1 Gruss Magnetic Resonance Imaging Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
2 Samuel Gottesman Library, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Apr 15;36(8):1222-1230. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5838. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
Diffusion tensor imaging is a magnetic resonance imaging technique that is uniquely capable of detecting microstructural tissue damage in mild and moderate traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). To date, it remains unknown if two common analytic techniques, region of interest (ROI) versus voxel-wise (VW) analyses, detect injury in similar locations. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to directly compare the regions of abnormality elucidated by each method. Twenty-seven ROI and 11 VW studies met our inclusion criteria. Our ROI meta-analysis identified 11 regions, including the splenium of the corpus callosum, where fractional anisotropy (FA) was significantly decreased in TBI patients, compared with controls. Likewise, we identified higher mean diffusivity/apparent diffusivity constant in the genu, body, and splenium of the corpus callosum. Alternatively, our VW analysis identified one region of high FA in the right superior longitudinal fasciculus and seven regions of low FA, with the two largest located in the corpus callosum. High mean diffusivity and high radial diffusivity, both in the right inferior longitudinal fasciculus, also was revealed by our VW analysis. Moreover, we have shown that the magnitude of damage in the corpus callosum revealed by ROI analysis (z = -3.15) is greater than that demonstrated by VW analysis (z = -1.41). Overall, this study indicates that both ROI and VW analytic methods are sensitive to low FA in the corpus callosum; however, the ROI method has more power to detect the full extent of tissue abnormality in the corpus callosum. More research utilizing standardized methods and reporting is essential to fully characterize the extent to which ROI and VW analyses can concordantly detect other locations of pathology in mild and moderate TBI patients.
弥散张量成像(DTI)是一种磁共振成像技术,能够独特地检测轻度和中度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)中的微观结构组织损伤。迄今为止,尚不清楚两种常见的分析技术,即感兴趣区(ROI)与体素分析(VW),是否能在相似的部位检测到损伤。本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是直接比较每种方法所揭示的异常区域。27 项 ROI 研究和 11 项 VW 研究符合我们的纳入标准。我们的 ROI 荟萃分析确定了 11 个区域,包括胼胝体体部,在 TBI 患者中,与对照组相比,FA 显著降低。同样,我们还确定了胼胝体膝部、体部和干部的平均弥散系数/表观弥散系数常数较高。相反,我们的 VW 分析确定了右侧上纵束一个高 FA 区域和七个低 FA 区域,其中两个最大的区域位于胼胝体。VW 分析还揭示了右侧下纵束的高平均弥散系数和高辐射弥散系数。此外,我们已经表明,ROI 分析(z=-3.15)揭示的胼胝体损伤程度大于 VW 分析(z=-1.41)。总的来说,这项研究表明,ROI 和 VW 分析方法都对胼胝体的低 FA 敏感;然而,ROI 方法更有能力检测胼胝体组织异常的全部范围。需要更多利用标准化方法和报告的研究,以充分描述 ROI 和 VW 分析在轻度和中度 TBI 患者中检测其他部位病理的一致性程度。