Jenny Alderden is an assistant professor, School of Nursing, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, and an adjunct assistant professor, College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. Ginette Alyce Pepper is a professor, and Andrew Wilson is a clinical assistant professor, College of Nursing, University of Utah. Joanne D. Whitney is a professor, College of Nursing, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Stephanie Richardson is a professor, Rocky Mountain University of the Health Professions, Provo, Utah. Ryan Butcher is a senior data architect, Biomedical Informatics Team, Center for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Utah. Yeonjung Jo is a doctoral (PhD) student in population health science, College of Nursing, University of Utah. Mollie Rebecca Cummins is a professor, College of Nursing, University of Utah.
Am J Crit Care. 2018 Nov;27(6):461-468. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2018525.
Hospital-acquired pressure injuries are a serious problem among critical care patients. Some can be prevented by using measures such as specialty beds, which are not feasible for every patient because of costs. However, decisions about which patient would benefit most from a specialty bed are difficult because results of existing tools to determine risk for pressure injury indicate that most critical care patients are at high risk.
To develop a model for predicting development of pressure injuries among surgical critical care patients.
Data from electronic health records were divided into training (67%) and testing (33%) data sets, and a model was developed by using a random forest algorithm via the R package "randomforest."
Among a sample of 6376 patients, hospital-acquired pressure injuries of stage 1 or greater (outcome variable 1) developed in 516 patients (8.1%) and injuries of stage 2 or greater (outcome variable 2) developed in 257 (4.0%). Random forest models were developed to predict stage 1 and greater and stage 2 and greater injuries by using the testing set to evaluate classifier performance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for both models was 0.79.
This machine-learning approach differs from other available models because it does not require clinicians to input information into a tool (eg, the Braden Scale). Rather, it uses information readily available in electronic health records. Next steps include testing in an independent sample and then calibration to optimize specificity.
医院获得性压力性损伤是重症监护患者的一个严重问题。一些可以通过使用特殊床等措施来预防,但是由于成本原因,并非每个患者都可行。然而,决定哪些患者最受益于特殊床是困难的,因为现有的压力性损伤风险评估工具的结果表明,大多数重症监护患者风险很高。
为外科重症监护患者开发一种预测压力性损伤发展的模型。
电子健康记录中的数据分为训练(67%)和测试(33%)数据集,并通过 R 包“randomforest”中的随机森林算法开发模型。
在 6376 名患者的样本中,有 516 名(8.1%)患者发生了 1 期或更高级别的医院获得性压力性损伤(结局变量 1),有 257 名(4.0%)患者发生了 2 期或更高级别的损伤(结局变量 2)。开发了随机森林模型,通过测试集评估分类器性能,预测 1 期及以上和 2 期及以上的损伤。两个模型的受试者工作特征曲线下面积均为 0.79。
这种机器学习方法与其他可用模型不同,因为它不需要临床医生在工具中输入信息(例如,Braden 量表)。相反,它使用电子健康记录中现成的信息。下一步包括在独立样本中进行测试,然后进行校准以优化特异性。