• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死后长期时变再入院风险。

Long-Term Time-Varying Risk of Readmission After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

1 Department of Cardiology Heart and Vascular Institute Center for Healthcare Delivery Innovation Cleveland OH.

2 Department of Quantitative Health Sciences Research Institute Cleveland OH.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Nov 6;7(21):e009650. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009650.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.118.009650
PMID:30375246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6404216/
Abstract

Background Readmission after myocardial infarction ( MI ) is a publicly reported quality metric with hospital reimbursement linked to readmission rates. We describe the timing and pattern of readmission by cause within the first year after MI in consecutive patients, regardless of revascularization strategy, payer status, or age. Methods and Results We identified patients discharged after an MI from April 2008 to June 2012. Readmission within 12 months was the primary end point. Readmissions were classified into 4 groups: MI related, other cardiovascular, noncardiovascular, and planned. A total of 3069 patients were discharged after an MI (average age, 65±13 years; and 1941 [63%] men). A total of 655 patients (21.3%) were readmitted at least once (897 total readmissions). A total of 147 patients (4.8%) were readmitted ≥2 times, accounting for 389 readmissions (43%). The instantaneous risk of all-cause readmission was highest (15 readmissions/100 patients per month; 95% confidence interval, 12-19 readmissions/100 patients per month) immediately after discharge, decreased by almost half (8.1 readmissions/100 patients per month; 95% confidence interval, 7.2-9.0 readmissions/100 patients per month) within 15 days, and was substantially lower and relatively constant (1.4 readmissions/100 patients per month; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.6 readmissions/100 patients per month) out to 1 year. Cardiovascular causes of readmission were more common early after discharge. Conclusions Most patients with MI are never readmitted, whereas a small minority (≈5%) account for nearly half of 1-year readmissions. The readmission pattern after MI is characterized by an early peak (first 15 days) of cardiovascular readmissions, followed by a middle period (months 1-4) of noncardiovascular readmissions, and ending with a low-risk period (>4 months) during which the risk appears independent of cause.

摘要

背景 心肌梗死后(MI)再入院是一个公开报告的质量指标,与再入院率相关的医院报销。我们描述了在 MI 后 1 年内,无论血管重建策略、支付者状态或年龄如何,因病因导致的再入院的时间和模式。

方法和结果 我们从 2008 年 4 月至 2012 年 6 月期间确定了 MI 出院后的患者。12 个月内再入院是主要终点。将再入院分为 4 组:MI 相关、其他心血管、非心血管和计划。共有 3069 例 MI 患者出院(平均年龄 65±13 岁;1941 例[63%]为男性)。共有 655 例患者(21.3%)至少一次再入院(共 897 次再入院)。共有 147 例患者(4.8%)再入院≥2 次,占 389 次再入院(43%)。所有原因再入院的瞬时风险最高(15 例/100 例患者/月;95%置信区间,12-19 例/100 例患者/月),出院后立即下降近一半(8.1 例/100 例患者/月;95%置信区间,7.2-9.0 例/100 例患者/月),在 15 天内显著降低且相对稳定(1.4 例/100 例患者/月;95%置信区间,1.2-1.6 例/100 例患者/月),直至 1 年。心血管原因导致的再入院在出院后早期更为常见。

结论 大多数 MI 患者从未再入院,而少数(约 5%)患者占 1 年再入院人数的近一半。MI 后的再入院模式的特点是早期(第 15 天内)心血管再入院高峰,随后是中期(1-4 个月)非心血管再入院,最后是低风险期(>4 个月),在此期间,风险似乎与病因无关。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Time-Varying Risk of Readmission After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后长期时变再入院风险。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Nov 6;7(21):e009650. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009650.
2
Diagnoses and timing of 30-day readmissions after hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia.心力衰竭、急性心肌梗死或肺炎患者住院后 30 天内再入院的诊断和时间。
JAMA. 2013 Jan 23;309(4):355-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.216476.
3
Association of US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital 30-Day Risk-Standardized Readmission Metric With Care Quality and Outcomes After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Findings From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry/Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With the Guidelines.美国医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心医院 30 天风险标准化再入院指标与急性心肌梗死治疗后护理质量和结局的关联:来自国家心血管数据注册/急性冠状动脉治疗和干预结局网络注册-遵循指南的研究结果。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Jul 1;2(7):723-731. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1143.
4
Association of early physician follow-up and 30-day readmission after non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction among older patients.老年非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的早期医生随访与 30 天再入院的关系。
Circulation. 2013 Sep 10;128(11):1206-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004569. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
5
Unplanned Readmissions After Acute Myocardial Infarction: 1-Year Trajectory Following Discharge From a Safety Net Hospital.
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2019 Jun;18(2):72-74. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000170.
6
Thirty-Day Hospital Readmission After Acute Myocardial Infarction in China.中国急性心肌梗死后30天再入院情况
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 May;12(5):e005628. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.005628.
7
Readmissions After Acute Myocardial Infarction: How Often Do Patients Return to the Discharging Hospital?急性心肌梗死患者的再入院情况:有多少患者返回出院医院?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct;8(19):e012059. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012059. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
8
Sex-specific risk of emergency department revisits and early readmission following myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后急诊科复诊和早期再入院的性别特异性风险。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Sep 15;243:54-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.076. Epub 2017 May 19.
9
Clinical Model to Predict 90-Day Risk of Readmission After Acute Myocardial Infarction.预测急性心肌梗死后90天再入院风险的临床模型。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Oct;11(10):e004788. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004788.
10
Long-Term Post-Discharge Risks in Older Survivors of Myocardial Infarction With and Without Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.老年心肌梗死幸存者出院后的长期风险,无论是否伴有院外心脏骤停。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 May 3;67(17):1981-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.044.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychopathological symptoms, personality, and epistemic stances in individuals with myocardial infarction: an empirical investigation.心肌梗死患者的精神病理症状、人格和认知立场:一项实证研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 22;16:1587747. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1587747. eCollection 2025.
2
Current and Future Cost Burden of Myocardial Infarction in Australia: Dynamic Multistate Markov Model.澳大利亚心肌梗死当前及未来的成本负担:动态多状态马尔可夫模型
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09423-8.
3
Incidence and predictors of recurrent acute coronary syndrome among adult patients with acute coronary syndrome in West Amhara, Ethiopia: a multicenter retrospective follow-up study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Time-Varying Risk of Cardiovascular and Noncardiovascular Readmissions Early After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后早期心血管和非心血管再入院的时变风险
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 22;70(8):1101-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.043.
2
Race and Sex Differences in Post-Myocardial Infarction Angina Frequency and Risk of 1-Year Unplanned Rehospitalization.种族和性别对心肌梗死后心绞痛频率和 1 年非计划性再住院风险的影响。
Circulation. 2017 Feb 7;135(6):532-543. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024406.
3
Relationship between Early Physician Follow-Up and 30-Day Readmission after Acute Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure.
埃塞俄比亚阿姆哈拉西部地区成年急性冠状动脉综合征患者复发性急性冠状动脉综合征的发病率及预测因素:一项多中心回顾性随访研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Oct 16;10:1234239. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1234239. eCollection 2023.
4
Evaluation of a Structuralized Sick-Leave Programme Compared with usual Care Sick-Leave Management for Patients after an Acute Myocardial Infarction.评价结构化病假方案与急性心肌梗死后患者常规病假管理的比较。
J Rehabil Med. 2023 Jul 24;55:jrm4569. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.4569.
5
Long-Term Hospital Readmission after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A 3-Year Follow-up from the SEMI-CI Study.ST段抬高型心肌梗死后的长期医院再入院:来自SEMI-CI研究的3年随访
J Tehran Heart Cent. 2022 Oct;17(4):230-235. doi: 10.18502/jthc.v17i4.11612.
6
Background and design of a 5-year ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Cohort in Isfahan, Iran: SEMI-CI study.伊朗伊斯法罕一项为期5年的ST段抬高型心肌梗死队列研究的背景与设计:SEMI-CI研究
ARYA Atheroscler. 2021 May;17(3):1-7. doi: 10.22122/arya.v17i0.2375.
7
Health literacy and long-term health outcomes following myocardial infarction: protocol for a multicentre, prospective cohort study (ENHEARTEN study).健康素养与心肌梗死后长期健康结局的相关性:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究方案(ENHEARTEN 研究)
BMJ Open. 2022 May 6;12(5):e060480. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060480.
8
Readmission After ACS: Burden, Epidemiology, and Mitigation.急性冠脉综合征(ACS)后再入院:负担、流行病学和缓解策略。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Jul;24(7):807-815. doi: 10.1007/s11886-022-01702-8. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
9
Myocardial Infarction Complications After Surgery in Vietnam: Estimates of Incremental Cost, Readmission Risk, and Length of Hospital Stay.越南手术后心肌梗死并发症:增量成本、再入院风险和住院时间的估计。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 10;9:799529. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.799529. eCollection 2021.
10
Characteristics and Outcomes of Early Recurrent Myocardial Infarction After Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死后早期再发心肌梗死的特征和结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 17;10(16):e019270. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019270. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
急性心肌梗死和心力衰竭后早期医生随访与30天再入院之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170061. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170061. eCollection 2017.
4
Trajectories of Risk for Specific Readmission Diagnoses after Hospitalization for Heart Failure, Acute Myocardial Infarction, or Pneumonia.心力衰竭、急性心肌梗死或肺炎住院后特定再入院诊断的风险轨迹。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 7;11(10):e0160492. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160492. eCollection 2016.
5
Has Public Reporting of Hospital Readmission Rates Affected Patient Outcomes?: Analysis of Medicare Claims Data.医院再入院率的公开报告是否影响了患者的预后?——基于医疗保险索赔数据的分析。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;67(8):963-972. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.037.
6
Differences between early and late readmissions among patients: a cohort study.患者早期与晚期再入院之间的差异:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):741-9. doi: 10.7326/M14-2159.
7
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association.《2015年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2015 Jan 27;131(4):e29-322. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000152. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
8
Readmissions after hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, or pneumonia among young and middle-aged adults: a retrospective observational cohort study.年轻及中年成年人因心力衰竭、急性心肌梗死或肺炎住院后的再入院情况:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2014 Sep 30;11(9):e1001737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001737. eCollection 2014 Sep.
9
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
10
Association of early physician follow-up and 30-day readmission after non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction among older patients.老年非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的早期医生随访与 30 天再入院的关系。
Circulation. 2013 Sep 10;128(11):1206-13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004569. Epub 2013 Aug 14.