• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当获取食物的延迟足够长时,大鼠会做出次优选择。

Rats engage in suboptimal choice when the delay to food is sufficiently long.

作者信息

Cunningham Paul J, Shahan Timothy A

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Jul;45(3):301-310. doi: 10.1037/xan0000211. Epub 2019 May 9.

DOI:10.1037/xan0000211
PMID:31070433
Abstract

Numerous examples in the decision-making literature demonstrate that animals sometimes make choices that are not in their long-term best interest. One particular example finds pigeons preferring a low-probability alternative in lieu of a high-probability alternative, referred to as suboptimal choice. Although there is ample evidence that pigeons engage in such suboptimal choice, there is currently weak evidence (at best) that rats also do so. Cunningham and Shahan's (2018) temporal information-theoretic model suggests that suboptimal choice in pigeons arises when (1) the low-probability alternative provides stimuli that convey more temporal information than stimuli associated with the high-probability alternative and (2) when the delay to food is much longer relative to the delay to temporally informative signals at the choice point. The latter condition plays the important role of biasing decision making to be governed by the relative temporal information conveyed by stimuli rather than the relative rate of food delivery. The present experiment explored the possibility that rats will engage in suboptimal choice if the delay to food at the choice point is sufficiently long, as the temporal information-theoretic model suggests. Rats were given a choice between a suboptimal alternative providing food 20% of the time and an optimal alternative providing food 50% of the time. The suboptimal alternative provided stimuli that differentially signaled choice outcomes whereas the optimal alternative did not. The postchoice delay was manipulated across conditions and ranged from 10 s to 50 s. As with previous research, rats did not engage in suboptimal choice when the postchoice delay was 10 s. However, once the delay was at least 30 s, rats engaged in suboptimal choice. These results are consistent with the temporal information-theoretic model of suboptimal choice and suggest that rats and pigeons likely do not differ in the decision-making processes involved in the suboptimal choice procedure. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

决策文献中的大量例子表明,动物有时会做出不符合其长期最佳利益的选择。一个特别的例子是,鸽子更喜欢低概率的选择而不是高概率的选择,这被称为次优选择。尽管有充分的证据表明鸽子会做出这种次优选择,但目前(充其量)只有微弱的证据表明大鼠也会这样做。坎宁安和沙汉(2018年)的时间信息理论模型表明,鸽子的次优选择出现于以下情况:(1)低概率选择提供的刺激比与高概率选择相关的刺激传达更多的时间信息;(2)相对于在选择点处与时间信息信号相关的延迟,食物延迟要长得多。后一种情况起到了重要作用,即使决策偏向于由刺激传达的相对时间信息而非食物递送的相对速率来支配。本实验探讨了如果选择点处的食物延迟足够长,大鼠是否会像时间信息理论模型所表明的那样做出次优选择的可能性。大鼠被给予在一个次优选择(20%的时间提供食物)和一个最优选择(50%的时间提供食物)之间进行选择。次优选择提供了能区分信号选择结果的刺激,而最优选择则没有。选择后的延迟在不同条件下进行了操纵,范围从10秒到50秒。与之前的研究一样,当选择后的延迟为10秒时,大鼠没有做出次优选择。然而,一旦延迟至少为30秒,大鼠就会做出次优选择。这些结果与次优选择的时间信息理论模型一致,并表明大鼠和鸽子在次优选择过程中涉及的决策过程可能没有差异。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》(c)2019美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
Rats engage in suboptimal choice when the delay to food is sufficiently long.当获取食物的延迟足够长时,大鼠会做出次优选择。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2019 Jul;45(3):301-310. doi: 10.1037/xan0000211. Epub 2019 May 9.
2
Delays to food-predictive stimuli do not affect suboptimal choice in rats.对食物预测性刺激的延迟不会影响大鼠的次优选择。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2020 Oct;46(4):385-397. doi: 10.1037/xan0000245. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
The influence of outcome delay on suboptimal choice.结果延迟对次优选择的影响。
Behav Processes. 2018 Dec;157:279-285. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Oct 28.
4
Suboptimal choice, reward-predictive signals, and temporal information.次优选择、奖励预测信号和时间信息。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2018 Jan;44(1):1-22. doi: 10.1037/xan0000160.
5
When good pigeons make bad decisions: Choice with probabilistic delays and outcomes.当优秀的鸽子做出错误决策时:具有概率性延迟和结果的选择。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2015 Nov;104(3):241-51. doi: 10.1002/jeab.177.
6
Rats maintain optimal choice when facing long terminal links in a "suboptimal choice" procedure.当大鼠面临“次优选择”程序中的长终端链接时,它们会保持最优选择。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2021 Apr;47(2):200-210. doi: 10.1037/xan0000286.
7
Human and pigeon suboptimal choice.人类和鸽子的次优选择。
Learn Behav. 2019 Dec;47(4):334-343. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00391-8.
8
Suboptimal choice by pigeons is eliminated when key-pecking behavior is replaced by treadle-pressing.当啄键行为被踩踏板行为取代时,鸽子的次优选择就会被消除。
Behav Processes. 2020 Sep;178:104157. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104157. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
9
When good news leads to bad choices.当好消息导致错误选择时。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 Jan;105(1):23-40. doi: 10.1002/jeab.192.
10
The role of inhibition in the suboptimal choice task.抑制在次优选择任务中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2021 Oct;47(4):429-444. doi: 10.1037/xan0000300.

引用本文的文献

1
Do goldfish like to be informed?金鱼喜欢被告知吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 May;292(2047):20242842. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2842. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
A Common Stay-on-Goal Mechanism in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex for Information and Effort Choices.前扣带回皮质中用于信息和努力选择的一种常见的持续目标机制。
eNeuro. 2025 Mar 7;12(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0454-24.2025. Print 2025 Mar.
3
Rats' performance in a suboptimal choice procedure implemented in a natural-foraging analogue.在自然觅食模拟中实施的次优选择程序中大鼠的表现。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Nov 1;27(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01913-2.
4
Representations of the intrinsic value of information in mouse orbitofrontal cortex.小鼠眶额皮质中信息内在价值的表征。
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 16:2023.10.13.562291. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.13.562291.
5
To know or not to know? Curiosity and the value of prospective information in animals.知道还是不知道?好奇心与动物前瞻性信息的价值。
Learn Behav. 2025 Mar;53(1):114-127. doi: 10.3758/s13420-024-00647-y. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
6
Human Behavior in Suboptimal Choice Tasks: Defining Optimality.次优选择任务中的人类行为:界定最优性。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 Jul 1;47(2):435-447. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00411-7. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Hungry pigeons prefer sooner rare food over later likely food or faster information.饥饿的鸽子更喜欢早一点的稀罕食物,而非晚一点的可能得到的食物或更快的信息。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 24;15:1426434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1426434. eCollection 2024.
8
A special role for anterior cingulate cortex, but not orbitofrontal cortex or basolateral amygdala, in choices involving information.扣带前回在涉及信息的选择中具有特殊作用,但眶额皮质和杏仁核基底外侧核没有这种作用。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Apr 1;34(4). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae135.
9
On the value of advanced information about delayed rewards.关于延迟奖励的高级信息的价值。
Anim Cogn. 2024 Mar 2;27(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s10071-024-01856-8.
10
Pavlovian learning and conditioned reinforcement.巴甫洛夫式学习和条件强化。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Jun;56(3):498-519. doi: 10.1002/jaba.1004. Epub 2023 May 31.