Suppr超能文献

在肾移植患者中,拇收肌厚度与肌肉质量和去脂体重的关联度较低。

Adductor pollicis muscle thickness has a low association with muscle mass and lean mass in kidney transplantation patients.

作者信息

Dos Reis Aline S, Santos Heitor O, Limirio Larissa S, de Oliveira Erick P

机构信息

School of Medicine, Federal University of Uberlandia (UFU), Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

School of Medicine, Federal University of Uberlandia (UFU), Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018 Dec;28:110-113. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The use of adductor pollicis muscle thickness (APMT) as a predictor of muscle and lean mass is not fully understood and little is known whether the APMT evaluation presents advantages when compared to simpler anthropometric measurements, such as body weight. We aimed to associate APMT, alone and plus body weight, with muscle mass and lean mass in kidney transplantation patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out with 129 kidney transplantation patients of both sexes that presented a high time of kidney transplant (95.6 ± 78.3 months). Body weight and height were performed and APMT was measured using a caliper. Lean mass and muscle mass were estimated by bioelectrical impedance.

RESULTS

After linear regression analysis, APMT explained the variances of muscle mass and lean mass by 20% (R = 0.208; β = 0.456; p < 0.001) and by 26% (R = 0.264; β = 0.514; p < 0.001), respectively. Body weight predicted muscle mass by 21% (R = 0.216; β = 0.465; p < 0.001) and lean mass by 68% (R = 0.684; β = 0.828; p < 0.001). Analyzing weight plus APMT, the prediction of muscle mass and lean mass increased by 8% (R = 0.29; β = 0.325; p < 0.001) and by 3% (R = 0.71; β = 0.749; p < 0.001), respectively; when compared to weight alone.

CONCLUSION

Compared with body weight, APMT presented a similar association with muscle mass, but showed a lower prediction of lean mass. In this way, the evaluation of body weight, instead of APMT, seems to have a better cost-benefit to predict both muscle mass and lean mass in kidney transplantation patients.

摘要

背景与目的

使用拇收肌厚度(APMT)作为肌肉量和去脂体重的预测指标尚未得到充分理解,与体重等更简单的人体测量指标相比,APMT评估是否具有优势也鲜为人知。我们旨在研究单独的APMT以及APMT加上体重与肾移植患者的肌肉量和去脂体重之间的关系。

方法

对129例肾移植时间较长(95.6±78.3个月)的男女肾移植患者进行了一项横断面研究。测量了体重和身高,并使用卡尺测量了APMT。通过生物电阻抗法估算去脂体重和肌肉量。

结果

线性回归分析后,APMT分别解释了肌肉量和去脂体重方差的20%(R = 0.208;β = 0.456;p < 0.001)和26%(R = 0.264;β = 0.514;p < 0.001)。体重分别预测了21%的肌肉量(R = 0.216;β = 0.465;p < 0.001)和68%的去脂体重(R = 0.684;β = 0.828;p < 0.001)。分析体重加APMT时,与单独体重相比,肌肉量和去脂体重的预测分别增加了8%(R = 0.29;β = 0.325;p < 0.001)和3%(R = 0.71;β = 0.749;p < 0.001)。

结论

与体重相比,APMT与肌肉量的关联相似,但对去脂体重的预测较低。因此,在预测肾移植患者的肌肉量和去脂体重方面,评估体重而非APMT似乎具有更好的成本效益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验