Cunningham Paul J, Shahan Timothy A
Department of Psychology.
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Jul;45(3):301-310. doi: 10.1037/xan0000211. Epub 2019 May 9.
Numerous examples in the decision-making literature demonstrate that animals sometimes make choices that are not in their long-term best interest. One particular example finds pigeons preferring a low-probability alternative in lieu of a high-probability alternative, referred to as suboptimal choice. Although there is ample evidence that pigeons engage in such suboptimal choice, there is currently weak evidence (at best) that rats also do so. Cunningham and Shahan's (2018) temporal information-theoretic model suggests that suboptimal choice in pigeons arises when (1) the low-probability alternative provides stimuli that convey more temporal information than stimuli associated with the high-probability alternative and (2) when the delay to food is much longer relative to the delay to temporally informative signals at the choice point. The latter condition plays the important role of biasing decision making to be governed by the relative temporal information conveyed by stimuli rather than the relative rate of food delivery. The present experiment explored the possibility that rats will engage in suboptimal choice if the delay to food at the choice point is sufficiently long, as the temporal information-theoretic model suggests. Rats were given a choice between a suboptimal alternative providing food 20% of the time and an optimal alternative providing food 50% of the time. The suboptimal alternative provided stimuli that differentially signaled choice outcomes whereas the optimal alternative did not. The postchoice delay was manipulated across conditions and ranged from 10 s to 50 s. As with previous research, rats did not engage in suboptimal choice when the postchoice delay was 10 s. However, once the delay was at least 30 s, rats engaged in suboptimal choice. These results are consistent with the temporal information-theoretic model of suboptimal choice and suggest that rats and pigeons likely do not differ in the decision-making processes involved in the suboptimal choice procedure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
决策文献中的大量例子表明,动物有时会做出不符合其长期最佳利益的选择。一个特别的例子是,鸽子更喜欢低概率的选择而不是高概率的选择,这被称为次优选择。尽管有充分的证据表明鸽子会做出这种次优选择,但目前(充其量)只有微弱的证据表明大鼠也会这样做。坎宁安和沙汉(2018年)的时间信息理论模型表明,鸽子的次优选择出现于以下情况:(1)低概率选择提供的刺激比与高概率选择相关的刺激传达更多的时间信息;(2)相对于在选择点处与时间信息信号相关的延迟,食物延迟要长得多。后一种情况起到了重要作用,即使决策偏向于由刺激传达的相对时间信息而非食物递送的相对速率来支配。本实验探讨了如果选择点处的食物延迟足够长,大鼠是否会像时间信息理论模型所表明的那样做出次优选择的可能性。大鼠被给予在一个次优选择(20%的时间提供食物)和一个最优选择(50%的时间提供食物)之间进行选择。次优选择提供了能区分信号选择结果的刺激,而最优选择则没有。选择后的延迟在不同条件下进行了操纵,范围从10秒到50秒。与之前的研究一样,当选择后的延迟为10秒时,大鼠没有做出次优选择。然而,一旦延迟至少为30秒,大鼠就会做出次优选择。这些结果与次优选择的时间信息理论模型一致,并表明大鼠和鸽子在次优选择过程中涉及的决策过程可能没有差异。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2019美国心理学会,保留所有权利)