among Mexican Women: Assessing Selection, Disruption, and Adaptation.墨西哥女性的迁移与避孕:评估选择、干扰和适应情况
Popul Res Policy Rev. 2022 Apr;41(2):495-520. doi: 10.1007/s11113-021-09661-8. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
7
FSFI score and timing of tubal ligation in patients: preliminary results of an online survey.患者的 FSFI 评分与输卵管结扎时间:一项在线调查的初步结果。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Sep;306(3):795-800. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06547-8. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
8
Changing Educational Differentials in Female Sterilization.女性绝育教育差异的变化。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Jul;52(2):117-127. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12137. Epub 2020 May 28.
9
Desire for Sterilization Reversal Among U.S. Females: Increasing Inequalities by Educational Level.美国女性对绝育手术逆转的渴望:受教育程度不平等加剧。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Sep;50(3):139-145. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12076. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Marital status and female and male contraceptive sterilization in the United States.美国的婚姻状况以及男性和女性绝育手术
Fertil Steril. 2015 Jun;103(6):1509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.036. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
2
Surgical sterilization, regret, and race: contemporary patterns.手术绝育、后悔情绪与种族:当代模式
Soc Sci Res. 2015 Mar;50:31-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
3
Current contraceptive status among women aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013.2011 - 2013年美国15 - 44岁女性的当前避孕状况
NCHS Data Brief. 2014 Dec(173):1-8.
4
Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.先有女性还是先有长效可逆避孕法?生殖自主权与长效可逆避孕方法的推广。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Sep;46(3):171-5. doi: 10.1363/46e1614. Epub 2014 May 23.
5
Celebration meets caution: LARC's boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach.庆祝与谨慎并存:长效可逆避孕法的益处、潜在风险以及生殖正义方法的优势
Contraception. 2014 Apr;89(4):237-41. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.027. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
6
The Role of Cohabitation in Family Formation: The United States in Comparative Perspective.同居在家庭形成中的作用:比较视角下的美国
J Marriage Fam. 2004 Dec 1;66(5):1214-1230. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00088.x.
7
The compositional and institutional sources of union dissolution for married and unmarried parents in the United States.美国已婚和未婚父母离婚的构成和制度根源。
Demography. 2013 Oct;50(5):1789-818. doi: 10.1007/s13524-013-0203-7.
8
Does a history of unintended pregnancy lessen the likelihood of desire for sterilization reversal?有意外怀孕史是否会降低对输精管复通术的渴望?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013 Jun;22(6):501-6. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.3885. Epub 2013 Apr 27.
9
Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research: La fécondité dans les sociétés avancées: un examen des recherches.发达社会中的生育能力:研究综述:发达社会中的生育力:研究考察。
Eur J Popul. 2013 Feb;29(1):1-38. doi: 10.1007/s10680-012-9277-y. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
10
Fertility of men and women aged 15-44 years in the United States: National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2010.美国15 - 44岁男性和女性的生育能力:2006 - 2010年全国家庭成长调查
Natl Health Stat Report. 2012 Apr 12(51):1-28.