Suppr超能文献

视觉-本体感觉匹配错误与距离判断偏差一致。

Visuo-Proprioceptive Matching Errors Are Consistent with Biases in Distance Judgments.

作者信息

Kuling Irene A, de Bruijne Willem J, Burgering Kimberley, Brenner Eli, Smeets Jeroen B J

机构信息

a Department of Human Movement Sciences , Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands .

b Institute of Neuroscience , Université Catholique de Louvain , Brussels , Belgium.

出版信息

J Mot Behav. 2019;51(5):572-579. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2018.1528435. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

Abstract

People make systematic errors when matching the location of an unseen index finger with that of a visual target. These errors are consistent over time, but idiosyncratic and surprisingly task-specific. The errors that are made when moving the unseen index finger to a visual target are not consistent with the errors when moving a visual target to the unseen index finger. To test whether such inconsistencies arise because a large part of the matching errors originate during movement execution, we compared errors in moving the unseen finger to a target with biases in deciding which of two visual targets was closer to the index finger before the movement. We found that the judgment as to which is the closest target was consistent with the matching errors. This means that inconsistencies in visuo-proprioceptive matching errors are not caused by systematic errors in movement execution, but are likely to be related to biases in sensory transformations.

摘要

人们在将未看见的食指位置与视觉目标位置进行匹配时会出现系统性错误。这些错误随时间保持一致,但具有个体特异性且令人惊讶地因任务而异。将未看见的食指移向视觉目标时所犯的错误与将视觉目标移向未看见的食指时的错误并不一致。为了测试这种不一致是否是因为很大一部分匹配错误产生于运动执行过程中,我们将把未看见的手指移向目标时的错误与在运动前判断两个视觉目标中哪一个更靠近食指的偏差进行了比较。我们发现关于哪个目标最接近的判断与匹配错误是一致的。这意味着视觉-本体感觉匹配错误中的不一致并非由运动执行中的系统性错误导致,而可能与感觉转换中的偏差有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验