Kemp J A, Marshall G R, Wong E H, Woodruff G N
Br J Pharmacol. 1987 Jul;91(3):601-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1987.tb11253.x.
The abilities of some benzodiazepine-receptor agonists, antagonists and inverse agonists to modulate the inhibitory potency of the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A-receptor agonist, isoguvacine, on the CA1 population spike recorded from slices of rat hippocampus, were determined. Concentration-response curves were constructed of the extent to which the benzodiazepine-receptor ligands shifted the isoguvacine concentration-response curve to the left or right. These were compared to their displacement curves of [3H]-Ro15-1788 binding to rat hippocampal membranes under near physiological assay conditions. The above comparisons suggest that the effect on the potency of isoguvacine produced by the benzodiazepine-receptor agonists, diazepam and flunitrazepam, and the partial agonists, Ro16-6028 and Ro17-1812, closely parallels their degree of benzodiazepine-receptor occupancy. Thus, the partial agonists, Ro16-6028 and Ro17-1812, were unable to produce as large a maximum response as the full agonists, diazepam and flunitrazepam. The maximum effects produced by diazepam, flunitrazepam, Ro16-6028, Ro17-1812, the antagonist, propyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate, and the inverse agonist, methyl-6, 7-dimethyl-4-ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate (DMCM), on the potency of isoguvacine in the hippocampal slice corresponded to the change in their affinities produced by the addition of GABA in the radioligand binding studies (GABA-shift). This suggests that the changes in affinity of benzodiazepine-receptor ligands produced by GABAA-receptor activation reflects their ability to modify GABAA-receptor function. The benzodiazepine-receptor antagonists, Ro15-1788 and CGS 8216, had apparent agonist and inverse agonist effects, respectively, on the potency of isoguvacine. These effects occurred at concentrations above those required for saturation of the benzodiazepine-receptor, as labelled by [3H]-Ro15-1788, and were not in agreement with the absence of any effect of GABAA-receptor stimulation in the GABA-shift experiments. This indicates that these events are not mediated by an action at the classical benzodiazepine-receptor site. 6 It is concluded that hippocampal GABAA-receptor function can be allosterically modulated in a manner consistent with the agonist/inverse-agonist model of benzodiazepine-receptor activation, and that compounds exist with varying efficacies throughout this range.
测定了一些苯二氮䓬受体激动剂、拮抗剂和反向激动剂对γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)A受体激动剂异谷氨酰胺调节大鼠海马切片CA1群体峰电位抑制效能的能力。构建了苯二氮䓬受体配体使异谷氨酰胺浓度-反应曲线向左或向右移动程度的浓度-反应曲线。将这些曲线与在接近生理检测条件下[3H]-Ro15-1788与大鼠海马膜结合的置换曲线进行比较。上述比较表明,苯二氮䓬受体激动剂地西泮和氟硝西泮以及部分激动剂Ro16-6028和Ro17-1812对异谷氨酰胺效能的影响与其苯二氮䓬受体占据程度密切平行。因此,部分激动剂Ro16-6028和Ro17-1812不能产生与完全激动剂地西泮和氟硝西泮一样大的最大反应。地西泮、氟硝西泮、Ro16-6028、Ro17-1812、拮抗剂丙基-β-咔啉-3-羧酸盐和反向激动剂甲基-6,7-二甲基-4-乙基-β-咔啉-3-羧酸盐(DMCM)对海马切片中异谷氨酰胺效能的最大影响与放射性配体结合研究中添加GABA产生的亲和力变化(GABA位移)相对应。这表明GABAA受体激活引起的苯二氮䓬受体配体亲和力变化反映了它们修饰GABAA受体功能的能力。苯二氮䓬受体拮抗剂Ro15-1788和CGS 8216分别对异谷氨酰胺的效能有明显的激动剂和反向激动剂作用。这些作用发生在高于[3H]-Ro15-1788标记的苯二氮䓬受体饱和所需的浓度,并且与GABA位移实验中GABAA受体刺激无任何作用不一致。这表明这些事件不是由经典苯二氮䓬受体位点的作用介导的。6得出结论,海马GABAA受体功能可以以与苯二氮䓬受体激活的激动剂/反向激动剂模型一致的方式进行变构调节,并且在整个范围内存在具有不同效力的化合物。