Suppr超能文献

使用缝线纽扣植入物对三种下胫腓联合修复技术的生物力学比较

Biomechanical Comparison of 3 Syndesmosis Repair Techniques With Suture Button Implants.

作者信息

Parker Andrew S, Beason David P, Slowik Jonathan S, Sabatini Jefferson B, Waldrop Norman E

机构信息

American Sports Medicine Institute, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Oct 24;6(10):2325967118804204. doi: 10.1177/2325967118804204. eCollection 2018 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Suture button fixation of syndesmotic injury is growing in popularity, as it has been shown to provide adequate stability in a more cost-effective manner than screw fixation while allowing more physiologic distal tibiofibular joint motion. However, the optimal repair technique and implant orientation have yet to be determined.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare 3 suture button construct configurations/orientations for syndesmosis fixation: single, parallel, and divergent. The authors hypothesized that all 3 methods would provide adequate stabilization but that the divergent technique would be the most stable.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

The fixation strengths of 3 stabilization techniques with suture button devices were compared with 10 cadaveric legs each (N = 30). Ankle motion under cyclic loading was measured in multiple planes: first in the intact state, then following simulated syndesmosis injury, and then following fixation with 1 of 3 randomly assigned constructs-1 suture button, 2 suture buttons in parallel, and 2 divergent suture buttons. Finally, axial loading with external rotation was applied to failure.

RESULTS

All syndesmotic fixation methods provided stability to the torn state. There was no statistically significant difference among the 3 fixation techniques in biomechanical stability. Failure most commonly occurred through fibular fracture at supraphysiologic loads.

CONCLUSION

Suture button implant fixation for syndesmotic injury appears to provide stability to the torn syndesmosis, and the configuration of the fixation does not appear to affect the strength or security of the stabilization.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides further insight into the biomechanics and optimal configuration of suture button fixation of the torn syndesmosis. Based on these results, the addition of a second suture button may not significantly contribute to immediate postoperative stability.

摘要

背景

下胫腓联合损伤的缝线纽扣固定法越来越受欢迎,因为与螺钉固定相比,它能以更具成本效益的方式提供足够的稳定性,同时允许更符合生理的胫腓远端关节活动。然而,最佳修复技术和植入物方向尚未确定。

目的/假设:本研究的目的是对下胫腓联合固定的3种缝线纽扣结构配置/方向进行生物力学比较:单根、平行和发散。作者假设这3种方法都能提供足够的稳定性,但发散技术将是最稳定的。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

将3种缝线纽扣装置的固定技术的固定强度与10条尸体腿(N = 30)进行比较。在多个平面上测量循环加载下的踝关节运动:首先在完整状态下,然后在模拟下胫腓联合损伤后,然后在用3种随机分配的结构之一固定后——1个缝线纽扣、2个平行缝线纽扣和2个发散缝线纽扣。最后,施加轴向加载并外旋直至失效。

结果

所有下胫腓联合固定方法都为撕裂状态提供了稳定性。3种固定技术在生物力学稳定性方面没有统计学上的显著差异。失效最常见于超生理负荷下的腓骨骨折。

结论

缝线纽扣植入物固定下胫腓联合损伤似乎能为撕裂的下胫腓联合提供稳定性,并且固定的配置似乎不影响稳定性的强度或安全性。

临床意义

本研究进一步深入了解了缝线纽扣固定撕裂下胫腓联合的生物力学和最佳配置。基于这些结果,增加第二个缝线纽扣可能对术后即刻稳定性没有显著贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/181c/6202754/34dc9602fbf8/10.1177_2325967118804204-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验