• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种系统评价和荟萃分析比较非甾体抗炎药、阿片类药物和对乙酰氨基酚治疗急性肾绞痛的疗效。

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, Opioids, and Paracetamol in the Treatment of Acute Renal Colic.

机构信息

Emergency Department, Hamad General Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; National Trauma Research Institute, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

Department of Epidemiology & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; National Trauma Research Institute, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; Emergency & Trauma Centre, The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):583-595. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.001
PMID:29174580
Abstract

CONTEXT

Renal colic is a common, acute presentation of urolithiasis that requires immediate pain relief. European Association of Urology guidelines recommend nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as the preferred analgesia. However, the fear of NSAID adverse effects and the uncertainty about superior analgesic effect have maintained the practice of advocating intravenous opioids as the initial analgesia.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the safety and efficacy of NSAIDs with opioids and paracetamol (acetaminophen) for the management of acute renal colic.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Google Scholar, and the reference list of retrieved articles were searched up to December 2016 without language restrictions. Two reviewers independently assessed eligible studies using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing and reporting the risk of bias and abstracted data using predefined data fields.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

From 468 potentially relevant studies, 36 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 4887 patients, published between 1982 and 2016, were included in this systematic review. The treatment effect observed indicated marginal benefit of NSAIDs over opioids in initial pain reduction at 30min (11 RCTs, n=1985, mean difference [MD] -5.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] -10.22 to -0.95; heterogeneity I=81%). In the subgroup analyses by the route of administration, NSAIDs required fewer rescue treatments (seven RCTs, n=541, number needed to treat [NNT] 11, 95% CI 6-75) and had lower vomiting rates compared with opioids (five RCTs, n=531, NNT 5, 95% CI 4-8). Comparisons of NSAIDs with paracetamol showed no difference for both drugs at 30min (four RCTs, n=1325, MD -5.67, 95% CI -17.52 to 6.18, p=0.35; I=89%). Patients treated with NSAIDs required fewer rescue treatments (two trials, n=1145, risk ratio 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.74, p<0.001; I=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

NSAIDs were equivalent to opioids or paracetamol in the relief of acute renal colic pain at 30min. There was less vomiting and fewer requirements for rescue analgesia with NSAIDs compared with opioids. Patients treated with NSAIDs required less rescue analgesia compared with paracetamol. Despite observed heterogeneity among the included studies and the overall quality of evidence, the findings of a lower need for rescue analgesia and fewer adverse events, in conjunction with the practical advantages of ease of delivery, suggest that NSAIDs should be the preferred analgesic option for patients presenting to the emergency department with renal colic.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In kidney stone-related acute pain episodes in patients with adequate renal function, treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs offers effective and most sustained pain relief, with fewer side effects, when compared with opioids or paracetamol.

摘要

背景

肾绞痛是一种常见的急性尿路结石表现,需要立即缓解疼痛。欧洲泌尿外科学会指南推荐非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)作为首选的镇痛剂。然而,人们对 NSAID 不良反应的担忧以及对镇痛效果更好的不确定,使得静脉注射阿片类药物作为初始镇痛的做法得以维持。

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在比较 NSAIDs 与阿片类药物和对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)在治疗急性肾绞痛方面的安全性和疗效。

证据获取

Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、MEDLINE、EMBASE、世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台、Google Scholar 以及检索文章的参考文献列表均进行了检索,检索时间截至 2016 年 12 月,无语言限制。两名评审员使用 Cochrane 协作工具评估合格研究的偏倚风险,并使用预定义的数据字段提取数据。

证据综合

从 468 项可能相关的研究中,纳入了 36 项随机对照试验(RCTs),共 4887 名患者,这些研究发表于 1982 年至 2016 年之间。治疗效果观察表明,NSAIDs 在 30 分钟时初始疼痛缓解方面略优于阿片类药物(11 项 RCTs,n=1985,平均差异[MD]-5.58,95%置信区间[CI]-10.22 至-0.95;异质性 I=81%)。通过给药途径的亚组分析,与阿片类药物相比,NSAIDs 需要较少的解救治疗(7 项 RCTs,n=541,需要治疗的人数[NNT]11,95%CI 6-75),且呕吐率较低(5 项 RCTs,n=531,NNT 5,95%CI 4-8)。NSAIDs 与对乙酰氨基酚的比较显示,在 30 分钟时两种药物均无差异(4 项 RCTs,n=1325,MD-5.67,95%CI-17.52 至 6.18,p=0.35;I=89%)。与阿片类药物相比,接受 NSAIDs 治疗的患者需要较少的解救治疗(2 项试验,n=1145,风险比 0.56,95%CI 0.42-0.74,p<0.001;I=0%)。

结论

在缓解肾绞痛疼痛方面,NSAIDs 在 30 分钟时与阿片类药物或对乙酰氨基酚等效。与阿片类药物相比,NSAIDs 可减少呕吐和对解救性镇痛的需求。与对乙酰氨基酚相比,接受 NSAIDs 治疗的患者对解救性镇痛的需求更少。尽管纳入的研究存在异质性,证据总体质量也较低,但观察到需要较少的解救性镇痛和较少的不良反应,再加上给药的实际优势,提示在出现肾绞痛的患者中,NSAIDs 应作为首选的镇痛药物。

患者总结

在肾功能正常的肾结石相关急性疼痛发作患者中,与阿片类药物或对乙酰氨基酚相比,非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)提供了更有效的、最持久的疼痛缓解,且副作用更少。

相似文献

1
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Comparing the Efficacy of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs, Opioids, and Paracetamol in the Treatment of Acute Renal Colic.一种系统评价和荟萃分析比较非甾体抗炎药、阿片类药物和对乙酰氨基酚治疗急性肾绞痛的疗效。
Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):583-595. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
2
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and non-opioids for acute renal colic.非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和非阿片类药物用于急性肾绞痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 29;2015(6):CD006027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006027.pub2.
3
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus opioids for acute renal colic.非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)与阿片类药物治疗急性肾绞痛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD004137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004137.pub2.
4
What is the best analgesic option for patients presenting with renal colic to the emergency department? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.对于急诊科收治的肾绞痛患者,最佳镇痛选择是什么?一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 May 4;7(4):e015002. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015002.
5
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus opioids for acute renal colic.非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)与阿片类药物治疗急性肾绞痛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2004(2):CD004137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004137.pub3.
6
Oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs versus other oral analgesic agents for acute soft tissue injury.口服非甾体抗炎药与其他口服镇痛药治疗急性软组织损伤的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1(7):CD007789. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007789.pub2.
7
Comparison of intravenous paracetamol (acetaminophen) to intravenously or intramuscularly administered non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or opioids for patients presenting with moderate to severe acute pain conditions to the ED: systematic review and meta-analysis.静脉用对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)与静脉或肌内给予非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)或阿片类药物治疗急诊科中度至重度急性疼痛患者的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Emerg Med J. 2023 Jul;40(7):499-508. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212869. Epub 2023 May 12.
8
9
Increasing Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Reducing Opioids or Paracetamol in the Management of Acute Renal Colic: Based on Three-Stage Study Design of Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.在急性肾绞痛管理中增加非甾体抗炎药并减少阿片类药物或对乙酰氨基酚:基于随机对照试验网络荟萃分析的三阶段研究设计
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Feb 22;10:96. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00096. eCollection 2019.
10
Delivering safe and effective analgesia for management of renal colic in the emergency department: a double-blind, multigroup, randomised controlled trial.在急诊科管理肾绞痛时提供安全有效的镇痛:一项双盲、多组、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):1999-2007. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00652-8. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Sterile water injections for analgesia in renal colic: a meta-analysis of level 1 evidence.无菌水注射用于肾绞痛镇痛:一级证据的荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2025 Sep 16;43(1):557. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05920-x.
2
Kidney stone disease: risk factors, pathophysiology and management.肾结石疾病:危险因素、病理生理学及管理
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1038/s41581-025-00990-x.
3
Questionable role of opioids for analgesia in renal colic and its urological interventions.阿片类药物在肾绞痛及其泌尿外科干预中镇痛的可疑作用。
BJUI Compass. 2025 Jun 11;6(6):e70038. doi: 10.1002/bco2.70038. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Analysis Reveals the Role of Macrophage-Mediated CD44-AKT-CCL2 Pathways in Renal Tubule Injury during Calcium Oxalate Crystal Formation.单细胞RNA测序分析揭示巨噬细胞介导的CD44-AKT-CCL2通路在草酸钙结晶形成过程中肾小管损伤中的作用。
Research (Wash D C). 2025 May 6;8:0690. doi: 10.34133/research.0690. eCollection 2025.
5
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for acute renal colic.用于急性肾绞痛的非甾体抗炎药
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 14;3(3):CD006027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006027.pub3.
6
Brazilian Guidelines on evaluation and clinical management of Nephrolithiasis: Brazilian Society of Nephrology.巴西肾结石评估与临床管理指南:巴西肾脏病学会
J Bras Nefrol. 2025 Apr-Jun;47(2):e20240189. doi: 10.1590/2175-8239-JBN-2024-0189en.
7
Early acupuncture intervention for pain relief in emergency department patients with suspected acute renal colic caused by urinary calculi: a randomized clinical trial.早期针刺干预对急诊科疑似尿路结石所致急性肾绞痛患者的止痛效果:一项随机临床试验
QJM. 2025 May 1;118(5):329-336. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcaf011.
8
Superior efficacy of intramuscular diclofenac compared to intravenous tramadol for acute renal colic in northern Thai patients: A randomised double-blind, sham-controlled trial.在泰国北部患者中,肌肉注射双氯芬酸治疗急性肾绞痛的疗效优于静脉注射曲马多:一项随机双盲、假对照试验。
Emerg Med Australas. 2025 Feb;37(1):e14550. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14550.
9
Enhancing analgesia in acute renal colic pain: a randomized controlled trial of gabapentin adjunct to ketorolac-based regimen.增强急性肾绞痛的镇痛效果:加巴喷丁辅助基于酮咯酸的治疗方案的随机对照试验
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 14;5:1427711. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1427711. eCollection 2024.
10
A novel opioid/pramipexole combination treatment for the management of acute pain: a pilot study.一种用于急性疼痛管理的新型阿片类药物/普拉克索联合治疗:一项试点研究。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Sep 24;5:1422298. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1422298. eCollection 2024.