Neupane Pradeep, Hegarty Barbara C, Marr Henry S, Maggi Ricardo G, Birkenheuer Adam J, Breitschwerdt Edward B
Department of Clinical Sciences and the Intracellular Pathogens Research Laboratory, Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
J Vet Intern Med. 2018 Nov;32(6):1958-1964. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15301. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
Because of poor sensitivity and questionable specificity of immunofluorescent antibody assays (IFAs), serological diagnosis of Bartonella species infections in dogs remains challenging. Despite limitations, IFA testing is the historical "gold standard" for Bartonella serodiagnosis in animals and humans. Because most diagnostic laboratories test against only 1 or 2 Bartonella spp., testing against a broader panel of Bartonella antigens may enhance diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of Bartonella IFA using 8 cell culture-grown Bartonella spp. isolates.
Archived serum samples from 34 Bartonella spp. naturally exposed, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive dogs and from 26 PCR-negative and IFA-negative dogs.
Bartonella IFA sensitivity and specificity were assessed using cell culture-grown whole cell antigens derived from 3 Bartonella henselae (Bh) strains (Bh Houston 1, Bh San Antonio Type 2, Bh California 1), 3 Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii genotypes (Bvb I, II, and III), Bartonella koehlerae (Bk), and Bartonella quintana (Bq).
Only 62% of 34 Bartonella spp. PCR-positive dogs were seroreactive to any of the 8 Bartonella IFA antigens, indicating low IFA sensitivity. PCR-positive dogs were most often IFA seroreactive to Bq (n = 15), to Bvb II (n = 13), or to both (n = 9) antigens. Of the 26 previously IFA-negative/PCR-negative dogs, 4 (15%) were seroreactive using the expanded antigen panel.
Despite IFA testing of dogs against 8 different Bartonella isolates, IFA sensitivity remained poor, and specificity was only 85%. Development of a reliable serological assay is needed to facilitate the diagnosis of Bartonella infection in dogs.
由于免疫荧光抗体检测(IFA)的敏感性较差且特异性存疑,犬巴尔通体属感染的血清学诊断仍然具有挑战性。尽管存在局限性,但IFA检测仍是动物和人类巴尔通体血清学诊断的历史“金标准”。由于大多数诊断实验室仅针对1种或2种巴尔通体进行检测,因此针对更广泛的巴尔通体抗原进行检测可能会提高诊断的敏感性和特异性。
使用8种细胞培养生长的巴尔通体属分离株评估巴尔通体IFA的敏感性和特异性。
来自34只自然暴露于巴尔通体属、聚合酶链反应(PCR)阳性犬以及26只PCR阴性和IFA阴性犬的存档血清样本。
使用源自3株亨氏巴尔通体(Bh)菌株(Bh休斯顿1型、Bh圣安东尼奥2型、Bh加利福尼亚1型)、3种文森巴尔通体亚种伯克霍夫ii基因型(Bvb I、II和III)、科氏巴尔通体(Bk)和五日热巴尔通体(Bq)的细胞培养生长的全细胞抗原评估巴尔通体IFA的敏感性和特异性。
34只巴尔通体属PCR阳性犬中,只有62%对8种巴尔通体IFA抗原中的任何一种呈血清反应性,表明IFA敏感性较低。PCR阳性犬最常对Bq(n = 15)、Bvb II(n = 13)或两种抗原(n = 9)呈IFA血清反应性。在26只先前IFA阴性/PCR阴性的犬中,4只(15%)使用扩展抗原组呈血清反应性。
尽管对犬进行了针对8种不同巴尔通体分离株的IFA检测,但IFA敏感性仍然较差,特异性仅为85%。需要开发一种可靠的血清学检测方法以促进犬巴尔通体感染的诊断。