Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Department of Urology, Advanced Urotechnology Center, Scientific Institute "Istituto Auxologico Italiano," Milan, Italy.
Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):289-292. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.040. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
In the absence of data from randomized trials, the role of local treatment in metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is gaining interest. Our study aimed to assess perioperative and long-term oncologic outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) in a selected cohort of 11 patients with oligometastatic disease treated with RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection between 2006 and 2011. Oligometastatic disease was defined as the presence of five or fewer bone lesions at bone scan with or without suspicious pelvic or retroperitoneal nodal involvement at preoperative imaging. The minimum follow-up for survivors was 5 yr. Perioperative outcomes, clinical progression, and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) were evaluated. Median age was 72 yr. Median operative time, blood loss, and length of hospitalization were 170min, 750ml, and 13 d, respectively. Overall, two patients (18%) experienced grade 3 complications in the postoperative period, and eight (73%) received blood transfusions. Overall, 10 (91%) and 8 (73%) patients had lymph node invasion and positive surgical margins, respectively. Adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy was administered to 10 patients (91%). Median follow-up for survivors was 63 mo. The 7-yr clinical progression- and CSM-free survival rates were 45% and 82%, respectively. Our findings support the safety and effectiveness of RP in a highly selected cohort of PCa patients with bone metastases and long-term follow-up.
We evaluated the outcomes of patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy with a minimum of 5-yr follow-up. This surgical procedure performed with a multimodal approach might represent a safe and feasible option in selected men and provide acceptable oncologic outcomes at long-term follow-up.
在缺乏随机试验数据的情况下,局部治疗在转移性前列腺癌(PCa)中的作用引起了人们的兴趣。我们的研究旨在评估 2006 年至 2011 年间接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)和扩展盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗的 11 例寡转移疾病患者的围手术期和长期肿瘤学结果,这些患者被定义为骨扫描中存在 5 个或 5 个以下骨病变,且术前影像学检查显示可疑盆腔或腹膜后淋巴结受累。幸存者的随访时间至少为 5 年。评估了围手术期结果、临床进展和癌症特异性死亡率(CSM)。中位年龄为 72 岁。中位手术时间、失血量和住院时间分别为 170 分钟、750ml 和 13 天。总体而言,有 2 名患者(18%)在术后期间发生 3 级并发症,8 名患者(73%)接受了输血。总体而言,有 10 名患者(91%)和 8 名患者(73%)分别有淋巴结侵犯和阳性手术切缘。10 名患者(91%)接受了辅助雄激素剥夺治疗。幸存者的中位随访时间为 63 个月。7 年时的临床无进展和 CSM 生存率分别为 45%和 82%。我们的研究结果支持在有长期随访的情况下,对有骨转移的高度选择的前列腺癌患者进行 RP 的安全性和有效性。
我们评估了接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的寡转移性前列腺癌患者的结果,这些患者的随访时间至少为 5 年。这种采用多模态方法的手术程序可能是一种安全可行的选择,适用于某些男性,并在长期随访中提供可接受的肿瘤学结果。