• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威产时胎儿监测常规的全国性调查。

National survey of routines for intrapartum fetal monitoring in Norway.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Mar;98(3):390-395. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13500. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

DOI:10.1111/aogs.13500
PMID:30375643
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study describes clinical routines for intrapartum fetal monitoring in Norway and compliance with national clinical recommendations.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A national survey of all (n = 48) birth units in Norway, using a self-reporting questionnaire about fetal monitoring methods and devices available in the birth units, admission cardiotocography (CTG) use, intrapartum fetal monitoring methods for women with and without risk factors, the availability of fetal scalp blood sampling facilities, and umbilical cord blood sampling routines.

RESULTS

All birth units responded. They all had access to Pinard stethoscopes, hand-held Doppler devices, and CTG. Half of the units used ST waveform analysis (STAN) as an adjunct to CTG. Furthermore, 23 of 48 units analyzed fetal blood samples and 43 of 48 umbilical cord blood gas samples. In 11 units, admission CTG was routinely offered to all women. No units used continuous CTG during labor in low-risk women. However, three units routinely used intermittent CTG during the first stage of labor. Three units used CTG without having access to fetal blood samples or STAN.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate some deviations from clinical recommendations in the use of intrapartum fetal monitoring in Norway. Three units used intermittent CTG for women without risk factors. Almost one in four units routinely used admission CTG, despite national clinical recommendations. The lack of access to fetal blood samples or STAN in units using CTG is of concern.

摘要

简介

本研究描述了挪威产时胎儿监测的临床常规及对国家临床建议的遵循情况。

材料与方法

对挪威所有(n=48)分娩单位进行了一项全国性调查,使用自我报告问卷了解分娩单位中可用的胎儿监测方法和设备、入院胎心监护(CTG)使用情况、有或无危险因素的产妇产时胎儿监测方法、胎儿头皮采血设施的可用性以及脐带血采样常规。

结果

所有分娩单位均做出回应。它们均能使用 Pinard 听诊器、手持式多普勒设备和 CTG。半数单位将 ST 波分析(STAN)作为 CTG 的辅助手段。此外,48 个单位中有 23 个分析了胎儿血样,48 个中有 43 个分析了脐带血血气样本。在 11 个单位中,所有妇女常规入院时行 CTG。无单位在低危产妇中常规行产时连续 CTG。然而,有 3 个单位在第一产程中常规间歇性使用 CTG。有 3 个单位使用 CTG,但无法获得胎儿血样或 STAN。

结论

我们的发现表明,挪威在产时胎儿监测的使用方面存在一些与临床建议的偏差。有 3 个单位对无危险因素的妇女使用间歇性 CTG。近四分之一的单位常规入院时行 CTG,尽管有国家临床建议。在使用 CTG 的单位中无法获得胎儿血样或 STAN 令人担忧。

相似文献

1
National survey of routines for intrapartum fetal monitoring in Norway.挪威产时胎儿监测常规的全国性调查。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Mar;98(3):390-395. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13500. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
2
Cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of fetal heart on admission to labour ward for assessment of fetal wellbeing.在产妇入院待产时,用胎心监护仪与间断听诊评估胎儿健康状况的对比研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD005122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005122.pub4.
3
The use of intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: a national survey.产时电子胎心监护的使用情况:一项全国性调查。
Ir Med J. 2007 Feb;100(2):360-2.
4
Recommendations for intrapartum fetal monitoring are not followed in low-risk women: A study from two Norwegian birth units.低危产妇的产时胎儿监护推荐并未得到遵循:来自挪威两个分娩单位的研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2020 Dec;26:100552. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100552. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
5
STAN S21 fetal heart monitor for fetal surveillance during labor: an observational study in 637 patients.STAN S21型胎儿心脏监护仪用于分娩期间的胎儿监测:一项对637例患者的观察性研究
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004 Jun;15(6):400-7. doi: 10.1080/14767050410001727404.
6
A randomised clinical trial on cardiotocography plus fetal blood sampling versus cardiotocography plus ST-analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram (STAN) for intrapartum monitoring.一项关于产时监护中胎心监护联合胎儿血样采集与胎心监护联合胎儿心电图ST段分析(STAN)的随机临床试验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2007 Jul 26;7:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-13.
7
Randomised trial of cardiotocography alone or with ST waveform analysis for intrapartum monitoring.单独使用胎心监护或联合ST段波形分析进行产时监测的随机试验。
Lancet. 1992 Jul 25;340(8813):194-8. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)90465-f.
8
ST waveform analysis vs cardiotocography alone for intrapartum fetal monitoring: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.ST 段波形分析与单独胎心监护用于产时胎儿监测的比较:一项更新的随机试验系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Mar;103(3):437-448. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14752. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
9
New FIGO and Swedish intrapartum cardiotocography classification systems incorporated in the fetal ECG ST analysis (STAN) interpretation algorithm: agreements and discrepancies in cardiotocography classification and evaluation of significant ST events.新版 FIGO 和瑞典产时胎儿心电图 ST 分析(STAN)解读算法中的胎儿心电图监护分类系统:分类和评估有意义的 ST 事件的胎儿心电图监护中的一致性和差异。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Feb;97(2):219-228. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13277.
10
Cardiotocography combined with ST analysis versus cardiotocography combined with fetal blood sampling in deliveries with abnormal CTG: a randomized trial.在产时胎心监护异常的分娩中,胎心监护联合ST段分析与胎心监护联合胎儿血样采集的比较:一项随机试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Jun;307(6):1771-1780. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06649-3. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Intermittent auscultation fetal monitoring practice in different UK birth settings: a cross-sectional survey.英国不同分娩环境下的间歇性听诊胎儿监测实践:一项横断面调查。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 14;25(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07514-2.
2
Experience of Labour and Childbirth in a Sample of Portuguese Women: A Cross-Sectional Study.葡萄牙女性样本的分娩经历:一项横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Oct 24;12(21):2125. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212125.
3
Umbilical cord blood gases sampling in low-risk vaginal deliveries as a predictor of adverse neonatal outcome.
脐带血血气采样在低危阴道分娩中作为预测不良新生儿结局的指标。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Feb;309(2):523-531. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-06965-2. Epub 2023 Feb 19.