Bartner Lisa R, McGrath Stephanie, Drury Adam, Chen Annie V, Morris Arianne, Brewer Melissa, Hall Meri, Lappin Michael R
From the Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington.
J Vet Intern Med. 2018 Nov;32(6):1983-1988. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15288. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
Neurobartonellosis occurs in people. The role these organisms might play in inflammatory brain disease of dogs is unclear.
HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: That Bartonella spp. DNA would be amplified more commonly from the CSF of dogs with inflammatory disease compared to those with noninflammatory disease. To report the prevalence of Bartonella spp. in dogs with and without inflammatory CNS disease with a commercially available PCR assay.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from 172 dogs from either Washington State University or Colorado State University.
Retrospective study. A search was performed of all medical records from dogs with CSF samples submitted to CSU's Center for Companion Animal Studies or Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory from CSU or WSU for Toxoplasma or Neospora PCR assay. Increased CSF nucleated cell counts and an adequate volume of CSF must have been present to evaluate Bartonella spp. by PCR assay.
Inflammatory CNS disease was confirmed in 65 dogs, none of which were positive for Bartonella spp. DNA. Of the other 107 dogs, one was positive for B. henselae DNA. The CSF from this dog contained red blood cells.
Failure to amplify Bartonella spp. DNA from the CSF of the dogs with inflammatory disease suggests the organism was not involved in the etiology of the disease, the organism was in the CNS tissues but not in the CSF, or the organism was present but in quantities undetectable by this PCR assay. The combination of PCR and culture is the most sensitive way to detect Bartonella spp. and the use of that technique should be considered in future studies.
人可发生神经巴尔通体病。这些病原体在犬类炎性脑病中可能发挥的作用尚不清楚。
假设/目的:与非炎性疾病的犬相比,炎性疾病犬的脑脊液中巴尔通体属DNA更常被扩增。用一种市售的聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测法报告有或无炎性中枢神经系统疾病的犬中巴尔通体属的患病率。
来自华盛顿州立大学或科罗拉多州立大学的172只犬的脑脊液样本。
回顾性研究。对提交给科罗拉多州立大学伴侣动物研究中心或科罗拉多州立大学或华盛顿州立大学兽医诊断实验室进行弓形虫或新孢子虫PCR检测的、有脑脊液样本的犬的所有病历进行检索。脑脊液有核细胞计数增加且脑脊液量充足,才能通过PCR检测法评估巴尔通体属。
65只犬被确诊患有炎性中枢神经系统疾病,其中没有一只巴尔通体属DNA呈阳性。在其他107只犬中,有一只犬的亨氏巴尔通体DNA呈阳性。这只犬的脑脊液中含有红细胞。
未能从炎性疾病犬的脑脊液中扩增出巴尔通体属DNA,提示该病原体不参与该病的病因,该病原体存在于中枢神经系统组织而非脑脊液中,或者该病原体存在但数量低于此PCR检测法的可检测水平。PCR和培养相结合是检测巴尔通体属最敏感的方法,未来研究应考虑使用该技术。