Department of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Psychology and Logopedics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Psychol Med. 2019 Oct;49(13):2158-2167. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718002982. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
Normative and pathological personality traits have rarely been integrated into a joint large-scale structural analysis with psychiatric disorders, although a recent study suggested they entail a common individual differences continuum.
We explored the joint factor structure of 11 psychiatric disorders, five personality-disorder trait domains (DSM-5 Section III), and five normative personality trait domains (the 'Big Five') in a population-based sample of 2796 Norwegian twins, aged 19‒46.
Three factors could be interpreted: (i) a general risk factor for all psychopathology, (ii) a risk factor specific to internalizing disorders and traits, and (iii) a risk factor specific to externalizing disorders and traits. Heritability estimates for the three risk factor scores were 48% (95% CI 41‒54%), 35% (CI 28‒42%), and 37% (CI 31‒44%), respectively. All 11 disorders had uniform loadings on the general factor (congruence coefficient of 0.991 with uniformity). Ignoring sign and excluding the openness trait, this uniformity of factor loadings held for all the personality trait domains and all disorders (congruence 0.983).
Based on our findings, future research should investigate joint etiologic and transdiagnostic models for normative and pathological personality and other psychopathology.
尽管最近的一项研究表明,规范和病理人格特质涉及到一个共同的个体差异连续体,但它们很少被整合到一个包含精神障碍的联合大规模结构分析中。
我们在一个基于人群的 2796 名挪威双胞胎样本(年龄在 19-46 岁之间)中,探索了 11 种精神障碍、5 种人格障碍特质领域(DSM-5 第 III 节)和 5 种规范人格特质领域(“大五”)的联合因素结构。
可以解释三个因素:(i)所有精神病理学的一般风险因素,(ii)特定于内化障碍和特质的风险因素,以及(iii)特定于外化障碍和特质的风险因素。三个风险因素得分的遗传率估计分别为 48%(95%CI 41-54%)、35%(CI 28-42%)和 37%(CI 31-44%)。所有 11 种障碍在一般因素上都有统一的负荷(一致性系数为 0.991)。忽略符号并排除开放性特质,这种因素负荷的一致性适用于所有人格特质领域和所有障碍(一致性为 0.983)。
基于我们的发现,未来的研究应该调查规范和病理人格以及其他精神病理学的联合病因和跨诊断模型。