Department of Mental Disorders, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Norway.
Addiction. 2018 Jan;113(1):15-24. doi: 10.1111/add.13951. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
The DSM-IV personality disorders (PDs) are comorbid with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and with each other. It remains unclear which PD criteria are most likely to drive onset and recurrence of AUD and which are merely confounded with those criteria. We determine which individual PD criteria predict AUD and the degree of underlying genetic and/or environmental aetiology.
A prospective observational twin study.
Norway 1999-2011.
A total of 2528 and 2275 Norwegian adult twins in waves 1 and 2 variable-selection analyses, and 2785 in biometric analyses.
DSM-IV PDs and their 80 criteria were assessed using a structured personal interview, and AUD using the World Health Organization's Composite International Diagnostic Interview.
In a variable-selection analysis, two PD criteria were associated with AUD even after taking all the other criteria into account: criterion 8 of antisocial PD (childhood conduct disorder) and criterion 4 of borderline PD (self-damaging impulsive behaviours). Adjusting for each other, their respective odds ratios were 3.4 [confidence interval (CI) = 2.1-5.4] and 5.0 (CI = 3.3-7.7). Endorsement strength of the criteria was associated with AUD in a dose-response manner and they explained 5.5% of variation in AUD risk-more than the full diagnoses of antisocial and borderline PDs together (0.5%). The association between borderline criterion 4 and AUD 10 years later derived mainly from their overlapping genetic factors, whereas the association between antisocial criterion 8 and AUD 10 years later was due to both genetic and non-genetic factors.
Conduct disorder and self-harming impulsivity are the foremost risk traits for alcohol use disorder among the 80 personality disorder criteria of DSM-IV, predicting alcohol use disorder more effectively than personality disorder diagnoses. The twin-study analysis suggested that conduct disorder represents a joint genetic and developmental risk for alcohol use disorder and that impulsivity is a genetic risk.
DSM-IV 人格障碍(PD)与酒精使用障碍(AUD)和彼此共病。目前尚不清楚哪些 PD 标准最有可能导致 AUD 的发作和复发,哪些标准只是与这些标准混淆。我们确定哪些个体 PD 标准预测 AUD 以及潜在遗传和/或环境病因的程度。
一项前瞻性观察性双胞胎研究。
挪威 1999-2011 年。
第 1 波和第 2 波变量选择分析中共有 2528 名和 2275 名挪威成年双胞胎,以及生物统计学分析中的 2785 名。
DSM-IV PD 及其 80 项标准使用结构化个人访谈进行评估,AUD 使用世界卫生组织综合国际诊断访谈进行评估。
在变量选择分析中,即使考虑了所有其他标准,两个 PD 标准也与 AUD 相关:反社会 PD 的标准 8(儿童期品行障碍)和边缘 PD 的标准 4(自我伤害冲动行为)。相互调整后,各自的优势比分别为 3.4(置信区间[CI] = 2.1-5.4)和 5.0(CI = 3.3-7.7)。标准的认可强度与 AUD 呈剂量反应关系,它们解释了 AUD 风险变异的 5.5%——超过反社会和边缘 PD 诊断的总和(0.5%)。10 年后,边缘标准 4 与 AUD 之间的关联主要来自于它们重叠的遗传因素,而反社会标准 8 与 AUD 10 年后的关联则来自遗传和非遗传因素。
在 DSM-IV 的 80 项人格障碍标准中,品行障碍和自我伤害冲动是酒精使用障碍的首要风险特征,比人格障碍诊断更有效地预测酒精使用障碍。双胞胎研究分析表明,品行障碍代表了酒精使用障碍的共同遗传和发育风险,而冲动是遗传风险。