The Helsinki Lab of Ornithology, Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Biology, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden.
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jan;25(1):304-313. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14461. Epub 2018 Nov 4.
Climate change is driving species to shift their distributions toward high altitudes and latitudes, while habitat loss and fragmentation may hamper species ability to follow their climatic envelope. These two drivers of change may act in synergy, with particularly disastrous impacts on biodiversity. Protected areas, PAs, may thus represent crucial buffers against the compounded effects of climate change and habitat loss. However, large-scale studies assessing the performance of PAs as such buffers remain scarce and are largely based on species occurrence data. Conversely, abundance data have proven to be more reliable for addressing changes in wildlife populations under climate change. We evaluated changes in bird abundance from the 1970s-80s to the 2000s inside and outside PAs at the trailing range edge of 30 northern bird species and at the leading range edge of 70 southern species. Abundances of retracting northern species were higher and declined less inside PAs at their trailing range edge. The positive effect of PAs on bird abundances was particularly marked in northern species that rely strongly on PAs, that is, their density distribution is largely confined within PAs. These species were nearly absent outside PAs in the 2000s. The abundances of southern species were in general lower inside PAs and increased less from the 70s-80s to 2000s. Nonetheless, species with high reliance on PAs had much higher abundances inside than outside PAs in the 2000s. These results show that PAs are essential in mitigating the retraction of northern species, but also facilitate northward expansions of southern species highly reliant on PAs. Our study provides empirical evidence documenting the role of PAs in facilitating species to adjust to rapidly changing climatic conditions, thereby contributing to the mitigation of impending biodiversity loss. PAs may thus allow time for initiating wider conservation programs on currently unprotected land.
气候变化促使物种向高海拔和高纬度地区迁徙,而栖息地的丧失和破碎化可能会阻碍物种跟随其气候范围的能力。这两个变化驱动因素可能会协同作用,对生物多样性造成特别灾难性的影响。保护区 (PA) 因此可能是应对气候变化和栖息地丧失的复合影响的关键缓冲区。然而,评估保护区作为此类缓冲区的表现的大规模研究仍然很少,并且主要基于物种存在数据。相反,丰富度数据已被证明对于在气候变化下解决野生动物种群变化更为可靠。我们评估了 30 种北方鸟类的后缘和 70 种南方鸟类的前缘保护区内和保护区外从 20 世纪 70 年代到 80 年代到 2000 年代鸟类丰富度的变化。在其后缘,退缩北方物种的丰富度更高,在保护区内下降幅度更小。保护区对鸟类丰富度的积极影响在强烈依赖保护区的北方物种中尤为明显,即它们的密度分布主要局限于保护区内。这些物种在 2000 年代几乎不存在于保护区外。南方物种的丰富度通常在保护区内较低,并且从 70 年代到 80 年代到 2000 年代增加较少。尽管如此,高度依赖保护区的物种在 2000 年代的保护区内的丰富度远高于保护区外。这些结果表明,保护区对于缓解北方物种的退缩至关重要,但也促进了高度依赖保护区的南方物种的向北扩张。我们的研究提供了实证证据,证明了保护区在促进物种适应快速变化的气候条件方面的作用,从而有助于缓解即将发生的生物多样性丧失。保护区因此可能为当前未受保护的土地上启动更广泛的保护计划提供时间。