• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重构器官获取与移植网络合同,以实现政策一致性和基础设施卓越性。

Restructuring the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network contract to achieve policy coherence and infrastructure excellence.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Department of Mathematics, US Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2019 Jun;19(6):1622-1627. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15161. Epub 2018 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1111/ajt.15161
PMID:30378753
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6494733/
Abstract

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) went up for competitive bid again this year, yet this contract has been held by only 1 entity since its inception. The OPTN's scope has grown steadily, and it now embraces several disparate missions: to operate the computing and coordination infrastructure that maintains waitlists and makes organ offers in priority order, to regulate transplant centers and organ procurement organizations, to follow and protect living donors, and to decide organ allocation policy in concert with the many voices of the transplant community. The contracting process and performance work statement continue to discourage both innovative approaches to the OPTN and competitive bids outside of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), with evaluation criteria that either disqualify or strongly disadvantage new applicants. The performance work statement also emphasizes bureaucratic tasks while obligating the OPTN contractor to the specific committee structure that has impeded decision-making and tended to preserve the status quo in controversial matters. Finally, the UNOS computing infrastructure is antiquated and requires months to years to implement small changes. Restructuring the OPTN contract to separate the information technology requirements from the policy/regulatory responsibilities might allow more nimble and effective specialty contractors to offer their capabilities in service of the national transplant enterprise.

摘要

器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)今年再次进行竞争性招标,但自成立以来,该合同仅由 1 家实体持有。OPTN 的范围一直在稳步扩大,现在承担着几个不同的任务:运营计算机和协调基础设施,维护候补名单,并按优先级进行器官捐赠;监管移植中心和器官采购组织;跟踪和保护活体供者;并与移植界的众多声音一起决定器官分配政策。招标过程和绩效工作说明书继续阻碍 OPTN 的创新方法和 UNOS 之外的竞争性投标,评估标准要么取消资格,要么对新申请人造成严重不利。绩效工作说明书还强调官僚任务,同时要求 OPTN 承包商遵守特定的委员会结构,这阻碍了决策,并倾向于在有争议的问题上维持现状。最后,UNOS 的计算基础设施已经过时,实施小的更改需要数月甚至数年的时间。将 OPTN 合同的结构重组,将信息技术要求与政策/监管责任分开,可能会允许更灵活和有效的专业承包商提供其能力,为国家移植事业服务。

相似文献

1
Restructuring the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network contract to achieve policy coherence and infrastructure excellence.重构器官获取与移植网络合同,以实现政策一致性和基础设施卓越性。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jun;19(6):1622-1627. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15161. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
2
A legal roadmap.一份法律路线图。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Oct;19(10):2958-2959. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15521. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
3
Response to "Restructuring the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network contract to achieve policy coherence and infrastructure excellence".对《重组器官采购与移植网络合同以实现政策一致性和基础设施卓越》的回应
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jun;19(6):1607-1608. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15206. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
4
The oversight of solid organ transplantation in the United States.美国实体器官移植的监管
Am J Transplant. 2008 Apr;8(4):739-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02147.x. Epub 2008 Mar 2.
5
Organ transplantation for nonresidents of the United States: a policy for transparency.针对非美国居民的器官移植:一项透明度政策。
Am J Transplant. 2014 Aug;14(8):1740-3. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12770. Epub 2014 May 19.
6
Potential Implications of Recent and Proposed Changes in the Regulatory Oversight of Solid Organ Transplantation in the United States.美国实体器官移植监管监督方面近期及拟议变更的潜在影响。
Am J Transplant. 2016 Dec;16(12):3371-3377. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13955. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
7
National landscape of HIV+ to HIV+ kidney and liver transplantation in the United States.美国 HIV+ 患者间的肝肾移植的国家性概况。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Sep;19(9):2594-2605. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15494. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
8
Organ distribution without geographic boundaries: A possible framework for organ allocation.打破地域限制的器官分配:器官分配的一种可能框架。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Nov;18(11):2635-2640. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15115. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
9
Information design to support growth, quality, and equity of the US transplant system.支持美国移植系统的增长、质量和公平的信息设计。
Am J Transplant. 2023 Jan;23(1):5-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.10.005. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
10
Letter to the Editor in reply to: "Hardest-to-place kidney transplant outcomes in the United States" (published in: Am J Transplant 2021; 21:3663-3672.).致编辑的回信:回应《美国最难安置的肾移植结果》(发表于《美国移植杂志》2021年;21卷:3663 - 3672页)
Am J Transplant. 2022 Sep;22(9):2281-2282. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17043. Epub 2022 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of intense nursing care in improving anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.强化护理对改善肝癌患者焦虑、抑郁及生活质量的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 21;99(34):e21677. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021677.

本文引用的文献

1
From 6 years to 5 days for organ allocation policy change.器官分配政策从6年缩短至5天内改变。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 May;37(5):675-677. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2017.12.010. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
2
New Insights Into the Alleged Kidney Donor Profile Index Labeling Effect on Kidney Utilization.对所谓的供肾者特征指数标签效应对肾脏利用率影响的新认识
Am J Transplant. 2017 Oct;17(10):2696-2704. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14379. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
3
Fair is fair: We must re-allocate livers for transplant.公平就是公平:我们必须重新分配用于移植的肝脏。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 5;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0186-9.
4
Why do we have the kidney allocation system we have today? A history of the 2014 kidney allocation system.为什么我们拥有如今的肾脏分配系统?2014年肾脏分配系统的历史。
Hum Immunol. 2017 Jan;78(1):4-8. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
5
Potential Implications of Recent and Proposed Changes in the Regulatory Oversight of Solid Organ Transplantation in the United States.美国实体器官移植监管监督方面近期及拟议变更的潜在影响。
Am J Transplant. 2016 Dec;16(12):3371-3377. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13955. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
6
The history of trying to fix liver allocation: why a consensus approach will never work.
Clin Transplant. 2015 Jun;29(6):477-83. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12550. Epub 2015 May 26.
7
Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: collecting, analyzing, and reporting data on transplantation in the United States.美国移植受者科学登记处:收集、分析和报告美国移植数据。
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2013 Apr;27(2):50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2013.01.002. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
8
Better off living--the ethics of the new UNOS proposal for allocating kidneys for transplantation.生活得更好——联合国器官共享联合网络(UNOS)关于分配肾脏用于移植的新提议的伦理问题
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Sep;6(9):2310-2. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03310411.