Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Sep;21(9):e25185. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25185.
The latent reservoir is the main barrier on the road to HIV cure, and clinical approaches towards eradication are often evaluated by their effect on proviral DNA. To ensure inclusiveness and representativeness in HIV cure studies, proviral DNA quantification assays that are able to detect all common circulating HIV clades are urgently needed. Here, three HIV DNA assays targeting three different genomic regions were evaluated for their sensitivity and subtype-tolerance using digital PCR.
A subtype-B-specific assay targeting gag (GAG) and two assays targeting conserved sequences in ltr and pol (LTR and JO) were assessed for their sensitivity and subtype-tolerance in digital PCR (Bio-Rad QX200), using a panel of serially diluted subtype reference plasmids as well as a panel of clinical isolates. Both panels represent subtypes A, B, C, D, F, G and circulating recombinant forms (CRFs) AE and AG, which together are responsible for 94% of HIV infections worldwide.
HIV subtype was observed to greatly affect HIV DNA quantification results. Robust regression analysis of the serially diluted plasmid panel showed that the GAG assay was only able to linearly quantify subtype B, D and G isolates (4/13 reference plasmids, average R = 0.99), whereas LTR and JO were able to quantify all tested isolates (13/13 reference plasmids, respective average R = 0.99 and 0.98). In the clinical isolates panel, isolates were considered detectable if all replicates produced a positive result. The GAG assay could detect HIV DNA in four out of five subtype B and one out of two subtype D isolates, whereas the LTR and JO assays detected HIV DNA in all twenty-nine tested isolates. LTR and JO results were found to be equally precise but more precise than GAG.
The results demonstrate the need for a careful validation of proviral reservoir quantification assays prior to investigations into non-B subtype reservoirs. The LTR and JO assays can sensitively and reliably quantify HIV DNA in a panel that represents the worldwide most prevalent subtypes and CRFs (A, B, C, D, AE, F, G and AG), justifying their application in future trials aimed at global HIV cure.
潜伏的病毒库是 HIV 治愈道路上的主要障碍,临床清除方法的效果通常通过其对前病毒 DNA 的影响来评估。为了确保 HIV 治愈研究的包容性和代表性,迫切需要能够检测所有常见循环 HIV 亚型的前病毒 DNA 定量检测方法。在这里,使用数字 PCR 评估了针对三个不同基因组区域的三种 HIV DNA 检测方法在灵敏度和亚型耐受性方面的性能。
使用针对 gag(GAG)的亚型 B 特异性检测方法和针对 ltr 和 pol 中的保守序列的两种检测方法(LTR 和 JO),使用一系列连续稀释的亚型参考质粒以及一系列临床分离株,在数字 PCR(Bio-Rad QX200)中评估其灵敏度和亚型耐受性。这两个面板代表了亚型 A、B、C、D、F、G 和循环重组形式(CRF)AE 和 AG,它们共同占全球 94%的 HIV 感染。
观察到 HIV 亚型极大地影响了 HIV DNA 定量结果。对系列稀释质粒面板的稳健回归分析表明,GAG 检测方法仅能够线性定量亚型 B、D 和 G 分离株(4/13 个参考质粒,平均 R=0.99),而 LTR 和 JO 则能够定量所有测试的分离株(13/13 个参考质粒,分别平均 R=0.99 和 0.98)。在临床分离株面板中,如果所有重复都产生阳性结果,则认为分离株可检测。GAG 检测方法可以检测到五个亚型 B 中的四个和两个亚型 D 中的一个分离株中的 HIV DNA,而 LTR 和 JO 检测方法则可以检测到所有 29 个测试分离株中的 HIV DNA。LTR 和 JO 的结果被发现同样精确,但比 GAG 更精确。
这些结果表明,在研究非 B 亚型储库之前,需要仔细验证前病毒储库定量检测方法。LTR 和 JO 检测方法可以灵敏且可靠地定量代表全球最常见亚型和 CRF(A、B、C、D、AE、F、G 和 AG)的面板中的 HIV DNA,证明它们适用于旨在实现全球 HIV 治愈的未来试验。