Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Curr Biol. 2018 Nov 19;28(22):3667-3673.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.09.064. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
Observations of animals feeding in aggregations are often interpreted as events of social foraging, but it can be difficult to determine whether the animals arrived at the foraging sites after collective search [1-4] or whether they found the sites by following a leader [5, 6] or even independently, aggregating as an artifact of food availability [7, 8]. Distinguishing between these explanations is important, because functionally, they might have very different consequences. In the first case, the animals could benefit from the presence of conspecifics, whereas in the second and third, they often suffer from increased competition [3, 9-13]. Using novel miniature sensors, we recorded GPS tracks and audio of five species of bats, monitoring their movement and interactions with conspecifics, which could be inferred from the audio recordings. We examined the hypothesis that food distribution plays a key role in determining social foraging patterns [14-16]. Specifically, this hypothesis predicts that searching for an ephemeral resource (whose distribution in time or space is hard to predict) is more likely to favor social foraging [10, 13-15] than searching for a predictable resource. The movement and social interactions differed between bats foraging on ephemeral versus predictable resources. Ephemeral species changed foraging sites and showed large temporal variation nightly. They aggregated with conspecifics as was supported by playback experiments and computer simulations. In contrast, predictable species were never observed near conspecifics and showed high spatial fidelity to the same foraging sites over multiple nights. Our results suggest that resource (un)predictability influences the costs and benefits of social foraging.
对动物群体觅食的观察通常被解释为社会觅食的事件,但很难确定动物是在集体搜索后到达觅食地点的[1-4],还是通过跟随领导者[5,6],甚至是独立地发现这些地点的,因为食物的可用性使得它们聚集在一起[7,8]。区分这些解释很重要,因为从功能上讲,它们可能会产生非常不同的后果。在第一种情况下,动物可以从同类的存在中受益,而在第二种和第三种情况下,它们通常会因竞争加剧而受苦[3,9-13]。我们使用新颖的微型传感器记录了五种蝙蝠的 GPS 轨迹和音频,监测它们的运动和与同类的相互作用,这些可以从音频记录中推断出来。我们检验了食物分布在决定社会觅食模式中的关键作用这一假说[14-16]。具体来说,该假说预测,寻找短暂的资源(其在时间或空间上的分布难以预测)比寻找可预测的资源更有可能促进社会觅食[10,13-15]。对短暂资源和可预测资源进行觅食的蝙蝠的运动和社会互动有所不同。短暂物种会改变觅食地点,并在夜间表现出很大的时间变化。播放实验和计算机模拟支持它们与同类聚集在一起。相比之下,从未观察到可预测物种在同类附近,并且在多个夜晚对同一觅食地点表现出高度的空间保真度。我们的研究结果表明,资源的(不可)预测性会影响社会觅食的成本和收益。