• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结果延迟对次优选择的影响。

The influence of outcome delay on suboptimal choice.

作者信息

McDevitt Margaret A, Pisklak Jeffrey M, Spetch Marcia, Dunn Roger

机构信息

Department of Psychology, McDaniel College, 2 College Hill, Westminster, MD, 21157, United States.

University of Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:279-285. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2018.10.008
PMID:30394293
Abstract

Under certain conditions pigeons will choose an option that provides less probable food over one that provides more probable food. This suboptimal choice behavior occurs when the outcomes are delayed and stimuli during the delay differentially signal the upcoming outcomes on the suboptimal alternative, but not the optimal alternative. The present study assessed whether duration of the outcome delay affects pigeons' suboptimal preference. Pigeons chose between a suboptimal alternative that provided food 20% of the time and an optimal alternative that provided food 80% of the time. Stimuli presented during the delays signaled the outcomes on the suboptimal alternative, but not on the optimal alternative. The outcome delays were 5 s in some conditions and 20 s in others. The results of two experiments demonstrate that behavior is generally more suboptimal when the outcome delays are longer but tends to stay relatively suboptimal if subjects experience the long delay condition before the short delay condition. The finding that behavior is more suboptimal with longer delays to the outcomes is consistent with the view that pigeons' suboptimal choice is influenced by both conditioned and primary reinforcement and is inconsistent with the view that suboptimal choice is influenced solely by signal value.

摘要

在某些条件下,鸽子会选择获得食物可能性较小的选项,而不是选择获得食物可能性较大的选项。当结果延迟出现,且延迟期间的刺激能以不同方式预示次优选项(而非最优选项)即将出现的结果时,就会出现这种次优选择行为。本研究评估了结果延迟的时长是否会影响鸽子的次优偏好。鸽子需要在一个次优选项(20%的时间能获得食物)和一个最优选项(80%的时间能获得食物)之间做出选择。延迟期间呈现的刺激预示了次优选项的结果,但没有预示最优选项的结果。在某些条件下,结果延迟为5秒,在其他条件下为20秒。两项实验的结果表明,当结果延迟较长时,行为通常更偏向次优,但如果受试者先经历长延迟条件,再经历短延迟条件,行为往往会保持相对次优。结果延迟较长时行为更偏向次优这一发现,与鸽子的次优选择受条件强化和初级强化共同影响的观点一致,而与次优选择仅受信号值影响的观点不一致。

相似文献

1
The influence of outcome delay on suboptimal choice.结果延迟对次优选择的影响。
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:279-285. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
2
Human and pigeon suboptimal choice.人类和鸽子的次优选择。
Learn Behav. 2019 Dec;47(4):334-343. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00391-8.
3
When good pigeons make bad decisions: Choice with probabilistic delays and outcomes.当优秀的鸽子做出错误决策时:具有概率性延迟和结果的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Nov;104(3):241-51. doi: 10.1002/jeab.177.
4
Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Does the predictive value of the conditioned reinforcer alone determine choice?鸽子的次优选择:仅条件强化物的预测价值就能决定选择吗?
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:320-326. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.07.018. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
5
Rats engage in suboptimal choice when the delay to food is sufficiently long.当获取食物的延迟足够长时,大鼠会做出次优选择。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Jul;45(3):301-310. doi: 10.1037/xan0000211. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Suboptimal Choice in Pigeons: Stimulus Value Predicts Choice over Frequencies.鸽子的次优选择:刺激值预测对频率的选择。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159336. eCollection 2016.
7
Contrast between what is expected and what occurs increases pigeon's suboptimal choice.预期与实际发生情况之间的差异增加了鸽子的次优选择。
Anim Cogn. 2019 Jan;22(1):81-87. doi: 10.1007/s10071-018-1223-x. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
8
When good news leads to bad choices.当好消息导致错误选择时。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 Jan;105(1):23-40. doi: 10.1002/jeab.192.
9
Suboptimal choice in a percentage-reinforcement procedure: effects of signal condition and terminal-link length.百分比强化程序中的次优选择:信号条件和终段长度的影响
J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Mar;53(2):219-34. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1990.53-219.
10
Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.鸽子的次优选择:选择主要基于条件性强化物的价值,而非整体强化率。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2016 Apr;42(2):212-20. doi: 10.1037/xan0000092. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Do goldfish like to be informed?金鱼喜欢被告知吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 May;292(2047):20242842. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2842. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
Representations of the intrinsic value of information in mouse orbitofrontal cortex.小鼠眶额皮质中信息内在价值的表征。
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 16:2023.10.13.562291. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.13.562291.
3
Human Behavior in Suboptimal Choice Tasks: Defining Optimality.次优选择任务中的人类行为:界定最优性。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 Jul 1;47(2):435-447. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00411-7. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Temporal context effects on suboptimal choice.时间背景对次优选择的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2737-2745. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02519-y. Epub 2024 May 17.
5
Paradoxical choice and the reinforcing value of information.矛盾选择与信息的强化价值。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Mar;26(2):623-637. doi: 10.1007/s10071-022-01698-2. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
6
Human and pigeon suboptimal choice.人类和鸽子的次优选择。
Learn Behav. 2019 Dec;47(4):334-343. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00391-8.