Banerjee Abhijit, Duflo Esther, Hornbeck Richard
MIT.
University of Chicago.
Economica. 2018 Oct;85(340):671-700. doi: 10.1111/ecca.12271. Epub 2018 May 25.
Randomized controlled trials have found only modest effects of microfinance, but these studies focus on new clients. Existing estimates may thus understate ongoing gains for more experienced borrowers and the longer-run potential of microfinance. We estimate impacts of microfinance on borrowers, using an episode when a microfinance institution modestly increased existing clients' fees in randomly selected villages (in exchange for a mandatory health insurance policy that turned out to be useless). This increase in fees led to a 22 percentage point decline in loan renewal in treatment villages (95% confidence interval: 16 to 27), compared to control villages where the policy was not introduced. Using this randomly generated variation in microfinance participation among borrowers, we find impacts of microfinance that are strikingly similar to previous estimates for new clients: neither business outcomes nor household consumption were affected, on average. Also, consistent with prior studies, we find significant impacts on business outcomes among clients who had started their businesses before microfinance entered the village (0.06 standard deviation decline in an index of business outcomes from the loss of microfinance, 95% confidence interval: -0.002 to -0.12). However, despite these measured losses, these clients were just as willing to give up microfinance.
随机对照试验发现小额信贷的效果并不显著,但这些研究关注的是新客户。因此,现有估计可能低估了经验更丰富的借款人持续获得的收益以及小额信贷的长期潜力。我们利用一家小额信贷机构在随机选择的村庄适度提高现有客户费用的事件(作为交换,提供了一份后来证明毫无用处的强制健康保险政策),来估计小额信贷对借款人的影响。与未推行该政策的对照村庄相比,费用的增加导致处理村庄的贷款续期下降了22个百分点(95%置信区间:16至27)。利用借款人中小额信贷参与度的这种随机产生的变化,我们发现小额信贷的影响与之前对新客户的估计惊人地相似:平均而言,商业成果和家庭消费均未受到影响。此外,与先前的研究一致,我们发现对于在小额信贷进入村庄之前就已创业的客户,小额信贷对商业成果有显著影响(因失去小额信贷,商业成果指数下降0.06个标准差,95%置信区间:-0.002至-0.12)。然而,尽管有这些已测量到的损失,这些客户放弃小额信贷的意愿依然相同。