Periodontal Research group, School of Dentistry, University of Birmingham and Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
School of Pharmacy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 3;8(11):e024503. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024503.
Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) impose a significant health and economic burden. This study aimed to assess the differential attendance patterns of public to different healthcare professionals and gauge the opinions of key stakeholders towards screening of NCDs by allied healthcare professionals.
Questionnaires were designed piloted and subsequently completed by key stakeholders. The results were analysed descriptively.
Public questionnaires were undertaken in a West Midlands transport station and Public Markets. High street dental and community pharmacy settings were selected via local clinical and research networks. Healthcare professionals were identified using professional networks and were emailed a web link to an online survey.
1371 members of the public, 1548 patients and 222 healthcare professionals (doctors general practitioner (GP), dentists general dental practitioner (GDP) and pharmacists) completed the questionnaires.
The outcome was to compare attendance patterns at GDP and GP practices to determine whether different populations were more likely to access different healthcare professionals, this included determining when patients were last screened for NCDs by their GP. Additionally, the willingness of patients to undergo the required intervention and the opinions of stakeholders regarding the concept of screening for the specified NCDs in general dental and community pharmacy settings were also explored.
12% of patients who reported seeing a GDP biannually reported that they had not had contact with a GP in the last year. Over 61% of the public reported attending a GDP biannually, of this group 48% reported having never had a check-up at the GP. All stakeholders surveyed were in broad support of the concept of allied health professionals undertaking screening for specific general health conditions.
This study has established that allied healthcare professionals may have access to different cohorts of the population to GPs. If GDPs and pharmacists have access to patients who are not using healthcare services elsewhere, they may be ideally placed to risk assess, and where appropriate offer preventative advice and test for NCDs.
非传染性疾病(NCDs)对健康和经济造成了重大负担。本研究旨在评估公众对不同医疗保健专业人员的就诊模式差异,并衡量利益攸关方对辅助医疗保健专业人员进行 NCD 筛查的看法。
设计了调查问卷,并由利益攸关方进行了试点和后续填写。结果进行了描述性分析。
在西米德兰兹交通站和公共市场进行了公众问卷调查。通过当地临床和研究网络选择了高街牙科和社区药房环境。通过专业网络确定了医疗保健专业人员,并向他们发送了在线调查的网络链接。
1371 名公众、1548 名患者和 222 名医疗保健专业人员(全科医生、普通牙科医生和药剂师)完成了问卷调查。
将 GDP 和全科医生实践的就诊模式进行比较,以确定不同人群是否更有可能接触不同的医疗保健专业人员,包括确定患者上次接受全科医生 NCD 筛查的时间。此外,还探讨了患者接受所需干预的意愿以及利益相关者对一般牙科和社区药房环境中指定 NCD 筛查概念的看法。
报告每两年看一次 GDP 的 12%的患者表示,他们在过去一年中没有与全科医生联系过。超过 61%的公众每两年看一次 GDP,其中 48%的人表示从未在全科医生那里进行过检查。所有接受调查的利益攸关方都广泛支持辅助医疗保健专业人员对特定一般健康状况进行筛查的概念。
本研究表明,辅助医疗保健专业人员可能接触到全科医生之外的不同人群。如果 GDP 和药剂师能够接触到未在其他地方使用医疗服务的患者,他们可能处于理想的位置进行风险评估,并在适当情况下提供预防建议并测试 NCD。