Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary.
Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Apr 1;58(4):692-707. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key314.
To systematically review the accuracy and characteristics of different questionnaire-based PsA screening tools.
A systematic review of MEDLINE, Excerpta Medical Database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies that evaluated the accuracy of self-administered PsA screening tools for patients with psoriasis. A bivariate meta-analysis was used to pool screening tool-specific accuracy estimates (sensitivity and specificity). Heterogeneity of the diagnostic odds ratio was evaluated through meta-regression. All full-text records were assessed for risk of bias with the QUADAS 2 tool.
A total of 2280 references were identified and 130 records were assessed for full-text review, of which 42 were included for synthesis. Of these, 27 were included in quantitative syntheses. Of the records, 37% had an overall low risk of bias. Fourteen different screening tools and 104 separate accuracy estimates were identified. Pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates were calculated for the Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (cut-off = 44), Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation (47), Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screening (8), Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool (3) and Early Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Questionnaire (3). The Early Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Questionnaire reported the highest sensitivity and specificity (0.85 each). The I2 for the diagnostic odds ratios varied between 76 and 90.1%. Meta-regressions were conducted, in which the age, risk of bias for patient selection and the screening tool accounted for some of the observed heterogeneity.
Questionnaire-based tools have moderate accuracy to identify PsA among psoriasis patients. The Early Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Questionnaire appears to have slightly better accuracy compared with the Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screening, Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool and Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation. An economic evaluation could model the uncertainty and estimate the cost-effectiveness of PsA screening programs that use different tools.
系统评价基于问卷的银屑病关节炎(PsA)筛查工具的准确性和特征。
通过系统检索 MEDLINE、Excerpta Medical Database、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库和 Web of Science,以确定评估银屑病患者自我管理的 PsA 筛查工具准确性的研究。使用双变量 meta 分析汇总特定筛查工具的准确性估计值(敏感性和特异性)。通过 meta 回归评估诊断比值比的异质性。使用 QUADAS 2 工具评估所有全文记录的偏倚风险。
共确定了 2280 篇参考文献,对 130 篇记录进行了全文评估,其中 42 篇纳入了综合分析。其中,27 篇纳入了定量综合分析。在这些记录中,37%的记录整体偏倚风险较低。确定了 14 种不同的筛查工具和 104 个单独的准确性估计值。计算了 Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation(cut-off = 44)、Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation(47)、Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screening(8)、Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool(3)和 Early Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Questionnaire(3)的汇总敏感性和特异性估计值。Early Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Questionnaire 的敏感性和特异性最高(分别为 0.85)。诊断比值比的 I² 值在 76%至 90.1%之间变化。进行了 meta 回归,其中年龄、患者选择偏倚风险和筛查工具解释了部分观察到的异质性。
基于问卷的工具对识别银屑病患者中的 PsA 具有中等准确性。与 Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screening、Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Tool 和 Psoriatic Arthritis Screening and Evaluation 相比,Early Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Questionnaire 的准确性似乎略高。经济评估可以模拟不确定性并估计使用不同工具的 PsA 筛查计划的成本效益。