Azeem Muhammad, Ul Haq Arfan, Ul Hamid Waheed, Hayat Muhammad Burhan, Khan Dalia Iftikhar, Ahmed Arfa, Khan Mahwish Tahir
Department of Orthodontics, Dental Section, Faisalabad Medical University/Punjab Medical College, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Department of Orthodontics, Dental Section, Faisalabad Medical University/Punjab Medical College, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Int Orthod. 2018 Dec;16(4):665-675. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
Different treatment protocols have been implemented for management of Class III malocclusion with aim of achieving ideal occlusal goals. The aim of current study was to compare the efficiency of Class III treatment with mandibular 2-premolar extraction and mandibular molar distalization protocol.
This retrospective cross sectional study was conducted on pre-treatment and post-treatment dental casts of 60 orthodontic patients who had Class III malocclusion and were treated with a mandibular dentition distalization and mandibular 2-premolars extraction protocol. The study was conducted at orthodontic departments of Dental Section, Faisalabad Medical University/Punjab Medical College and de'Montmorency College of Dentistry, Pakistan. The sample was classified into 2 groups. Group A consisted of 30 patients (20 females, 10 males) (mean age, 18.02years) treated with distalization protocol and Group B consisted of 30 patients (18 females, 12 males) (mean age, 18.97years) treated with mandibular 2-premolars extraction protocol. To compare the efficiency of the treatment protocol in each group, the initial and final occlusal results were assessed on dental models using PAR index while treatment efficiency was assessed using a treatment efficiency index (TX). The groups were compared with t and Mann-Whitney tests.
There were no significant differences in the initial age, treatment time, treatment efficiency and any occlusal feature between the groups.
Treatment efficiency of Class III malocclusions with mandibular 2-premolar extractions or mandibular dentition distalization protocol is similar.
为了实现理想的咬合目标,已针对III类错牙合的治疗实施了不同的治疗方案。本研究的目的是比较下颌第二前磨牙拔除和下颌磨牙远移方案治疗III类错牙合的效率。
本回顾性横断面研究对60例患有III类错牙合且采用下颌牙列远移和下颌第二前磨牙拔除方案治疗的正畸患者的治疗前和治疗后牙模进行。该研究在巴基斯坦费萨拉巴德医科大学/旁遮普医学院牙科学院正畸科以及德蒙特莫伦西牙科学院进行。样本分为2组。A组由30例患者(20名女性,10名男性)(平均年龄18.02岁)组成,采用远移方案治疗;B组由30例患者(18名女性,12名男性)(平均年龄18.97岁)组成,采用下颌第二前磨牙拔除方案治疗。为了比较每组治疗方案的效率,使用PAR指数在牙模上评估初始和最终的咬合结果,同时使用治疗效率指数(TX)评估治疗效率。两组采用t检验和曼-惠特尼检验进行比较。
两组在初始年龄、治疗时间、治疗效率和任何咬合特征方面均无显著差异。
下颌第二前磨牙拔除或下颌牙列远移方案治疗III类错牙合的治疗效率相似。