Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics,Richmond,VA,USA.
Department of Psychology,University of Minnesota,Minneapolis,MN,USA.
Psychol Med. 2019 Jun;49(8):1392-1399. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000047. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
Can the structure of genetic and environmental influences on normative personality traits (NPTs), abnormal personality traits (APTs), and DSM-IV criteria for personality disorders (PD) fit a high or low congruence model positing, respectively, close or more limited etiologic continuity?
Exploratory factor analysis was applied to transformed correlation matrices from Cholesky twin decompositions obtained in OpenMx. In 2801 adult twins from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health Twin Panel, NPTs and APTs were assessed by self-report using the Big Five Inventory (BFI) and PID-5-Norwegian Brief Form (PID-5-NBF), respectively. PDs were assessed at interview using the Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality (SIDP-IV).
The best model yielded three genetic and three unique environmental factors. Genetic factors were dominated, respectively, by (i) high loadings on nearly all PDs and NPT/APT neuroticism and compulsivity, (ii) negative loadings on NPT agreeableness/conscientiousness and positive loadings on APT/PD measures of antisocial traits, and (iii) negative loadings on NPT extraversion and histrionic PD, and positive loadings on APT detachment and schizoid/avoidant PD. Unique environmental factors were dominated, by (i) high loadings on all PDs, (ii) high loadings on all APT dimensions and NPT neuroticism, and (iii) negative loadings on NPT extraversion and positive loadings on NPT detachment/avoidant PD.
Two genetic and one environmental common factor were consistent with a high congruence model while one genetic and two environmental factors were more supportive of a low congruence model. The relationship between genetic and environmental influences on personality assessed by NPTs, APTs, and PDs is complex and does not fit easily into a low or high congruence model.
遗传和环境对规范人格特质(NPT)、异常人格特质(APT)和 DSM-IV 人格障碍(PD)标准的影响结构能否符合分别假设密切或更有限的病因连续性的高或低一致性模型?
使用 OpenMx 中的 Cholesky 双胞胎分解转换相关矩阵进行探索性因素分析。在挪威公共卫生研究所双胞胎小组的 2801 名成年双胞胎中,使用大五人格量表(BFI)和 PID-5-挪威简明形式(PID-5-NBF)通过自我报告评估 NPT 和 APT,分别。使用 DSM-IV 人格结构访谈(SIDP-IV)进行访谈以评估 PD。
最佳模型产生了三个遗传和三个独特的环境因素。遗传因素分别由(i)几乎所有 PD 和 NPT/APT 神经质和强迫性的高负荷,(ii)NPT 宜人性/尽责性的负负荷和 APT/PD 反社会特质的正负荷,以及(iii)NPT 外向性和表演型 PD 的负负荷和 APT 分离和分裂型/回避型 PD 的正负荷主导。独特的环境因素分别由(i)所有 PD 的高负荷,(ii)所有 APT 维度和 NPT 神经质的高负荷,以及(iii)NPT 外向性的负负荷和 NPT 分离/回避型 PD 的正负荷主导。
两个遗传因素和一个环境共同因素与高一致性模型一致,而一个遗传因素和两个环境因素更支持低一致性模型。NPT、APT 和 PD 评估的遗传和环境对人格的影响之间的关系是复杂的,不易符合低或高一致性模型。