Simforoosh Nasser, Dadpour Mehdi, Mofid Bahram
Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Shahid Labbafinejad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, 9th Boostan, Pasdaran avenue, Tehran, Iran.
Shahid Labbafinejad Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, 9th Boostan, Pasdaran avenue, Tehran, Iran.
Urol J. 2019 May 5;16(2):162-167. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4783.
to evaluate the feasibility of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (RP), lymphadenectomy, and bilateral orchiectomy in patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) with oligo- and poly-metastases. Furthermore, the functional and oncological outcomes of these patients in comparison with the control group that underwent treatment only with systemic therapy (ST group) is investigated in a well-selected, prospective cohort study. Material and methods: A total of 26 patients were enrolled in CRP (cytoreductive radical prostatectomy) group and 23 patients in ST group. The patients have been followed (9 to 43 months(median:19.5)) with PSA (prostate specific antigen), whole body bone scan and other necessary imaging and laboratory tests. Functional and oncological outcomes were compared between two groups.
Biochemical relapse was occurred in 9 patients (34.6%) in CRP group and in 17 patients (73.9%) in ST group (p=0.01). Whole-body bone scans showed reduced metastasis volume occurred more in CRP group (p=0.003). There was no voiding dysfunction in 22 patients in CRP group post-operatively (84.6%), while in ST group trans-urethral resection of prostate or permanent Foley catheter was needed in 8 patients (34.7%) and bilateral percutaneous nephrostomy was done in one. six patients in CRP group (23%) and eight patients in ST group (34.7%) were expired because of prostate cancer and there was no difference between cancer specific survival between two groups (p=0.975).
Although surgery doesn't improve cancer specific survival in patients with skeletal metastatic prostate cancer in the short term, but offers better local control, improves biochemical relapse-free survival, might prevent excessive interventions, reduce bone pain and metastasis.
评估在伴有寡转移和多转移的晚期前列腺癌(PCa)患者中进行细胞减灭性根治性前列腺切除术(RP)、淋巴结清扫术和双侧睾丸切除术的可行性。此外,在一项精心挑选的前瞻性队列研究中,对这些患者与仅接受全身治疗的对照组(ST组)的功能和肿瘤学结局进行了研究。材料与方法:CRP(细胞减灭性根治性前列腺切除术)组共纳入26例患者,ST组纳入23例患者。通过前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、全身骨扫描及其他必要的影像学和实验室检查对患者进行了随访(9至43个月,中位数:19.5个月)。比较了两组的功能和肿瘤学结局。
CRP组9例患者(34.6%)发生生化复发,ST组17例患者(73.9%)发生生化复发(p = 0.01)。全身骨扫描显示CRP组转移灶体积缩小更为明显(p = 0.003)。CRP组22例患者术后无排尿功能障碍(84.6%),而ST组8例患者(34.7%)需要行经尿道前列腺切除术或留置永久性 Foley 导尿管,1例患者进行了双侧经皮肾造瘘术。CRP组6例患者(23%)和ST组8例患者(34.7%)因前列腺癌死亡,两组的癌症特异性生存率无差异(p = 0.975)。
虽然手术在短期内不能提高骨转移前列腺癌患者的癌症特异性生存率,但能提供更好的局部控制,提高无生化复发生存率,可能避免过度干预,减轻骨痛并减少转移。