比较模压法和 CAD/CAM 铣削法制作的瓷贴面的边缘适合性和内部适合性,并使用 2 种不同的树脂水门汀进行粘结。
A comparison of the marginal and internal fit of porcelain laminate veneers fabricated by pressing and CAD-CAM milling and cemented with 2 different resin cements.
机构信息
Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST), Irbid, Jordan.
Graduate student, Department of Prosthodontics, Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST), Irbid, Jordan.
出版信息
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Mar;121(3):470-476. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
The marginal and internal adaptations of porcelain laminate veneers (PLVs) are key elements in their long-term success. However, the marginal and internal fit obtained with a pressable material compared with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) needs further investigation as does the choice of cement used.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal and internal fit of PLVs fabricated using pressing and CAD-CAM milling and cemented using 2 types of composite resin cement.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Twenty PLVs were fabricated from VITA PM9 pressable material, and 20 veneers were milled using VITA Blocs Mark II. Veneers were cemented to composite resin dies using either RelyX Veneer cement or Variolink-N cement. Specimens were embedded in clear resin and sectioned incisogingivally and mesiodistally. Marginal discrepancy at the incisal and cervical positions and the internal gap at 6 different locations were evaluated by using a scanning electron microscope. Two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey multiple comparisons were used to examine difference among groups (α=.05).
RESULTS
The cement and fabrication methods did not show any significant effect for absolute marginal gap (AMG) at the incisal edge, AMG at the cervical margin or marginal gap at the incisal edge. However, both had a significant effect on marginal gap at the cervical margin (P=.038 for the fabrication method and P=.050 for the cement used). Also, both cement and fabrication methods had a significant effect on internal gap average (P<.001). The lowest gap values were reported for veneers fabricated from VITA PM9 by using the press technique and cemented with RelyX Veneer cement. When the position of gap measurements was taken into consideration, it was the only significant factor (P<.001 for the effect of position on AMG and P<.001 for the effect of position on marginal gap). Gaps at the cervical position were significantly lower than gaps at the incisal position.
CONCLUSIONS
Smaller marginal and internal discrepancies were recorded for PLVs fabricated by using the pressing technique and cemented using RelyX Veneer cement compared with milled veneers and Variolink-N cement. Larger discrepancies were present incisally than cervically.
问题陈述
瓷贴面(PLV)的边缘和内部适应性是其长期成功的关键因素。然而,与计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造(CAD-CAM)相比,可压材料获得的边缘和内部适配性以及所使用的水泥类型仍需要进一步研究。
目的
本体外研究的目的是评估使用压制和 CAD-CAM 铣削制造的 PLV 的边缘和内部适配性,并使用 2 种复合树脂水泥进行粘接。
材料和方法
从 VITA PM9 可压材料中制作 20 个 PLV,从 VITA Blocs Mark II 中铣削 20 个贴面。将贴面用 RelyX Veneer 水泥或 Variolink-N 水泥粘接到复合树脂模具上。将样本嵌入透明树脂中,并进行切龈向和近远中向切片。使用扫描电子显微镜评估 6 个不同位置的切缘和颈缘处的边缘不匹配以及内部间隙。使用双向方差分析(ANOVA)和 Tukey 多重比较检验组间差异(α=.05)。
结果
水泥和制造方法对切缘处的绝对边缘间隙(AMG)、颈缘处的 AMG 或切缘处的边缘间隙均无显著影响。然而,两者对颈缘处的边缘间隙均有显著影响(制造方法的 P=.038,水泥的 P=.050)。此外,水泥和制造方法对内部间隙平均值均有显著影响(P<.001)。使用 VITA PM9 压制技术制造并用 RelyX Veneer 水泥粘接的贴面报告的间隙值最低。当考虑间隙测量位置时,这是唯一的显著因素(对 AMG 的位置影响的 P<.001,对边缘间隙的位置影响的 P<.001)。颈缘处的间隙明显低于切缘处的间隙。
结论
与铣削贴面和 Variolink-N 水泥相比,使用压制技术制造并用 RelyX Veneer 水泥粘接的 PLV 的边缘和内部不匹配较小。切缘处的不匹配大于颈缘处的不匹配。