State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China; Plant Protection College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China; Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China.
State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China; Plant Protection College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China; Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China; Faculty of Agriculture, Sylhet Agricultural University, Sylhet 3100, Bangladesh.
Microbiol Res. 2018 Dec;217:34-50. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2018.08.016. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) can be established as endophytes in the host plants to offer a long-term preventive measure for pests and diseases. This practice serves as a better alternative to the common practice of periodic direct application of EPF on plants or the target pests as a short-term defense strategy against pests and diseases. These fungal endophytes, aside from their role in pests and diseases prevention, also act as plant growth promoters. Several fungal endophytes have been associated with improvement in plant height, dry and wet weight and other growth parameters. However, many limiting factors have been identified as mitigating the successful colonization of the host plants by EPF. The inoculation methods used have been identified as one, but sadly, this has received little or less attention. Some previous studies carried out comparison between various artificial inoculation methods; foliar application, seedling dipping, soil drenching, seed inoculation, direct injection and others. In separate studies, some authors had suggested different application methods that are best suitable for certain fungal entomopathogens. For instance, leaf inoculation with conidial suspensions was suggested to be the best inoculation method for Beauveria bassiana in sorghum, stem injection was suggested as the most suitable for coffee, while, root dipping method proved the most successful for B. bassiana colonization of tomato plants for the management of Helicoverpa armigera. Here, we discussed entomopathogenic fungal endophytes as bio-control agents, plant growth promoters and highlighted the effect of various artificial inoculation methods on their endophytic colonization of the host plants.
昆虫病原真菌 (EPF) 可以在宿主植物中建立内生菌,为病虫害提供长期的预防措施。这种做法是替代定期直接在植物或目标害虫上施用 EPF 的常见做法的更好选择,因为这是一种针对病虫害的短期防御策略。这些真菌内生菌除了在病虫害防治中发挥作用外,还可以作为植物生长促进剂。已经发现几种真菌内生菌与提高植物的高度、干重和湿重以及其他生长参数有关。然而,已经确定了许多限制因素,这些因素会减轻 EPF 对宿主植物的成功定殖。使用的接种方法被确定为一个因素,但遗憾的是,这一点几乎没有得到关注。一些先前的研究比较了各种人工接种方法;叶面喷施、幼苗浸泡、土壤淋洗、种子接种、直接注射等。在单独的研究中,一些作者提出了不同的应用方法,这些方法最适合某些真菌昆虫病原物。例如,用分生孢子悬浮液进行叶接种被建议是高粱上球孢白僵菌的最佳接种方法,茎注射被建议是咖啡最适合的方法,而根浸泡方法被证明是最成功的方法,可以促进 B. bassiana 定殖番茄植物,以防治棉铃虫。在这里,我们讨论了昆虫病原真菌内生菌作为生物防治剂、植物生长促进剂,并强调了各种人工接种方法对其内生菌定殖宿主植物的影响。