Suppr超能文献

用于心脏质子波谱分析的基于心脏与基于膈肌的呼吸导航

Cardiac- versus diaphragm-based respiratory navigation for proton spectroscopy of the heart.

作者信息

Gastl Mareike, Peereboom Sophie M, Fuetterer Maximilian, Boenner Florian, Kelm Malte, Manka Robert, Kozerke Sebastian

机构信息

Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Gloriastrasse 35, 8092, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Cardiology, University Heart Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

MAGMA. 2019 Apr;32(2):259-268. doi: 10.1007/s10334-018-0711-y. Epub 2018 Oct 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study inter-individual differences of the relation between diaphragm and heart motion, the objective of the present study was to implement respiratory navigation on the heart and compare it against the established method of navigator gating on the diaphragm for single-voxel cardiac H-MRS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

H-MRS was performed on a 1.5T system in 19 healthy volunteers of mixed age (range 24-75 years). Spectra were recorded in a 6-8 ml voxel in the ventricular septum using a PRESS (point-resolved spectroscopy) sequence and ECG gating. Water-unsuppressed data acquired with pencil beam navigation on the heart were compared to data with navigation on the diaphragm. Water-suppressed data were obtained to assess triglyceride-to-water ratios.

RESULTS

Water phase and amplitude fluctuations for cardiac versus diaphragm navigation did not reveal significant differences. Both navigator positions provided comparable triglyceride-to-water ratios and gating efficiencies (coefficient of variation (CoV) 7.0%). The cardiac navigator showed a good reproducibility (CoV 5.2%).

DISCUSSION

Respiratory navigation on the heart does not convey an advantage over diaphragm-based navigator gating for cardiac H-MRS, but also no disadvantage. Consequently, cardiac and diaphragm respiratory navigation may be used interchangeably.

摘要

目的

为研究膈肌与心脏运动关系的个体差异,本研究旨在对心脏实施呼吸导航,并将其与用于单体素心脏氢磁共振波谱分析(H-MRS)的已确立的膈肌导航门控方法进行比较。

材料与方法

在一台1.5T系统上,对19名年龄各异(范围24 - 75岁)的健康志愿者进行H-MRS检查。使用点分辨波谱序列(PRESS)和心电图门控,在室间隔一个6 - 8毫升的体素中记录波谱。将通过心脏铅笔束导航采集的非水抑制数据与通过膈肌导航采集的数据进行比较。获取水抑制数据以评估甘油三酯与水的比率。

结果

心脏导航与膈肌导航的水相和幅度波动未显示出显著差异。两种导航位置提供了相当的甘油三酯与水的比率和门控效率(变异系数(CoV)7.0%)。心脏导航显示出良好的可重复性(CoV 5.2%)。

讨论

对于心脏H-MRS,心脏呼吸导航相对于基于膈肌的导航门控既没有优势,也没有劣势。因此,心脏和膈肌呼吸导航可以互换使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验