Keogh Fiona, Pierce Maria, Neylon Karen, Fleming Padraic
Centre for Economic and Social Research on Dementia (CESRD), ILAS Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, Newcastle Road, Galway, Ireland.
Genio, 19-21 Westland Square, Dublin 2, Ireland.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 1;18(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3630-8.
Dementia presents a significant challenge to health systems and to the person and family affected. Home care is increasingly seen as a key service in addressing this challenge in a person-centred and cost-effective way. Intensive Home Care Packages (IHCPs) were introduced in Ireland to provide personalised and high levels of support for people with dementia to remain at home or be discharged home from hospital, and to build on the work of the HSE & Genio Dementia Programme. This realist evaluation is concerned with real world questions of feasibility and effectiveness; specifically understanding in what ways IHCPs work, how optimum outcomes are achieved, for whom and in what contexts do IHCPs work best.
A mixed-method, multi-stakeholder study was designed within a realist evaluation conceptual framework. The process evaluation includes semi-structured interviews with health service staff at all levels, social network analysis and secondary database analysis; the outcomes evaluation includes quantitative measures and qualitative data collected through in-depth interviews with people with dementia and family carers; and the cost evaluation includes analysis of data from the Resource Utilisation in Dementia (RUD). The four stage cycle of realist evaluation is adopted, with iterative rounds of theory formulation, data collection and theory testing throughout.
This realist evaluation of a complex intervention involves a variety of data and perspectives in order to provide confidence in moving from hypothetical constructs about how IHCPs might work to explanations of potential or observable causal mechanisms. In spite of being a key form of service delivery in most healthcare systems, the ways in which home care works to produce the desired outcomes seems to be poorly understood. While there is much descriptive and comparative work, there is a lack of understanding regarding which patient groups might benefit most from home care, or the influence of different service or cultural contexts on outcomes from home care. As well as addressing the core research objectives, this study aims to make a contribution to the underlying theory of home care in ways that can progress our understanding of how outcomes are produced for home care recipients.
痴呆症给卫生系统以及受影响的个人和家庭带来了重大挑战。家庭护理越来越被视为以个人为中心且具有成本效益的方式应对这一挑战的关键服务。爱尔兰引入了强化家庭护理包(IHCPs),为痴呆症患者提供个性化和高水平的支持,使其能够居家或从医院出院回家,并以卫生服务执行局(HSE)和杰尼奥痴呆症项目的工作为基础。这项现实主义评估关注可行性和有效性等现实世界问题;具体而言,要了解IHCPs如何发挥作用、如何实现最佳结果、对哪些人有效以及在何种情况下IHCPs效果最佳。
在现实主义评估概念框架内设计了一项混合方法、多利益相关者研究。过程评估包括对各级卫生服务人员的半结构化访谈、社会网络分析和二次数据库分析;结果评估包括定量测量以及通过对痴呆症患者和家庭照顾者的深入访谈收集的定性数据;成本评估包括对痴呆症资源利用(RUD)数据的分析。采用现实主义评估的四个阶段循环,在整个过程中进行理论构建、数据收集和理论测试的迭代循环。
对一项复杂干预措施的这种现实主义评估涉及多种数据和观点,以便有信心从关于IHCPs可能如何发挥作用的假设构想转向对潜在或可观察到的因果机制的解释。尽管家庭护理是大多数医疗系统中一种关键的服务提供形式,但人们似乎对家庭护理如何产生预期结果的方式了解甚少。虽然有很多描述性和比较性工作,但对于哪些患者群体可能从家庭护理中受益最大,或者不同服务或文化背景对家庭护理结果的影响缺乏了解。除了实现核心研究目标外,本研究旨在以能够增进我们对家庭护理接受者如何产生结果的理解的方式,为家庭护理的基础理论做出贡献。